4X for Ever
Posts:
Recents
.
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Changes
Home
Help
Search
Posts
Recents
Calendar
Staff List
Login
Register
Aurora 4x
»
New Players
»
The Academy
»
Ship size vs building time
« previous
next »
Reply
Send this topic
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Ship size vs building time (Read 1043 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Chairman
(OP)
Warrant Officer, Class 2
C
Posts: 60
Ship size vs building time
«
on:
July 20, 2010, 05:01:56 AM »
Quote
Not sur if its a bug or not but a bigger ship can bee built faster than a smaller...
My 40000 ton CV takes 0.09 years
Gotland class Carrier 40300 tons 1234 Crew 4768.4 BP TCS 806 TH 3250 EM 240
4032 km/s Armour 6-104 Shields 8-375 Sensors 14/1/0/0 Damage Control Rating 15 PPV 36
Annual Failure Rate: 2598% IFR: 36.1% Maint Capacity 1370 MSP Max Repair 562 MSP Est Time: 0.09 Years
Hangar Deck Capacity 11000 tons Magazine 1020
Internal Confinement Fusion Drive E0.5 (13) Power 250 Fuel Use 5% Signature 250 Armour 0 Exp 1%
Fuel Capacity 50,000 Litres Range 44.7 billion km (128 days at full power)
Delta R375/12.5 Shields (3) Total Fuel Cost 38 Litres per day
Twin 12cm C6 Ultraviolet Laser Turret (1x2) Range 160,000km TS: 10000 km/s Power 8-12 RM 4 ROF 5 4 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 1 1
Twin 10cm C6 Ultraviolet Laser Turret (1x2) Range 120,000km TS: 10000 km/s Power 6-12 RM 4 ROF 5 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1
Twin 15cm C6 Ultraviolet Laser Turret (1x2) Range 240,000km TS: 10000 km/s Power 12-12 RM 4 ROF 5 6 6 6 6 4 4 3 3 2 2
CIWS-250 (4x10) Range 1000 km TS: 25000 km/s ROF 5 Base 50% To Hit
Fire Control S08 300-12500 (1) Max Range: 600,000 km TS: 12500 km/s 98 97 95 93 92 90 88 87 85 83
Tokamak Fusion Reactor Technology PB-1 AR-0 Standard (5) Total Power Output 40 Armour 0 Exp 5%
Missile Fire Control FC92-R10 (1) Range 92.4m km Resolution 10
Active Search Sensor MR99-R500 (1) GPS 9000 Range 99.0m km Resolution 500
Thermal Sensor TH1-14 (1) Sensitivity 14 Detect Sig Strength 1000: 14m km
ECCM-4 (1) ECM 20
This design is classed as a military vessel for maintenance purposes
My 800 ton Fighter takes 16.27 years
J
-29 "Flygande Tunnan" class Fighter 800 tons 44 Crew 138 BP TCS 16 TH 60 EM 0
3750 km/s Armour 3-7 Shields 0-0 Sensors 1/1/0/0 Damage Control Rating 1 PPV 7.5
Annual Failure Rate: 5% IFR: 0.1% Maint Capacity 108 MSP Max Repair 15 MSP Est Time: 16.27 Years
Magazine 50
FTR Internal Confinement Fusion Drive E500 (1) Power 60 Fuel Use 5000% Signature 60 Armour 0 Exp 25%
Fuel Capacity 5,000 Litres Range 0.2 billion km (16 hours at full power)
Size 10 Box Launcher (5) Missile Size 10 Hangar Reload 75 minutes MF Reload 12.5 hours
Missile Fire Control FC36-R155 FTR (1) Range 36.8m km Resolution 155
Active Search Sensor MR40-R340 FTR (1) GPS 3672 Range 40.4m km Resolution 340
Compact ECCM-1 (1) ECM 10
This design is classed as a military vessel for maintenance purposes
Report to moderator
Logged
UnLimiTeD
Vice Admiral
U
Posts: 1108
Thanked: 1 times
Re: Ship size vs building time
«
Reply #1 on:
July 20, 2010, 05:36:20 AM »
Quote
"Est Time:" is the time until maintenance supplies will likely run out, aka, it breaks.
The build time is shown on the left side, in the interface.
Your carrier will just last only a month.
Report to moderator
Logged
waresky
Registered
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1486
Thanked: 8 times
Alpine Mountaineer..ohh Yeah!
Re: Ship size vs building time
«
Reply #2 on:
July 20, 2010, 08:01:40 AM »
Quote
Guys..a "serious" ships are play in "Maintenance MOde ON".
..
0.09 and SUPPLY (eat and spares) run out:))..
tooo easy this way ma friend
Report to moderator
Logged
Chairman
(OP)
Warrant Officer, Class 2
C
Posts: 60
Re: Ship size vs building time
«
Reply #3 on:
July 20, 2010, 09:27:38 AM »
Quote
Hmmm, i missed that
was sure it was building time... Sorry.
Report to moderator
Logged
Reply
Send this topic
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Aurora 4x
»
New Players
»
The Academy
»
Ship size vs building time
It appears that you have not registered with
Aurora 4x
. To register, please click here...
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...