Conversely also probably will have a pretty good idea of where you are landing so they might not have much issue contesting your attempted landing.
In the scenario where one side has control over space and the other side has control over ground, it seems to me that the space side can fairly easily target anything moving on the surface or flying in the air. Things which are dug in are harder to pinpoint and destroy.
Therefore any movement or redeployment by the ground based side in order to contest landing sites will cause them to be exposed to potential attack from space. So although they might have a good idea of where you are landing, a sensible general would avoid exposing his or her troops.
I'm sure there are 100's of gotcha scenarios where disembarking troops can get shot at and therefore maybe Eisenhower wants to stay in orbit rather than risk getting muddy but Aurora does not model them. A whole 20kT division shows up in a single 5s increment rather than individual infantrymen getting ferried down in cargo shuttles which presumably ought to be finite, consume fuel and be target-able by AA or STO's but only the ones which can see them over the curvature of the planet in hypothetical the world where Aurora models everything down to the last minute detail.
Unless someone comes up with a proposal that is concrete, reasonably balanced (or becomes so through discussion) and interests Steve it isn't relevant because it isn't modelled.
I would like to be able to see Naval and Ground OOB linked in some way but I haven't got a proper idea of how to do it so I'm not going to waste everyone's time by making a bunch of posts about it until I do.