Posted by: Marski
« on: May 17, 2014, 02:51:38 PM »Blessed Steve has done a wonderful work.
Posted by: Britich
« on: April 04, 2014, 04:49:26 AM »Quote from: TheDeadlyShoe link=topic=6537. msg69989#msg69989 date=1392880991
Would it be possible to get an on/off checkbox for NPR terraforming? I like to play no-terraforming.
I agree, I love to play no terraforming so a checkbox would be awesome.
Posted by: boggo2300
« on: March 04, 2014, 02:35:22 PM »No, you're MUCH better at running a forum than he is 
Matt
Matt
Posted by: Erik L
« on: March 03, 2014, 04:17:48 PM »
Someones been spending too much time on the LotRo forums!
Matt
I am not Sapience. Nor am I a reasonable facsimile. :p And I think I asked you the same thing the first time you popped off a SoonTM here.
Posted by: boggo2300
« on: March 03, 2014, 04:10:44 PM »SoonTM
Someones been spending too much time on the LotRo forums!
Matt
Posted by: Bremen
« on: March 03, 2014, 12:52:41 AM »Someday I'll be able to have a primarily carrier and beam fighter based force without it getting laughed at (and blown up by missiles). This is one step further down that road
Posted by: TheDeadlyShoe
« on: March 02, 2014, 07:59:27 PM »Long ago the Elder Scrolls predicted the release of 6.4. No man can say when, for those who peer deeply into the mysteries of the ages are driven mad.
Posted by: Erik L
« on: March 02, 2014, 07:36:23 PM »Have to admit, looking forward to 6.4.
I know Steve won't say, but do any of you others that have been around here have a guess as when we might see it?
SoonTM
Posted by: PaxMondo
« on: March 02, 2014, 05:25:26 PM »Excellent news about smaller beam FC's. No more gigantic beam FC's at low tech levels, hooray!
Have to admit, looking forward to 6.4.
I know Steve won't say, but do any of you others that have been around here have a guess as when we might see it?
Posted by: Garfunkel
« on: March 02, 2014, 02:46:22 PM »Excellent news about smaller beam FC's. No more gigantic beam FC's at low tech levels, hooray!
Posted by: MarcAFK
« on: February 22, 2014, 10:00:04 AM »While you're suggesting that, perhaps every event related to the combat which destroyed that ship could be logged, or perhaps under the intelligence window for each ship class all combat events related to the class could be logged, with the game preferring to keep track only of the last fatal combat involving that ship class. But this is a suggestion and actually is in the wrong thread.
Back on topic kinda, I've noticed steve that in your current AAR battles seem to be very AMM dominated, is there a reason for this? I was wondering if there are circumstances where NPR's would prefer to build AMMs over ASMs, and if this is working as intended, I have no problem with the way these battles were going since the results speak for themself, I would assume that equally matched forces facing each other but with one equipped with AMMS only and one with ASMs only would probably leave the advantage to the guys with the AMMs, so any development that causes greater use of AMMs by the enemy can only make the game harder and the enemy smarter.
In fact I think my next topic for the tactical command forum will be related to exactly this.
Back on topic kinda, I've noticed steve that in your current AAR battles seem to be very AMM dominated, is there a reason for this? I was wondering if there are circumstances where NPR's would prefer to build AMMs over ASMs, and if this is working as intended, I have no problem with the way these battles were going since the results speak for themself, I would assume that equally matched forces facing each other but with one equipped with AMMS only and one with ASMs only would probably leave the advantage to the guys with the AMMs, so any development that causes greater use of AMMs by the enemy can only make the game harder and the enemy smarter.
In fact I think my next topic for the tactical command forum will be related to exactly this.
Posted by: Kaiser
« on: February 22, 2014, 08:56:29 AM »Is it possible to have a record of ships destroyed? Something like with name of the ship, class, info about the weapon which destroyed it, date of destruction and position.
This record should be both for human player and AI (for AI only for known ships destroyed).
Maybe it would be not so useful tool, but it would be nice read some statistic info, during boring part of the game
This record should be both for human player and AI (for AI only for known ships destroyed).
Maybe it would be not so useful tool, but it would be nice read some statistic info, during boring part of the game
Posted by: TheDeadlyShoe
« on: February 20, 2014, 01:23:11 AM »Would it be possible to get an on/off checkbox for NPR terraforming? I like to play no-terraforming.
Posted by: ardem
« on: February 12, 2014, 12:47:38 AM »NPR Ground Invasions Hell yes!, I would wet my pants. It would give those Garrison formation something to fear, other then children with rocks.
Posted by: deoved
« on: February 10, 2014, 04:48:36 AM »If Steve can get NPRs to launch ground invasions, I will be in heaven!
The most desirable addition!
