Author Topic: Dust with no Atmosphere?  (Read 972 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline IanD (OP)

  • Registered
  • Commodore
  • **********
  • Posts: 725
  • Thanked: 20 times
Dust with no Atmosphere?
« on: May 14, 2020, 08:45:15 AM »
I am asking because I don't know, but would dust kicked up by orbital bombardment stay up for an appreciable time in a vacuum? I guess it could be re-suspended if an atmosphere is created but more probably would form some sort of accretion if left in vacuum for a few months.

Perhaps some budding astronomer could provide an answer.
IanD
 

Offline SpikeTheHobbitMage

  • Bug Moderators
  • Commodore
  • ***
  • S
  • Posts: 670
  • Thanked: 159 times
Re: Dust with no Atmosphere?
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2020, 09:01:43 AM »
I am asking because I don't know, but would dust kicked up by orbital bombardment stay up for an appreciable time in a vacuum? I guess it could be re-suspended if an atmosphere is created but more probably would form some sort of accretion if left in vacuum for a few months.

Perhaps some budding astronomer could provide an answer.
It shouldn't.  Without air to hold it up the dust should be purely ballistic.  Anything that doesn't achieve orbit* or escape velocity should fall within a couple of hours at most, depending on local gravity.  A super-bolide like what killed the dinosaurs hitting a high gravity world like Earth can put up enough material that it takes a couple of weeks to clear, but an orbital bombardment shouldn't be anywhere near that scale.

That said, while I haven't tried it, I don't think that Aurora takes any of that into account.

*Orbit on airless worlds tends to mean 'high enough to clear obstacles'.