Posted by: nuclearslurpee
« on: September 06, 2022, 07:22:28 PM »I use infantry LOG-S for defensive forces, but I had not considered them for assault forces. I'll look into that - since the replacements could be outside of the combat OOB that would sidestep my question about HQ sizing. Is there any advantage to using LOG over LOG-S? The tonnage and costs look to be the same per supply unit, and using LOG-S would let me more closely match the GSP I need per round.
LOG-S are strictly superior as you lose 1/5 as many supplies every time one of them is destroyed by enemy fire. There is literally no reason to use the 50-ton LOG module except on LVH.
I always mod my DB so that the 50-ton LOG is LVH-only, and then double its capacity so that LVH+LOG are actually competitive with INF+LOG-S