This futuristic academy and meeting forum is run by master Luke(n).
I am also in if possible, and I'd want to side with AL here.
We have to clarify the rules in advance though. Like how voting works; do they get even votes, or is it maybe point based, depending on how high ranked some of your representative officers have risen. Or is it all just up to the team, but then there will be favor to more efficient ruling instead of realistic(=somewhat divided) and RP inciting?(though still ok. It just has to be clear how exactly.)
Okay, I will propose something - this isn't set in stone.
All the players are put into one team.
Council of 5 - A 5 person council votes to make the big choices - One top administrator, head of the Navy, Top Scientist, and two "At Large" seats.
This council votes on actions. They can delegate powers as they see fit and organize other bodies or groups as needed (For example, a design board for ships), assign diplomats, and so on.
There would be a list of alternate in case one of the five members is out of town or otherwise unable to post.
All players are allowed to submit ideas or otherwise discuss plans.
Hopefully, for the most part, consensus on plans can be reached by negotiation.
Game start will be 800 million population, 25 research labs, and a extra 80 mines and 20 automines. (I will be boosting the mineral supply on earth, and a conventional start with Trans-Newtonian already researched) Team will have one Naval and one commercial shipyard.
I will run the "other" side. I do hope for some diplomatic play in the race to the stars.
Does this sound like a good proposal?