Author Topic: Ship size vs building time  (Read 1043 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chairman (OP)

  • Warrant Officer, Class 2
  • ****
  • C
  • Posts: 60
Ship size vs building time
« on: July 20, 2010, 05:01:56 AM »
Not sur if its a bug or not but a bigger ship can bee built faster than a smaller...  :?

My 40000 ton CV takes 0.09 years

Gotland  class Carrier    40300 tons     1234 Crew     4768.4 BP      TCS 806  TH 3250  EM 240
4032 km/s     Armour 6-104     Shields 8-375     Sensors 14/1/0/0     Damage Control Rating 15     PPV 36
Annual Failure Rate: 2598%    IFR: 36.1%    Maint Capacity 1370 MSP    Max Repair 562 MSP    Est Time: 0.09 Years
Hangar Deck Capacity 11000 tons     Magazine 1020    

Internal Confinement Fusion Drive E0.5 (13)    Power 250    Fuel Use 5%    Signature 250    Armour 0    Exp 1%
Fuel Capacity 50,000 Litres    Range 44.7 billion km   (128 days at full power)
Delta R375/12.5 Shields (3)   Total Fuel Cost  38 Litres per day

Twin 12cm C6 Ultraviolet Laser Turret (1x2)    Range 160,000km     TS: 10000 km/s     Power 8-12     RM 4    ROF 5        4 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 1 1
Twin 10cm C6 Ultraviolet Laser Turret (1x2)    Range 120,000km     TS: 10000 km/s     Power 6-12     RM 4    ROF 5        3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1
Twin 15cm C6 Ultraviolet Laser Turret (1x2)    Range 240,000km     TS: 10000 km/s     Power 12-12     RM 4    ROF 5        6 6 6 6 4 4 3 3 2 2
CIWS-250 (4x10)    Range 1000 km     TS: 25000 km/s     ROF 5       Base 50% To Hit
Fire Control S08 300-12500 (1)    Max Range: 600,000 km   TS: 12500 km/s     98 97 95 93 92 90 88 87 85 83
Tokamak Fusion Reactor Technology PB-1 AR-0 Standard (5)     Total Power Output 40    Armour 0    Exp 5%

Missile Fire Control FC92-R10 (1)     Range 92.4m km    Resolution 10

Active Search Sensor MR99-R500 (1)     GPS 9000     Range 99.0m km    Resolution 500
Thermal Sensor TH1-14 (1)     Sensitivity 14     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  14m km

ECCM-4 (1)         ECM 20

This design is classed as a military vessel for maintenance purposes


My 800 ton Fighter takes 16.27 years

J-29 "Flygande Tunnan" class Fighter    800 tons     44 Crew     138 BP      TCS 16  TH 60  EM 0
3750 km/s     Armour 3-7     Shields 0-0     Sensors 1/1/0/0     Damage Control Rating 1     PPV 7.5
Annual Failure Rate: 5%    IFR: 0.1%    Maint Capacity 108 MSP    Max Repair 15 MSP    Est Time: 16.27 Years
Magazine 50    

FTR Internal Confinement Fusion Drive E500 (1)    Power 60    Fuel Use 5000%    Signature 60    Armour 0    Exp 25%
Fuel Capacity 5,000 Litres    Range 0.2 billion km   (16 hours at full power)

Size 10 Box Launcher (5)    Missile Size 10    Hangar Reload 75 minutes    MF Reload 12.5 hours
Missile Fire Control FC36-R155 FTR (1)     Range 36.8m km    Resolution 155

Active Search Sensor MR40-R340 FTR (1)     GPS 3672     Range 40.4m km    Resolution 340

Compact ECCM-1 (1)         ECM 10

This design is classed as a military vessel for maintenance purposes
 

Offline UnLimiTeD

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • U
  • Posts: 1108
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Ship size vs building time
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2010, 05:36:20 AM »
"Est Time:" is the time until maintenance supplies will likely run out, aka, it breaks.
The build time is shown on the left side, in the interface.
Your carrier will just last only a month.
 

Offline waresky

  • Registered
  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1486
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • Alpine Mountaineer..ohh Yeah!
Re: Ship size vs building time
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2010, 08:01:40 AM »
Guys..a "serious" ships are play in "Maintenance MOde ON".
:D..

0.09 and SUPPLY (eat and spares) run out:))..
tooo easy this way ma friend
 

Offline Chairman (OP)

  • Warrant Officer, Class 2
  • ****
  • C
  • Posts: 60
Re: Ship size vs building time
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2010, 09:27:38 AM »
Hmmm, i missed that :oops:  was sure it was building time... Sorry.