Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Please read the rules before you post!


Topic Summary

Posted by: Erik L
« on: March 18, 2016, 10:16:15 AM »

I think it was trying to communicate.

The AI needs to step up its game in that case.
Posted by: Vandermeer
« on: March 18, 2016, 10:15:30 AM »

Thought I'd gotten all of those.
I think it was trying to communicate.
Posted by: Erik L
« on: March 18, 2016, 10:04:51 AM »

Thought I'd gotten all of those.
Posted by: Erik L
« on: August 19, 2014, 12:42:41 PM »

{{av}} at the top. I still need to add version namespaces to the localsettings... Which puts me in mind of another discussion.
Posted by: Whitecold
« on: August 19, 2014, 12:36:21 AM »

I would if I knew how to use that fancy new template.
Posted by: Erik L
« on: August 18, 2014, 10:26:05 PM »

Going to include version info?
Posted by: Whitecold
« on: August 18, 2014, 04:34:26 PM »

So, I worked over the http://aurorawiki.pentarch.org/index.php?title=Lasers page. While the wording is improvable, I'd overwork the other component pages in a similar style if this seems good to you all.
Posted by: milki
« on: August 17, 2014, 12:35:56 AM »

Quote from: Whitecold link=topic=7425. msg75356#msg75356 date=1408202624
I'm not sure what you are trying to tell with the two different Templates

I was trying to point out an example of what the analysis pages would be linked from which would the left side of the template list - basic systems, power and propulsion, etc.  Some of them are currently analysis pages, but some are just lists of whats on the right hand side.

Quote from: Whitecold link=topic=7425. msg75356#msg75356 date=1408202624
Also I don't intend to split up the analysis pages where people compared sensors/beams/whatever, only the info directly pulled from the game.

Excellent.  I was worried you might be splitting up analysis too.
Posted by: Whitecold
« on: August 16, 2014, 10:23:44 AM »

I'm not sure what you are trying to tell with the two different Templates, one is a newer version of the other, so they are similar. Can you elaborate?
Also I don't intend to split up the analysis pages where people compared sensors/beams/whatever, only the info directly pulled from the game.
Posted by: milki
« on: August 16, 2014, 09:10:40 AM »

I think pages about multiple components like beam weapon ranges would still be useful for general compare/contrast and overall information about the technology.     It would serve a different purpose from the component pages though.  If we look at the new Template:Components (hxxp: aurorawiki. pentarch. org/index. php?title=Template:Components&oldid=4938), it would be more like a component topic header like we have linked in old Template:Components (hxxp: aurorawiki. pentarch. org/index. php?title=Template:Components&oldid=4401).
Posted by: ComradeMicha
« on: August 16, 2014, 07:05:45 AM »

I'd love this, and in fact I have proposed splitting up the wiki component pages myself before. 
However, whether I am in line with majority thinking I can't say.  ;)

From me there's a clear "go ahead"!
Posted by: Whitecold
« on: August 16, 2014, 03:55:06 AM »

Looking over the wiki I had the idea of collecting all components in a single component template, and then split up all the pages combining info about many different components like beam weapon ranges onto the individual component pages.
However I'd like to know what others think before I go around restructuring and deleting pages.