Posted by: Blogaugis
« on: March 02, 2022, 12:19:32 PM »Either way, TL:DR discussion summed up between OP and Steve is this:
While I agree with most of the KriegsMeister's points, the idea of reducing exceptions and making all follow the same rules is the general direction, Steve replied, that the reason why Aurora4x is what it is, is mostly due to reducing micromanagement.
Thus, it is now a Unified ruleset versus less micromanagement. Compromises had to be made, as it would be too annoying to look after your terraforming stations - delivering them the MSPs in one way or another...
So, it is likely that commercial/military designations will stay, fighters will stay, stations will stay...
The choices that average players have is - setting of 'maintenance use' box,
and database editing.
While I agree with most of the KriegsMeister's points, the idea of reducing exceptions and making all follow the same rules is the general direction, Steve replied, that the reason why Aurora4x is what it is, is mostly due to reducing micromanagement.
Thus, it is now a Unified ruleset versus less micromanagement. Compromises had to be made, as it would be too annoying to look after your terraforming stations - delivering them the MSPs in one way or another...
So, it is likely that commercial/military designations will stay, fighters will stay, stations will stay...
The choices that average players have is - setting of 'maintenance use' box,
and database editing.