Author Topic: Scientists Should Work Together  (Read 3280 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 381654729 (OP)

  • Chief Petty Officer
  • ***
  • ?
  • Posts: 40
Scientists Should Work Together
« on: April 26, 2014, 03:21:41 AM »
I started the game with 5 Propulsion scientists and no other scientists. "Great", I thought, all my ships are going to be very fast, have no armor, and armed with short ranged, inaccurate, low-damage missiles.

Except without the "very fast" part. Since my scientists all have low admin ratings, I was not able to expedite any specific project, so I ended up with slow, poorly armored, and generally ineffective warships. Of course my ship designs may have contributed to the ineffective part.

I think the ability to assign multiple scientists to the same project will alleviate this frustration. The scientists' research bonus shouldn't stack fully lest someone puts every scientist on the same project and research one tech a day. Maybe you can only "stack" scientists in their field of specialty. Maybe the highest admin rating of your best scientist determines how many scientists you can stack. In any case, I don't understand why only one scientist may work on a project at a time. Are they that jealous of each other?
 

Offline Rich.h

  • Captain
  • **********
  • R
  • Posts: 555
  • Thanked: 55 times
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2014, 04:20:34 AM »
I am guessing they only represent lead scientists for the lab. The same way when NASA tells us about a new mission launch the press conference only has the team head talking and not each and every intern who worked on it. If we started having every single scientist there to place in projects I cannot imagine how tedious the micromanaging of research would get.
 

Offline 381654729 (OP)

  • Chief Petty Officer
  • ***
  • ?
  • Posts: 40
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2014, 04:29:58 PM »
I cannot imagine many research processes that cannot be split up into smaller processes, with a different lead scientist for each part. This can be abstracted by assigning more than one scientist to the overall project.
 

Offline Steve Walmsley

  • Aurora Designer
  • Star Marshal
  • S
  • Posts: 11675
  • Thanked: 20470 times
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2014, 05:19:14 PM »
I started the game with 5 Propulsion scientists and no other scientists. "Great", I thought, all my ships are going to be very fast, have no armor, and armed with short ranged, inaccurate, low-damage missiles.

Except without the "very fast" part. Since my scientists all have low admin ratings, I was not able to expedite any specific project, so I ended up with slow, poorly armored, and generally ineffective warships. Of course my ship designs may have contributed to the ineffective part.

I think the ability to assign multiple scientists to the same project will alleviate this frustration. The scientists' research bonus shouldn't stack fully lest someone puts every scientist on the same project and research one tech a day. Maybe you can only "stack" scientists in their field of specialty. Maybe the highest admin rating of your best scientist determines how many scientists you can stack. In any case, I don't understand why only one scientist may work on a project at a time. Are they that jealous of each other?

The 'scientist' is the head of a very large research team supported by thousands of people. The admin rating represents just how large an organization he or she can effectively control. I have considered replacing scientists with companies in a similar way to Hearts of Iron, which would be more realistic, but from an RP perspective it's easier to identify with a specific person.
 

Offline alex_brunius

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1240
  • Thanked: 153 times
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2014, 05:00:03 AM »
The 'scientist' is the head of a very large research team supported by thousands of people. The admin rating represents just how large an organization he or she can effectively control. I have considered replacing scientists with companies in a similar way to Hearts of Iron, which would be more realistic, but from an RP perspective it's easier to identify with a specific person.

This would be a pretty natural way to evolve the game considering you already implemented company names for components.

It would also solve my main problem with scientists, how you overnight can lose pretty much you entire nations specialization and experience ( which can be up to +65*4 =+260% ) in a single research field when you lose a scientists by accident. That is far from realistic and immersion breaking for me.
 

Offline Steve Walmsley

  • Aurora Designer
  • Star Marshal
  • S
  • Posts: 11675
  • Thanked: 20470 times
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2014, 08:33:48 AM »
This would be a pretty natural way to evolve the game considering you already implemented company names for components.

It would also solve my main problem with scientists, how you overnight can lose pretty much you entire nations specialization and experience ( which can be up to +65*4 =+260% ) in a single research field when you lose a scientists by accident. That is far from realistic and immersion breaking for me.

I guess if it was companies instead of specific people, you could have an event where they lose a key scientist and the company research bonus falls by some amount. Or you could have companies with bonuses in more than one field. Of course, taking this further you would have labs permanently dedicated to specific companies and perhaps they would increase their labs in the same way that mining companies increase the number of civilian mines. There could still be state-controlled labs, perhaps with smaller bonuses but in more fields, but you would rely a lot on the civilian sector. The state would contract specific research projects to each company.

Just thinking out loud :)
 

Offline Jorgen_CAB

  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • ***********
  • J
  • Posts: 2837
  • Thanked: 673 times
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2014, 09:16:54 AM »
Lot's of nice ideas there Steve... now back to coding that... ;)

We already had a thread about this recently, perhaps check that one out. But having the civilian sector provide most of the background research would be great. Things such as ship components should mostly be state controlled in some way. I wouldn't mind if there were some part of science you as a player have no direct control over but perhaps you could subsidize different fields you think are more important to you.
 

Offline Theodidactus

  • Registered
  • Commodore
  • **********
  • Posts: 628
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2014, 10:38:03 AM »
I like individual scientists, so please don't get rid of them.
My Theodidactus, now I see that you are excessively simple of mind and more gullible than most. The Crystal Sphere you seek cannot be found in nature, look about you...wander the whole cosmos, and you will find nothing but the clear sweet breezes of the great ethereal ocean enclosed not by any bound
 

Offline Owen Quillion

  • Chief Petty Officer
  • ***
  • O
  • Posts: 41
  • Thanked: 3 times
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2014, 11:09:20 AM »
I agree with Theo - individual scientists are one of the few ways to have an actual character involved with the at-least-not-necessarily military side of the game. I appreciate that the game essentially generates these narrative prompts at present.

I do think it would be neat to have a civilian aspect to research where you don't have total control, but I also want to have the opportunity for bleeding-edge mavericks working directly for the government.
 

Offline Jorgen_CAB

  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • ***********
  • J
  • Posts: 2837
  • Thanked: 673 times
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2014, 11:23:09 AM »
I think there can be room for both. Civilian research are done by corporations or institutions while government science are done by science teams lead by a personality.
 

Offline NihilRex

  • Lieutenant
  • *******
  • N
  • Posts: 188
  • Thanked: 2 times
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #10 on: April 27, 2014, 05:42:08 PM »
Suggestion - Direct vs contract research

Direct research uses government labs and has a single team lead.  RP\year is higher, but more expensive.

Contract research is handled like contract transport.  You put up a request for Fuel-Efficiency 0.9x, and it costs X wealth per RP performed by the civilians.  You have no idea when it will be finished, and at any time you can cancel the contract and assign the project to one of your own teams, keeping the RP you have paid for on that topic.

Id suggest 1 Wealth\RP for civilans and somewhere between 2 and 5 for government RP.
 

wilddog5

  • Guest
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2014, 12:48:08 AM »
i think that civilian research should be hidden from the player /empire NPR (what evil mega corporation tell the government of their revolutionary technologies) maybe acting like an allied race on the sameplanet.

you would get a message like "civilian company "X" has developed Fuel-Efficiency 0.9x" or "civilian ion drive 300" having a {CIV} note on the techs to remind you
using these of course costs more than if you did the research yourself both in designing/building components with civ tech so continuing/starting the research yourself would still have some benefit resulting
in a using now at greater cost vs DIY for less
 

Offline Zed 6

  • Sub-Lieutenant
  • ******
  • Z
  • Posts: 128
  • Thanked: 4 times
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #12 on: April 28, 2014, 07:47:11 AM »
I would be against this. I prefer to control my research. If this was implemented, I think it should be severely limited or a very reduced research rate, as I wouldn't want hundreds of civilian labs operating ( just like civilian ships), cluttering up everything.
 

Offline xeryon

  • Captain
  • **********
  • Posts: 581
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #13 on: April 28, 2014, 09:17:14 AM »
Limits are always a good thing but I think the more actions that civilians can perform on their own the more realistic the entire game becomes.  Why can't a civilian corporation found a research lab on an available body with enough population?  That lab would then produce small amounts of research.  Maybe just have it be generic research and you would be able to buy the research (akin to buying the output of CMC's) to have it add to your research rate as opposed to specific technologies.  Or take it a step more granular and have the facility be specialized to a particular field.  Like CMC's you could assign your own scientist to the facility.  Your scientist would improve output a little and receive experience.  This would give a training ground for scientists to improve skills so that when your lead P&P scientist with 65% boost dies you are not back to the guy with 5% as a shock to your research program.
 

Offline MarcAFK

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2005
  • Thanked: 134 times
  • ...it's so simple an idiot could have devised it..
Re: Scientists Should Work Together
« Reply #14 on: April 28, 2014, 10:19:22 AM »
I like the idea of civilian research facilities as it provides another aspect that could introduce roleplay, as well as make the game somewhat more dynamic.
Perhaps unlike CMCs which are worth 10 mines each, a CIV lab could be worth 1/10 of a research center and have an option to purchase the research output from it, albeit at a higher cost than your regular labs, if purchased the lab would select a project your scientists are already working on and add their output to it. Otherwise the lab wouldn't require any funding and would be left to randomly design components similar to what is produced when you start with pre researched ship systems, but weighted slightly towards making something that might be useful to you, maybe it could compare what's being made to what you already have, and unless it's either very different to what you're already using, range/power wise etc, or if it's similar to what you're using, but with newer technology, then the script rerolls for a new component.
The Lab could be named after one of the companies you've designed a component with already, and maybe it could specialise, for instance if you have earlier made a "weyland-yutani search sensor" the game could later roll a weyland-yutani Sensors research lab, which might design a bunch of totally useless sensors and fire controls, but eventually it might make one that actually fits some need you have, you could then use that system in your designs.
In order to not clutter your class design and ship systems page you might need a new window listing available components from the CIVs, sortable by company and type, the systems should go obsolete after a year or more if you don't use them. From this window you could select a component and use a button labeled "Obtain License for this system" or something, which allows you to use it in your designs, BUT it should cost more than if you had designed the thing yourself, I mean they have to fund their labs somehow right?
For added complexity you might make the CIV shipping companies contract out new ship systems to CIV research LABS when they start popping up, for instance say the AI designs a new sorium harvester which needs a larger engine then any ships the company already has, if there are no power and propulsion labs around then the game just does whatever it is it already does now, but if there happens to be a P&P lab somewhere, then the shipping company sends that new system to them. After the system has been designed then for every ship that company launches using the system the Engine company makes royalties equal to say 20% the cost of the engine, AND you make some tax credits. Then like CMC's or shipping companies they can expand when they get enough capital. Also they become a source of income but only as long as you have a thriving shipping industry. Perhaps you could abstract out the tax income in order to reduce complexity/required coding, also it would allow all types of CIVs to provide revenue not just those being used by the shipping companies.
" Why is this godforsaken hellhole worth dying for? "
". . .  We know nothing about them, their language, their history or what they look like.  But we can assume this.  They stand for everything we don't stand for.  Also they told me you guys look like dorks. "
"Stop exploding, you cowards.  "