Author Topic: Aurora in the wild  (Read 2360 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Erik L (OP)

  • Administrator
  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • *****
  • Posts: 5656
  • Thanked: 366 times
  • Forum Admin
  • Discord Username: icehawke
  • 2020 Supporter 2020 Supporter : Donate for 2020
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
Aurora in the wild
« on: October 19, 2016, 03:24:21 PM »

Offline 83athom

  • Big Ship Commander
  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1261
  • Thanked: 86 times
Re: Aurora in the wild
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2016, 04:49:30 PM »
No. It would be interesting if the system view we have can eventually get that complex/advanced.
Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life.
 

Offline MarcAFK

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2005
  • Thanked: 134 times
  • ...it's so simple an idiot could have devised it..
Re: Aurora in the wild
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2016, 01:29:21 AM »
Ive seen images like that before, confusing untill i realise the asteroids are wrong, but weird coincidence about the interface colours.
" Why is this godforsaken hellhole worth dying for? "
". . .  We know nothing about them, their language, their history or what they look like.  But we can assume this.  They stand for everything we don't stand for.  Also they told me you guys look like dorks. "
"Stop exploding, you cowards.  "
 

Offline bitbucket

  • Chief Petty Officer
  • ***
  • b
  • Posts: 44
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Aurora in the wild
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2016, 01:09:10 AM »
Mostly coincidental design choices. I mean, come on, elliptical orbits? That's craycray, man.
 

Offline MarcAFK

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2005
  • Thanked: 134 times
  • ...it's so simple an idiot could have devised it..
Re: Aurora in the wild
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2016, 06:05:02 AM »
Image search brings me to this page: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikijunior:Solar_System/Asteroid_belt . The source states:
" This image is based on data found in the en:JPL DE-405 ephemeris, and the en:Minor Planet Center database of asteroids (etc) published 2006 Jul 6. The image is looking down on the en:ecliptic plane as would have been seen on 2006 August 14. It was rendered by custom software written for Wikipedia."
2006? Interesting coincidence considering how old Aurora is.
" Why is this godforsaken hellhole worth dying for? "
". . .  We know nothing about them, their language, their history or what they look like.  But we can assume this.  They stand for everything we don't stand for.  Also they told me you guys look like dorks. "
"Stop exploding, you cowards.  "
 

Offline TMaekler

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1112
  • Thanked: 298 times
Re: Aurora in the wild
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2016, 06:10:21 AM »
"Sir, the probe we send out to explore all system bodies has finished its task."

"Didn't we send that out 112 years ago?"

"Yes, Sir."

"Gosh, and that was only our own solar system... ."

-----------------------------------------------------------
"How long is the game calculating one 5-day-cycle?"

"Well, last time it took over 25 minutes."

"At least it is not real-time - yet."  ;D

"Steve has promised to deliver C# before that happens... ."  :P
« Last Edit: December 28, 2016, 06:12:41 AM by TMaekler »
 
The following users thanked this post: Nori

Offline Steve Walmsley

  • Aurora Designer
  • Star Marshal
  • S
  • Posts: 11657
  • Thanked: 20375 times
Re: Aurora in the wild
« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2016, 07:50:29 AM »
I could have the view that complex - it is only a case of generating more asteroids.

However, I have to draw a line somewhere :)
 
The following users thanked this post: Drgong

Offline MarcAFK

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2005
  • Thanked: 134 times
  • ...it's so simple an idiot could have devised it..
Re: Aurora in the wild
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2016, 12:09:06 AM »
A couple of trojans and greeks would be a nice addition, just a couple to create the right visual effect. But theres no need to go crazy and give them libration around the lagrange points too.... 
" Why is this godforsaken hellhole worth dying for? "
". . .  We know nothing about them, their language, their history or what they look like.  But we can assume this.  They stand for everything we don't stand for.  Also they told me you guys look like dorks. "
"Stop exploding, you cowards.  "
 

Offline Steve Walmsley

  • Aurora Designer
  • Star Marshal
  • S
  • Posts: 11657
  • Thanked: 20375 times
Re: Aurora in the wild
« Reply #8 on: December 30, 2016, 09:08:08 AM »
A couple of trojans and greeks would be a nice addition, just a couple to create the right visual effect. But theres no need to go crazy and give them libration around the lagrange points too....

There are already about fifty Trojans and Greeks in Sol :)
 

Offline MarcAFK

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2005
  • Thanked: 134 times
  • ...it's so simple an idiot could have devised it..
Re: Aurora in the wild
« Reply #9 on: December 31, 2016, 09:57:13 AM »
I'm an idiot, I haven't played for a few months but even so how could I forget the blatantly obvious groups following Jupiter around?
" Why is this godforsaken hellhole worth dying for? "
". . .  We know nothing about them, their language, their history or what they look like.  But we can assume this.  They stand for everything we don't stand for.  Also they told me you guys look like dorks. "
"Stop exploding, you cowards.  "
 

Offline alex_brunius

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1240
  • Thanked: 153 times
Re: Aurora in the wild
« Reply #10 on: January 02, 2017, 08:56:49 AM »
There are already about fifty Trojans and Greeks in Sol :)

That many Trojans must be the explanation why my Antivirus dislike Aurora so much  ;D 8)