Author Topic: Automatic naming for Sol  (Read 1863 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve Walmsley (OP)

  • Aurora Designer
  • Star Marshal
  • S
  • Posts: 11678
  • Thanked: 20471 times
Automatic naming for Sol
« on: September 12, 2008, 11:50:27 AM »
At the moment, if you create 2 or more Empires in the Sol system, only the first Empire has all the correct names for the planets. In v3.2, any Empire created in an existing Sol system will have all the correct names for the planets and moons, which should make life a little easier.

Steve
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Steve Walmsley »
 

Offline Kurt

  • Gold Supporter
  • Vice Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thanked: 3389 times
  • 2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
Re: Automatic naming for Sol
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2008, 01:04:04 PM »
Quote from: "Steve Walmsley"
At the moment, if you create 2 or more Empires in the Sol system, only the first Empire has all the correct names for the planets. In v3.2, any Empire created in an existing Sol system will have all the correct names for the planets and moons, which should make life a little easier.

Steve


Ah, continuing to play around with the multiple human government theme?

 :? .

Ah, well, so it goes.  

Kurt
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Kurt »
 

Offline Steve Walmsley (OP)

  • Aurora Designer
  • Star Marshal
  • S
  • Posts: 11678
  • Thanked: 20471 times
Re: Automatic naming for Sol
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2008, 05:59:31 PM »
Quote from: "Kurt"
Quote from: "Steve Walmsley"
At the moment, if you create 2 or more Empires in the Sol system, only the first Empire has all the correct names for the planets. In v3.2, any Empire created in an existing Sol system will have all the correct names for the planets and moons, which should make life a little easier.

Steve

Ah, continuing to play around with the multiple human government theme?

 :? .

However, if you hadn't played the multiple human race campaign, you wouldn't have inspired me to look at similar scenarios and therefore no improvements for multiple governments. Catch-22 :)

Steve
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Steve Walmsley »
 

Offline IanD

  • Registered
  • Commodore
  • **********
  • Posts: 725
  • Thanked: 20 times
(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2008, 06:44:38 AM »
I have just started a three power game. One thing I have noticed is that scanning in such an environment is very powerful. it somehow seems wrong to get a tech through repeated scans. Sure it should give you a big leg up, but at some stage you should need some R&D. would a 50-75% limit not be more reasonable?

Kurt in is 6 powers game managed it by introducing a treaty in the preamble but is there not a better way?

Regards
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by IanD »
IanD
 

Offline MWadwell

  • Commander
  • *********
  • Posts: 328
  • Thanked: 1 times
(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2008, 06:57:12 AM »
Quote from: "IanD"
I have just started a three power game. One thing I have noticed is that scanning in such an environment is very powerful. it somehow seems wrong to get a tech through repeated scans. Sure it should give you a big leg up, but at some stage you should need some R&D. would a 50-75% limit not be more reasonable?

Kurt in is 6 powers game managed it by introducing a treaty in the preamble but is there not a better way?

Regards


I agree - I find it unrealistic that by simply scanning something you gain the ability to design and manufacture a new technology....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by MWadwell »
Later,
Matt
 

Offline Kurt

  • Gold Supporter
  • Vice Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thanked: 3389 times
  • 2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2008, 12:56:09 AM »
Quote from: "IanD"
I have just started a three power game. One thing I have noticed is that scanning in such an environment is very powerful. it somehow seems wrong to get a tech through repeated scans. Sure it should give you a big leg up, but at some stage you should need some R&D. would a 50-75% limit not be more reasonable?

Kurt in is 6 powers game managed it by introducing a treaty in the preamble but is there not a better way?

Regards


Well...on the one tentacle there is precedent, in Starfire you could get tech info by close in scans.  Also, knowing that something could be done, and actually seeing it done, ought to give a leg up to R&D.  

However, on the other tentacle, I agree that this just seems too powerful.  I was thinking about suggesting that the scanning might not work if the scanned unit's shields were up?  

Kurt
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Kurt »
 

Offline MWadwell

  • Commander
  • *********
  • Posts: 328
  • Thanked: 1 times
(No subject)
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2008, 02:05:48 AM »
Quote from: "Kurt"
Quote from: "IanD"
I have just started a three power game. One thing I have noticed is that scanning in such an environment is very powerful. it somehow seems wrong to get a tech through repeated scans. Sure it should give you a big leg up, but at some stage you should need some R&D. would a 50-75% limit not be more reasonable?

Kurt in is 6 powers game managed it by introducing a treaty in the preamble but is there not a better way?

Regards

Well...on the one tentacle there is precedent, in Starfire you could get tech info by close in scans.  Also, knowing that something could be done, and actually seeing it done, ought to give a leg up to R&D.  

However, on the other tentacle, I agree that this just seems too powerful.  I was thinking about suggesting that the scanning might not work if the scanned unit's shields were up?  

Kurt


Just to clarify the first tentacle - in Starfire, even after you have scanned it, you still needed to research it before you can construct it....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by MWadwell »
Later,
Matt
 

Offline Kurt

  • Gold Supporter
  • Vice Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thanked: 3389 times
  • 2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
(No subject)
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2008, 11:17:05 AM »
Quote from: "MWadwell"
Quote from: "Kurt"
Quote from: "IanD"
I have just started a three power game. One thing I have noticed is that scanning in such an environment is very powerful. it somehow seems wrong to get a tech through repeated scans. Sure it should give you a big leg up, but at some stage you should need some R&D. would a 50-75% limit not be more reasonable?

Kurt in is 6 powers game managed it by introducing a treaty in the preamble but is there not a better way?

Regards

Well...on the one tentacle there is precedent, in Starfire you could get tech info by close in scans.  Also, knowing that something could be done, and actually seeing it done, ought to give a leg up to R&D.  

However, on the other tentacle, I agree that this just seems too powerful.  I was thinking about suggesting that the scanning might not work if the scanned unit's shields were up?  

Kurt

Just to clarify the first tentacle - in Starfire, even after you have scanned it, you still needed to research it before you can construct it....


That's true.  Hmmm...maybe instead of giving actual points towards completion of research, or even completing the research completely, maybe scanning should give a bonus to the research RATE.  In other words, research at normal rate is 1x, if scanned the rate is 1.25x, and if a close or long-term scan is completed the rate is 1.5x.  

I still think having your shields up should block scans.  

Kurt
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Kurt »
 

Offline Steve Walmsley (OP)

  • Aurora Designer
  • Star Marshal
  • S
  • Posts: 11678
  • Thanked: 20471 times
(No subject)
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2008, 04:39:23 AM »
Quote from: "Kurt"
Well...on the one tentacle there is precedent, in Starfire you could get tech info by close in scans.  Also, knowing that something could be done, and actually seeing it done, ought to give a leg up to R&D.  

However, on the other tentacle, I agree that this just seems too powerful.  I was thinking about suggesting that the scanning might not work if the scanned unit's shields were up?  

There are several reasons for this rule, some to do with realism and some to make gameplay more fun.
1) There needs to be some advantage to getting detailed scans of alien ships
2) It gives races that are badly outclassed a chance to catch up over time if you can get the data to a laboratory.
3) It creates a reason for recon missions to learn about the potential enemy (US Subs lurking in the Barents sea, U2 missions over the Soviet Union or Russian Trawlers in the Atlantic)
4) It creates tension between races and a potential reason for conflict, which always makes things more interesting

There are also some reasons why it is perhaps not as unrealistic as you might think. All the major powers on Earth are relatively equal in technology and one of the major reasons for that is they spy on one another, steal technology and closely monitor each other's hardware.  In other words, once someone develops something, it doesn't take long for other countries to get it. In Aurora you can get a maximum of 10% from one successful scan (and usually less than that) so it takes time to get enough information to gain a technology. That time can be thought of the time required to assimilate the information.

With regard to shields. At the moment, putting your shields up just makes it easier for the enemy to learn about your shields :). However, making it harder to scan a ship with shields up (apart from the shield technology), does make sense. Therefore for the next version at least 1 point of active shields will prevent the following:

General scans of internal systems using active sensors
Scans of engines using thermal sensors

Active shields will not prevent:
Scans of active shields using EM sensors
Scans of active sensors using EM Sensors
Scans of active ECM and ECCM systems
Scans of weapons that are firing

Steve
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Steve Walmsley »
 

Offline Steve Walmsley (OP)

  • Aurora Designer
  • Star Marshal
  • S
  • Posts: 11678
  • Thanked: 20471 times
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2008, 04:42:02 AM »
Quote from: "MWadwell"
Just to clarify the first tentacle - in Starfire, even after you have scanned it, you still needed to research it before you can construct it....

In Aurora, unlike Starfire, you can't just scan it once and learn about it. You are going to need a minimum of ten successfuls scans over a period of time and probably more than twenty. The time required to gain the information would be at least as long as the research time in Starfire

Steve
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Steve Walmsley »
 

Offline Erik L

  • Administrator
  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • *****
  • Posts: 5657
  • Thanked: 372 times
  • Forum Admin
  • Discord Username: icehawke
  • 2020 Supporter 2020 Supporter : Donate for 2020
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
(No subject)
« Reply #10 on: September 21, 2008, 11:47:39 AM »
Quote from: "Steve Walmsley"
With regard to shields. At the moment, putting your shields up just makes it easier for the enemy to learn about your shields :)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Erik Luken »