Author Topic: Game discussion  (Read 17236 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Panopticon

  • Moderator
  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • P
  • Posts: 883
  • Thanked: 37 times
  • Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
Re: Game discussion
« Reply #105 on: December 06, 2011, 05:23:59 AM »
At the moment it is moot though, as we don't really have a governing body or even anyone with regulatory powers, the first step to this would be forming a UN style body of some variety like the organizations from the first game. Though I think a few of us are a lot less cooperative than we were in that one.

Could be fun, the AD is too Xenophobic to propose such a thing, but debate on the matter would be interesting if someone wanted to bring it up.
 

Offline shadenight123

  • Sub-Lieutenant
  • ******
  • Posts: 114
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Gamer's thoughts-my blog
Re: Game discussion
« Reply #106 on: December 06, 2011, 06:01:18 AM »
thats the point of voting: removing weight of people.
vote is the same for everyone.
your vote must have the same weight and value of another individual, that is democracy.
which means that a little justin bieber girl fanatic will have the same vote at eighteen that a phd in maths has.
because democracy considers the masses of individual.
so if there are 2000 of bieber's girls, and only 200 phds in maths, if a bill has to pass to give funding to justin biebers concerts or to mathematics increase, then it's concerts.
because it's democracy, where the mass rules and the smart guys hope for dictatorship.
this is to say, i too prefer a meritocracy, neo italy IS a meritocracy, but if votes must be done, they must be done as they should.
and thats what i am suggesting, there is no need for a ONU or UNO, but a system to guarantee voting matters should be enacted and enabled.
so at the very least, nations could agree to disagree.
people die all the time, it's not a problem.
it is if you're sending them to die.
i'm not. they just need to learn to be better.
at NOT BREATHING ON MARS!?
they need NOT TO CARE!
my blog (updated 17/12/2011) (updated every saturday):
http://shadenight123.blogspot.com/
 

Offline Destra

  • Warrant Officer, Class 1
  • *****
  • Posts: 99
Re: Game discussion
« Reply #107 on: December 06, 2011, 11:51:53 AM »
Whi says it has to be democratic? I know the veil isn't, yes I like hornets :d
 

Offline shadenight123

  • Sub-Lieutenant
  • ******
  • Posts: 114
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Gamer's thoughts-my blog
Re: Game discussion
« Reply #108 on: December 06, 2011, 01:04:49 PM »
it's because we are an ensemble of embassies.
at the very least we understand that mutual destruction is assured.
to say, it's true pdc can shoot down missiles, but we share the same atmosphere.
if the nonspacefaring nations decide for mutual suicide they just need to shoot those missiles at THEMSELVES.
dust and radioactivity would spread around changing the climate and killing nearly everyone.
neo italians have vaults for a few of the population, but not all of it.
the veil is transferring outside of the world, saying that once left her territories could go to "first come first served".
so we could argue: why let her decide if she's going to no longer belong to earth?.
i too was thinking about leaving earth with the entirety of the neo italians, but until another system is discovered, and the technology to find said system are researched, i have to make sure nobody kills nobody.
because it would be a chain reaction for doom.
people die all the time, it's not a problem.
it is if you're sending them to die.
i'm not. they just need to learn to be better.
at NOT BREATHING ON MARS!?
they need NOT TO CARE!
my blog (updated 17/12/2011) (updated every saturday):
http://shadenight123.blogspot.com/
 

Offline Destra

  • Warrant Officer, Class 1
  • *****
  • Posts: 99
Re: Game discussion
« Reply #109 on: December 06, 2011, 02:07:56 PM »
Indeed mutual destruction is assured, the viel itself has enough warheads to reduce the earth to a nuclear wasteland for probably thousands of years, and there are 7 other nations on planet with TN tech, everyone says, one warhead getting through, is bad, I say half my stock getting through will destroy the earth, and sure while I can't fire a thousand missiles in one volley, it will still be a fair amount. Now I imagine you all have similer abilities so, yes earth would be gone.
 

Offline shadenight123

  • Sub-Lieutenant
  • ******
  • Posts: 114
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Gamer's thoughts-my blog
Re: Game discussion
« Reply #110 on: December 06, 2011, 03:59:40 PM »
it's not even a "if they make it through".
they just need to have their warheads explode in their countries.
200 warheads exploding all around the world would dust it to death.
and radioactions would be a world wide phenomon.
people die all the time, it's not a problem.
it is if you're sending them to die.
i'm not. they just need to learn to be better.
at NOT BREATHING ON MARS!?
they need NOT TO CARE!
my blog (updated 17/12/2011) (updated every saturday):
http://shadenight123.blogspot.com/
 

Offline Destra

  • Warrant Officer, Class 1
  • *****
  • Posts: 99
Re: Game discussion
« Reply #111 on: December 06, 2011, 05:06:57 PM »
Hmmm true, they don't even have to fire their warheads then, thus they are infact a ticking timebomb potentially, this is good to know ... :p
 

Offline Destra

  • Warrant Officer, Class 1
  • *****
  • Posts: 99
Re: Game discussion
« Reply #112 on: January 31, 2012, 12:33:27 AM »
had a very busy few days here, not really had much time ... well actually any time to myself, though for this section of time theres not much to report so dont hold your breathe for anything important, though i HOPEFULLY will have it up tomorow, just gotta write when its not 1030 pm :P