A question for those who have been reading regarding the style;
Right now as my focus is on getting to the 'interesting bit', the reports are literally just 'as it happens' readouts of significant events for each empire. I understand these can be a little dull the read, as they lack character, and I hope to remedy that once we get past 2040.
Im considering altering my style at that point, and would like to know what you'd be most interested in;
1) Random snapshots written from various peoples perspectives every few months (grunt here, scientist there, admiral here); something of an attempt to emulate the style used by procyon in his wonderful Nemesis campaign
2) Faction reports with deeper character involvement, expanding on who decided what and why and why this was designed that way instead of that, etc
3) One or two 'main characters' perspectives, most likely people of note within one or two nations militaries
In addition, I could continue the 'event log' style I do right now to back the new stuff up.
Regarding these 'logs', I would be curious to know if you find that there is;
-Not enough detail regarding things, ie you'd like to know every single civilian ship launched, etc, etc.
-A suitable amount of detail.
-Too much detail, and should only focus on the big things, maybe even reduced to monthly reports.
Any opinions on these two questions would be welcome, as it would give me some direction in how to present the events to you.
Thank you,
Elouda
