Aurora 4x
C# Aurora => C# Bureau of Design => Topic started by: macks on April 30, 2020, 04:56:27 PM
-
Here's my new CL, its job is to poke at things with its 300mm lasers, and rapidly close in with the 150mm lasers that cycle every 5 seconds. 33% of her displacement is engines, so she can rapidly close distance between enemies. For defense, there's 5 layers of armor, 4 twin gauss cannon turrets firing 5 shots every interval at 25% accuracy, two turrets per short range beam fire control for multiple missile launches. Also included is an improved damage control, which can repair things I'm told. There's two reactors and two engines for added redundancy. Her place in the fleet is something resilient with enough firepower to hold its own while being able to protect others somewhat as well. The fleet doctrine includes fast tanker/supply ship hybrids which supplement the lacking maintenance supply and range. Let me know what you guys think!
Absolute class Light Cruiser 10 000 tons 320 Crew 3 409 BP TCS 200 TH 2 475 EM 0
12375 km/s Armour 5-41 Shields 0-0 HTK 80 Sensors 0/0/0/0 DCR 25 PPV 57.96
Maint Life 4.50 Years MSP 5 205 AFR 160% IFR 2.2% 1YR 416 5YR 6 245 Max Repair 618.75 MSP
Commander Control Rating 1 BRG
Intended Deployment Time: 6 months Morale Check Required
Central Engineworks Magnetic Fusion Drive EP1237.50 (2) Power 2475.0 Fuel Use 45.51% Signature 1237.50 Explosion 15%
Fuel Capacity 1 000 000 Litres Range 39.6 billion km (36 days at full power)
Optics Division 300mm C6XR Laser (2) Range 480 000km TS: 12 375 km/s Power 24-6 RM 70 000 km ROF 20
Optics Division 150mm C6FU Laser (4) Range 300 000km TS: 12 375 km/s Power 6-6 RM 50 000 km ROF 5
Twin Rheinmetall GC Turret Block II (4x10) Range 50 000km TS: 20000 km/s Power 0-0 RM 50 000 km ROF 5
Optics Division LRBFC Block II (1) Max Range: 480 000 km TS: 9 375 km/s 98 96 94 92 90 88 85 83 81 79
Optics Division SRBFC Block II (2) Max Range: 120 000 km TS: 25 000 km/s 92 83 75 67 58 50 42 33 25 17
Central Engineworks MCF Reactor R20 (2) Total Power Output 40.4 Exp 5%
Raytheon AMMS16-R1 Block II (1) GPS 48 Range 16.6m km MCR 1.8m km Resolution 1
This design is classed as a Military Vessel for maintenance purposes
-
It is generally a good design but it is a bit of a glass cannon. Five levels of armour will not be very effective at this level of technology if you faced off against someone your own calibre. You have no shields so you can't use hit and run very effectively and are very susceptible to microwave weapons. The weak armour also make you weak against Meson weapons.
The ship is very fast so you are likely to be able to dictate the engagement but have very little in the the way of point defence so will have to rely on some escort for that, will they also be this fast?!?
The ship also have a bit more Maintenance life than I think is necessary for a ship with only a 6 month deployment time.
-
just remember this cruiser is light, and light things dont fare well against big guns. overall its very good, and considering you are puting this together with supply ships and tankers, I have to put in check your 6 months deployment time... you will not run out of supply or fuel on these 6 months. this ship could actually cruise for quite the while, and fare well even in 1 year deployments, if it stays put and doesn't burn all the fuel. unless you are exploring far with these boys, in which case well done, this is pretty good. If you bring along a "carrier" with the hangar space to fit this in you can even repair it on the spot.
-
two turrets per short range beam fire control for multiple missile launches
In case you aren't aware, you don't necessarily need multiple point defense beam fire controls to engage multiple salvos anymore in C#. That was a big deal in VB, but now a single beam fire control can engage as many missile salvos as you have weapons. It's not bad to have an extra one for redundancy but good to know if you get around to building dedicated point defense ships. You can save a LOT of space.
-
I also noticed that you have no ECM or ECCM... that could actually be a huge problem at this level of technology.
-
What should I remove to make space for shields/armor/ECM/ECCM? Also, I'm not certain how shields work. How should I design shields for something this size?
-
Your long-range beam fire controls have only three-quarters the tracking speed of your lasers, while the short-range beam fire controls have five-quarters the tracking speed of your gauss turrets. Having a better fire control than your current weapons can be a useful way to build in upgrade potential, but with the split you're definitely wasting resources on at least one of them.
-
The weak armour also make you weak against Meson weapons.
Kind of off-topic, but nothing's weak against mesons. After 4,000 research points spent on armor retardation tech, you can build a meson that has a 19% chance of penetrating 5 layers of armor, or put those points into laser focal size and build a laser that has a 100% chance. Dump a cool million research points into armor retardation tech and you can max out your chances at just under 70%.
About the only use case for mesons is if an enemy invests a stupid amount into massive, fast-charging shield generators and no armor.
-
The weak armour also make you weak against Meson weapons.
Kind of off-topic, but nothing's weak against mesons. After 4,000 research points spent on armor retardation tech, you can build a meson that has a 19% chance of penetrating 5 layers of armor, or put those points into laser focal size and build a laser that has a 100% chance. Dump a cool million research points into armor retardation tech and you can max out your chances at just under 70%.
About the only use case for mesons is if an enemy invests a stupid amount into massive, fast-charging shield generators and no armor.
I see it as having a role similar to Gauss Canons as secondary weapons, more to maim than to kill, allowing for boarding actions and etc. make some holes with the lasers, slow it down with some mesons, so you dont need to mind the shields, and then land your marines.
but then again, by this point you might as well just keep the shields down with some fire, and blast it with gauss untill your marines can get in safely so...
-
The weak armour also make you weak against Meson weapons.
Kind of off-topic, but nothing's weak against mesons. After 4,000 research points spent on armor retardation tech, you can build a meson that has a 19% chance of penetrating 5 layers of armor, or put those points into laser focal size and build a laser that has a 100% chance. Dump a cool million research points into armor retardation tech and you can max out your chances at just under 70%.
About the only use case for mesons is if an enemy invests a stupid amount into massive, fast-charging shield generators and no armor.
You will have to approach rather close for most lasers to penetrate the armour though. A Meson could do that at a much greater distance and safety.
You most likely are not going to use Meson beams as the only weapon either if you have them.
-
Well that's the point of this particular cruiser, it can't sustain itself very long outside of laser range so its purpose is to use the mass where a meson could go as more engine power to rapidly close the distance and destroy things from 100,000km or so where those 150mm lasers hit maximum damage.
-
Well that's the point of this particular cruiser, it can't sustain itself very long outside of laser range so its purpose is to use the mass where a meson could go as more engine power to rapidly close the distance and destroy things from 100,000km or so where those 150mm lasers hit maximum damage.
The problem is that it is too thinly skinned to approach that close against anything with a decent penetration power itself, at least if it is up against something even close to it's own technology level.
I would give at least about 8 levels of armour at this technology level for a ship of this type and at least some shields as a defence against microwaves if those are around.
-
What should I remove to make space for shields/armor/ECM/ECCM? Also, I'm not certain how shields work. How should I design shields for something this size?
This is probably the closest design I have in my current game, though it's a slightly lower weight class and has a different role, with yours I might be tempted to go with larger shields:
Cerium class Destroyer 7,127 tons 177 Crew 2,107.8 BP TCS 143 TH 1,600 EM 4,230
11226 km/s Armour 16-32 Shields 141-528 HTK 40 Sensors 0/0/0/0 DCR 4 PPV 16
Maint Life 3.39 Years MSP 1,539 AFR 102% IFR 1.4% 1YR 203 5YR 3,050 Max Repair 400 MSP
Commander Control Rating 1 BRG
Intended Deployment Time: 24 months Morale Check Required
Small Standard Magnetic Fusion Drive (2) Power 1600 Fuel Use 68.69% Signature 800 Explosion 16%
Fuel Capacity 750,000 Litres Range 27.6 billion km (28 days at full power)
Medium Standard Gen 7 Shields (1) Recharge Time 528 seconds (0.3 per second)
25cm Heavy Railgun (2x4) Range 300,000km TS: 11,226 km/s Power 15-4 Accuracy Modifier 100% RM 60,000 km ROF 20
Beam Fire Control R320-TS10000 (1) Max Range: 320,000 km TS: 10,000 km/s 97 94 91 88 84 81 78 75 72 69
Magnetic Confinement Fusion Reactor R10 (1) Total Power Output 10 Exp 5%
This design is classed as a Military Vessel for maintenance purposes
This is supposed to take on more of a bouncer role to protect the carrier fleet, it's supposed to be deployed in reasonably large numbers alongside a smaller corvette design to buy time in case the core fleet becomes threatened. I haven't had to use it in it's intended role yet so I can't tell you how well it functions (though I did use it's fleet group to finish off an ailing spoiler ship whilst taking fire from their STOs). But it's definitely tough enough to take a few hits and get into the fight. It was also specifically designed to do this role in relation to the aformentioned spoilers and their particular ship design so take that for what it's worth. For your ship it probaby makes sense to sacrifice the level of protection I put in for more firepower, but it's an idea.
-
I'm currently designing a heavy cruiser and for shields I placed a 750t generator with level 3 regen I think. How much power do shields draw?
-
I'm currently designing a heavy cruiser and for shields I placed a 750t generator with level 3 regen I think. How much power do shields draw?
They have their own internal power plants. Everything does except beam weapons.
-
huh. check that out. thanks!
-
There are a number of different beam ship philosophies.
Parasite battleship/destroyer whatever you call it. Maximum boost engines, perhaps maximum sized for fuel efficiency. Speed is king. No turrets needed. Against some enemies, the enemies will have reduced accuracy if they haven't turreted their main guns. They can either hope to win by absolutely outranging the enemy if they have a tech advantage, or by having a shielding advantage, they come into range, fire, and withdraw out of range again and let their shield regenerate.
Sluggers, designed to be fast enough to close with the enemy, and tough enough to survive doing so. A slugger fleet will incur damage and casualties, but they close to a range bracket where they do more damage than the enemy. Maybe they have a higher dps, or they have a huge burst from reduced sized lasers that they fire at point blank range. As they have to close within enemy weapon range, they generally do not have the time for shield regeneration, so shields would be minor compared to armor. Expect your fleet to be in repairs for a while after the battle, but hey, you get crew grade improvement from taking damage!
Swarm, (no longer as practical with the meson changes), philosophy was that the enemy couldn't split its fire and reliably kill all of them before they did damage.
Beams as support. You have a couple of beams on all of your capital ships, so as to have the ability to finish the enemy after. They exist to prevent free kills by the enemy and to save ordnance.
Point defense ships. In ship to ship combat, they deny the enemy the opportunity to do point blank damage with impugnity.
The Absolute is absolutely a cruiser role. It can reach almost any point in a typical empire without refueling, and possibly without needing refueling to return. That is a pretty long range, and comes at the expense of top speed. If you want a fast responder that can shift to any part of the empire quickly, or can check out the frontier, this can do the job. Whether it can handle the problem once it gets there is a different question.
It can also serve as forward picket for a substantial period of time. In VB6, I preferred using carriers for long endurance picket, because the parasite craft could have the speed advantage over any enemy, while having the endurance of the carrier.
-
Since posting this, all Absolutes have been refitted to their Block II versions.
Absolute Block II class Light Cruiser 10 000 tons 281 Crew 3 239.8 BP TCS 200 TH 2 475 EM 0
12375 km/s Armour 10-41 Shields 0-0 HTK 74 Sensors 0/0/0/0 DCR 25 PPV 47.96
Maint Life 4.40 Years MSP 5 232 AFR 160% IFR 2.2% 1YR 436 5YR 6 539 Max Repair 618.75 MSP
Commander Control Rating 1 BRG
Intended Deployment Time: 6 months Morale Check Required
Central Engineworks Magnetic Fusion Drive EP1237.50 (2) Power 2475.0 Fuel Use 45.51% Signature 1237.5 Explosion 15%
Fuel Capacity 1 001 000 Litres Range 39.6 billion km (37 days at full power)
Optics Division 300mm C6XR Laser (2) Range 480 000km TS: 12 375 km/s Power 24-6 RM 70 000 km ROF 20
Optics Division 150mm C6FU Laser (2) Range 300 000km TS: 12 375 km/s Power 6-6 RM 50 000 km ROF 5
Twin Rheinmetall GC Turret Block II (4x10) Range 50 000km TS: 20000 km/s Power 0-0 RM 50 000 km ROF 5
Optics Division LRBFC Block II (1) Max Range: 480 000 km TS: 9 375 km/s 98 96 94 92 90 88 85 83 81 79
Optics Division SRBFC Block II (1) Max Range: 120 000 km TS: 25 000 km/s 92 83 75 67 58 50 42 33 25 17
Central Engineworks MCF Reactor R20 (1) Total Power Output 20.2 Exp 5%
Black Division MCFR R6-PB30 (1) Total Power Output 6 Exp 15%
Raytheon AMMS16-R1 Block II (1) GPS 48 Range 16.6m km MCR 1.8m km Resolution 1
ECM 10
This design is classed as a Military Vessel for maintenance purposes
This refit included a reduced armament in return for more armor. The active sensor has been refitted and she sports ECM now. These Absolutes have been the mainstay of the fleet; they've destroyed more tonnage in hostile ships than anything else, and none have been destroyed. I'm pretty happy with them. Soon they will become a legacy fleet as my next engine tech arrives and better shields are researched.
-
Since posting this, all Absolutes have been refitted to their Block II versions.
Absolute Block II class Light Cruiser 10 000 tons 281 Crew 3 239.8 BP TCS 200 TH 2 475 EM 0
12375 km/s Armour 10-41 Shields 0-0 HTK 74 Sensors 0/0/0/0 DCR 25 PPV 47.96
Maint Life 4.40 Years MSP 5 232 AFR 160% IFR 2.2% 1YR 436 5YR 6 539 Max Repair 618.75 MSP
Commander Control Rating 1 BRG
Intended Deployment Time: 6 months Morale Check Required
Central Engineworks Magnetic Fusion Drive EP1237.50 (2) Power 2475.0 Fuel Use 45.51% Signature 1237.5 Explosion 15%
Fuel Capacity 1 001 000 Litres Range 39.6 billion km (37 days at full power)
Optics Division 300mm C6XR Laser (2) Range 480 000km TS: 12 375 km/s Power 24-6 RM 70 000 km ROF 20
Optics Division 150mm C6FU Laser (2) Range 300 000km TS: 12 375 km/s Power 6-6 RM 50 000 km ROF 5
Twin Rheinmetall GC Turret Block II (4x10) Range 50 000km TS: 20000 km/s Power 0-0 RM 50 000 km ROF 5
Optics Division LRBFC Block II (1) Max Range: 480 000 km TS: 9 375 km/s 98 96 94 92 90 88 85 83 81 79
Optics Division SRBFC Block II (1) Max Range: 120 000 km TS: 25 000 km/s 92 83 75 67 58 50 42 33 25 17
Central Engineworks MCF Reactor R20 (1) Total Power Output 20.2 Exp 5%
Black Division MCFR R6-PB30 (1) Total Power Output 6 Exp 15%
Raytheon AMMS16-R1 Block II (1) GPS 48 Range 16.6m km MCR 1.8m km Resolution 1
ECM 10
This design is classed as a Military Vessel for maintenance purposes
This refit included a reduced armament in return for more armor. The active sensor has been refitted and she sports ECM now. These Absolutes have been the mainstay of the fleet; they've destroyed more tonnage in hostile ships than anything else, and none have been destroyed. I'm pretty happy with them. Soon they will become a legacy fleet as my next engine tech arrives and better shields are researched.
If you are planning on combat refueling/resupplying these things, I would suggest you consider possibly refitting the engines with higher power, lower fuel efficiency engines. I think this will give you a significant tactical advantage and will allow you to close the distance to your targets more rapidly, providing fewer opportunities for the enemy to fire on you.
In my experience, the shooting part of combat typically lasts less than a few hours, so I find that long range combat ships are not as useful as short range ships with more powerful engines.
Also, this may be intentional on your part but I will point it out anyway, you have insufficient reactor power to operate all of your weapons simultaneously at maximum firing rate. Reactors aren't that big and it might be worth trading some MSP for more reactors.
Nevermind I didn't notice the 2nd reactor design. However I do believe it would be more spatially efficient to utilize 3x 8 power reactors.
-
You're correct about the powerplants. I did not make a ship specific reactor and opted to use the fleet standard one combined with a fighter plant instead. The engines are already at their limits of usable fuel efficiency, since my fast tankers use the same ones. So far, speed has been a non issue as every ship except tankers possess PD and my enemies are around 2-3 times slower than the beam fleet. I may use more engine boost in the next generation in combination with fast commercial ships, which detach from the fleet upon encountering contacts.
My next foray into experimentation will be a 10kt stealth cruiser. I have 99% cloak tech and 2% thermal signature engines, giving me a cross section of 100t and thermal signature of both 1650t engines at around 60. What sort of sensors and weapons will keep this stealth? Ideally it won't have to use heavy PD and armor with stealth and speed as its main defense.