Author Topic: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion  (Read 30223 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TheDeadlyShoe

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1264
  • Thanked: 58 times
  • Dance Commander
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #165 on: February 20, 2014, 01:23:11 AM »
Would it be possible to get an on/off checkbox for NPR terraforming? I like to play no-terraforming.
 

Offline Kaiser

  • Commander
  • *********
  • K
  • Posts: 317
  • Thanked: 39 times
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #166 on: February 22, 2014, 08:56:29 AM »
Is it possible to have a record of ships destroyed? Something like with name of the ship, class, info about the weapon which destroyed it, date of destruction and position.
This record should be both for human player and AI (for AI only for known ships destroyed).
Maybe it would be not so useful tool, but it would be nice read some statistic info, during boring part of the game ;)
« Last Edit: February 22, 2014, 08:58:38 AM by Kaiser »
 

Offline MarcAFK

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2005
  • Thanked: 134 times
  • ...it's so simple an idiot could have devised it..
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #167 on: February 22, 2014, 10:00:04 AM »
While you're suggesting that, perhaps every event related to the combat which destroyed that ship could be logged, or perhaps under the intelligence window for each ship class all combat events related to the class could be logged, with the game preferring to keep track only of the last fatal combat involving that ship class. But this is a suggestion and actually is in the wrong thread.

Back on topic kinda, I've noticed steve that in your current AAR battles seem to be very AMM dominated, is there a reason for this? I was wondering if there are circumstances where NPR's would prefer to build AMMs over ASMs, and if this is working as intended, I have no problem with the way these battles were going since the results speak for themself, I would assume that equally matched forces facing each other but with one equipped with AMMS only and one with ASMs only would probably leave the advantage to the guys with the AMMs, so any development that causes greater use of AMMs by the enemy can only make the game harder and the enemy smarter.
In fact I think my next topic for the tactical command forum will be related to exactly this.
" Why is this godforsaken hellhole worth dying for? "
". . .  We know nothing about them, their language, their history or what they look like.  But we can assume this.  They stand for everything we don't stand for.  Also they told me you guys look like dorks. "
"Stop exploding, you cowards.  "
 

Offline Garfunkel

  • Registered
  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2788
  • Thanked: 1051 times
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #168 on: March 02, 2014, 02:46:22 PM »
Excellent news about smaller beam FC's. No more gigantic beam FC's at low tech levels, hooray!
 

Offline PaxMondo

  • Chief Petty Officer
  • ***
  • P
  • Posts: 36
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #169 on: March 02, 2014, 05:25:26 PM »
Excellent news about smaller beam FC's. No more gigantic beam FC's at low tech levels, hooray!

Have to admit, looking forward to 6.4.

I know Steve won't say, but do any of you others that have been around here have a guess as when we might see it?
 

Offline Erik L

  • Administrator
  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • *****
  • Posts: 5656
  • Thanked: 366 times
  • Forum Admin
  • Discord Username: icehawke
  • 2020 Supporter 2020 Supporter : Donate for 2020
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #170 on: March 02, 2014, 07:36:23 PM »
Have to admit, looking forward to 6.4.

I know Steve won't say, but do any of you others that have been around here have a guess as when we might see it?

SoonTM

Offline TheDeadlyShoe

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1264
  • Thanked: 58 times
  • Dance Commander
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #171 on: March 02, 2014, 07:59:27 PM »
Long ago the Elder Scrolls predicted the release of 6.4.  No man can say when, for those who peer deeply into the mysteries of the ages are driven mad.
 

Offline Bremen

  • Commodore
  • **********
  • B
  • Posts: 744
  • Thanked: 151 times
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #172 on: March 03, 2014, 12:52:41 AM »
Someday I'll be able to have a primarily carrier and beam fighter based force without it getting laughed at (and blown up by missiles). This is one step further down that road :)
 

Offline boggo2300

  • Registered
  • Rear Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 895
  • Thanked: 16 times
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #173 on: March 03, 2014, 04:10:44 PM »
SoonTM


Someones been spending too much time on the LotRo forums!

Matt
The boggosity of the universe tends towards maximum.
 

Offline Erik L

  • Administrator
  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • *****
  • Posts: 5656
  • Thanked: 366 times
  • Forum Admin
  • Discord Username: icehawke
  • 2020 Supporter 2020 Supporter : Donate for 2020
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #174 on: March 03, 2014, 04:17:48 PM »

Someones been spending too much time on the LotRo forums!

Matt

I am not Sapience. Nor am I a reasonable facsimile. :p And I think I asked you the same thing the first time you popped off a SoonTM here.

Offline boggo2300

  • Registered
  • Rear Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 895
  • Thanked: 16 times
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #175 on: March 04, 2014, 02:35:22 PM »
No,  you're MUCH better at running a forum than he is :)

Matt
The boggosity of the universe tends towards maximum.
 

Offline Britich

  • Petty Officer
  • **
  • B
  • Posts: 20
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #176 on: April 04, 2014, 04:49:26 AM »
Quote from: TheDeadlyShoe link=topic=6537. msg69989#msg69989 date=1392880991
Would it be possible to get an on/off checkbox for NPR terraforming? I like to play no-terraforming.

I agree, I love to play no terraforming so a checkbox would be awesome.
 

Offline Marski

  • Commander
  • *********
  • Posts: 389
  • Thanked: 137 times
Re: Change Log for 6.40 Discussion
« Reply #177 on: May 17, 2014, 02:51:38 PM »
Blessed Steve has done a wonderful work.