Aurora 4x
Announcements => Announcements => Topic started by: Steve Walmsley on February 09, 2008, 05:22:27 AM
-
Aurora needs a display resolution of 1280x1024, although you can probably get away with 1280x960.
It should work for all versions of Windows. Some people have reported a few issues with Vista but I think all of them have been resolved after discussions in the forum. I am running it on XP64.
The install requires less than 100Mb of disk space. The database file may grow over time, although there is a compact option on the main menu to reduce the database size if it becomes a problem.
Steve
-
Aurora needs a display resolution of 1280x1024, although you can probably get away with 1280x960.
Steve
Is there anything you can do in future upgrades to reduce the minimum screen resolution?
My laptop can only cope with 1024x768. So I will be unable to play Aurora until I buy a new PC.
Thanks
James
-
The problem is there is so much information to display, its very difficult to squeeze it into 1024x768. I have tried a few different ways to allow players with lower resolution to see all the screens but without much success so far. Is there anyway for you to use software that creates a virtual desktop (or scrolling desktop) larger than your standard resolution?
Here is a example site that has a scrolling desktop, although I found it from a quick google search so I have never used it.
http://www.nearestexit.com/sdesk/ (http://www.nearestexit.com/sdesk/)
Steve
-
Steve,
Any chance of creating the windows with scrollbars?
-
Steve,
Any chance of creating the windows with scrollbars?
That would be good idea.
Cheers
James
-
Any other specific requirements?
I have several computers, some of which are older ---- even have one still running Win98 at at 300 mhz.
Thanks,
Nahuris
-
Any other specific requirements?
I have several computers, some of which are older ---- even have one still running Win98 at at 300 mhz.
It should run on that machine if you have the necessary resolution on the graphics card. It will just run a little slower, which should only be noticeable for very large games anyway. It's the sensor updates that take the time during normal increments and obviously the 5-day increments take much longer than the regular increments. Apart from the speed of increment updates though it will be fine.
Steve
-
Steve,
Any chance of creating the windows with scrollbars?
That would be good idea.
Cheers
James
Hi,
i just joined the forum thanks to a friend of mine that on another forum gave me the link! Coming back to the point, i also have a laptop that has a maximun resolution of 1024x768....
Did you implemented successfully the scrollbars? Does it is possible now to play the game with my laptop resolution?
Thanks!
-
i just joined the forum thanks to a friend of mine that on another forum gave me the link! Coming back to the point, i also have a laptop that has a maximun resolution of 1024x768....
Did you implemented successfully the scrollbars? Does it is possible now to play the game with my laptop resolution?
I did add scrollbars to the Fleet window but there are several other large windows without scrollbars so the minimum resolution is still 1280x1024. I believe some players have successfully managed to play Aurora on a laptop using some kind of floating desktop but unfortunately I don't know the details. You could probably google for how to do that, or if someone is reading this who knows more, please reply to this thread.
Steve
-
i just joined the forum thanks to a friend of mine that on another forum gave me the link! Coming back to the point, i also have a laptop that has a maximun resolution of 1024x768....
Did you implemented successfully the scrollbars? Does it is possible now to play the game with my laptop resolution?
I did add scrollbars to the Fleet window but there are several other large windows without scrollbars so the minimum resolution is still 1280x1024. I believe some players have successfully managed to play Aurora on a laptop using some kind of floating desktop but unfortunately I don't know the details. You could probably google for how to do that, or if someone is reading this who knows more, please reply to this thread.
Steve
I can't help with the floating desktop; however, I play Aurora on a lower res laptop by using a bit of software called ResizeEnable. It allows you to resize the windows including moving buttons etc so that they are visible. It takes a bit of practice to get the right size for each window as sometimes the buttons or scroll bars are moved into odd arrangements, but I find it very workable. All you have to do once the software is installed is drag a window edge and move it. The whole thing is very intuitive.
-
Floating desktop works with XP only, if I remember correctely (don´t have any vista or win7 experience)
Go to the screen where you set your resolution
select enhanced or extended settings (I have a german windows, so I don´t know the exact wording, but it is the lower right most button )
select Monitor
there is a checkbox which reads "Modi ausblenden, die von diesem Monitor nicht angezeigt werden" Something like: don´t show modes this monitor does not support.
Uncheck this box
You can now set resolution to anything your graphics card can handle. If this resolution is higher than what your monitor can display, whenever your mouse pointer reaches the edge of your screen, the whole screen will scroll in that direction.
Hope this helps.
-
hey guys, I found this neat freeware utility for Windows called 360 Desktop (site here- http://360desktop.com (http://360desktop.com)). It is a scrolling desktop utility.
-
Hi Steve,
does Aurora will work on an Mac computer?
I just bought a new Mac and i would like to continue to try to play this addictive game! and so i was interested if it will be working also on Mac! 
ty
-
Hi Steve,
does Aurora will work on an Mac computer?
I just bought a new Mac and i would like to continue to try to play this addictive game! and so i was interested if it will be working also on Mac! 
There is only a PC version so I don't think it would run on a MAC unless you used some type of PC emulator software.
Steve
-
I am getting an error trying to install Aurora on Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit. I get the following error message:
C:\Windows\SETUP.LST
Invalid line in setup information file!
Section: Setup1 Files
@p2sodbc.dll,$(WinSysPath),,$(Shared),11/18/96 10:15:52 PM,131072,4.6.1.106
Installation stops at that point and the temporary installation files are removed. Anyone have any idea what is going on?
-
I am getting an error trying to install Aurora on Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit. I get the following error message:
C:\Windows\SETUP.LST
Invalid line in setup information file!
Section: Setup1 Files
@p2sodbc.dll,$(WinSysPath),,$(Shared),11/18/96 10:15:52 PM,131072,4.6.1.106
Installation stops at that point and the temporary installation files are removed. Anyone have any idea what is going on?
I am not sure what the error message means, but this might be helpful:
Are you logged in as Administrator? If not, can you?
What happens when you try to install to a non-default folder? i.e. not 'C:/program files'.
Do you have all the latest dot net installations? (on my windows 7 machines I had to install the latest dot net and Office to get everything working fine)
-
Yes, I'm fully updated and try to install using the "Run as administrator" option. Could it have something to do with the operating system being 64 bit instead of 32 bit? I was under the impression this only affected the way information is handled by memory, but admittedly I am not knowledgeable in this area. I ordered the free upgrade to Windows 7 which was offered with this computer and it should be arriving in a week or so. It maybe possible that after I install it the problem will clear up since you were successfully in installing it. As a side note I am having the same problem when attempting to install StarFire Assistant.
-
definately not, I have run Aurora on Vista Ultimate and Home Premium both 32 & 64 bit with no issues, and now windows 7 Pro and Home Premium no issues
does the account you are installing as have admin rights (as well as run as administrator they do different things)
Matt
-
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking; user account control is turned completely off on my computer. So are you recommending I turn the account control back on, and through some setting ensure admin rights are set?
-
nope if UAC is off all you really need to ensure is that your account is a local admin. I've never had any errors while running the setup (but I've only ever run an old old setup, then just update patches to later versions, so I don't know if theres a vista issue with later versions of the setup file (assuming you're using the latest)
Matt
-
Hello everyone!
I would like to be a gamer of Aurora, but the resolution problem hits me too!!
I have just tried 360desktop, Sizer and ResizeEnable, but none of them works for me.
I run on Vista 32bit, and max resolution at 1280x800.
Any other suggestion/solution, please?
-
Hello everyone!
I would like to be a gamer of Aurora, but the resolution problem hits me too!!
I have just tried 360desktop, Sizer and ResizeEnable, but none of them works for me.
I run on Vista 32bit, and max resolution at 1280x800.
Any other suggestion/solution, please?
I assume you have checked the Display Issues FAQ but just in case, here is the link: viewtopic.php?f=100&t=2033 (http://aurora.pentarch.org/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=2033)
Steve
-
Thank you!
I have tried the suggestions and the programs listed there, but nothing works!
Any Aurora window is "cut" by Vista at my max resolution, and any program I have tried can't extend it beyond 1280x800!
-
Floating desktop works with XP only, if I remember correctely (don´t have any vista or win7 experience)
Go to the screen where you set your resolution
select enhanced or extended settings (I have a german windows, so I don´t know the exact wording, but it is the lower right most button )
select Monitor
there is a checkbox which reads "Modi ausblenden, die von diesem Monitor nicht angezeigt werden" Something like: don´t show modes this monitor does not support.
Uncheck this box
You can now set resolution to anything your graphics card can handle. If this resolution is higher than what your monitor can display, whenever your mouse pointer reaches the edge of your screen, the whole screen will scroll in that direction.
Hope this helps.
I have a HP Win XP .The box is grayed out. HP told me this is the case with all of their computers. HP said this was done as a safety precaution .
-
Hello all! After lurking a bit and checking out the community I have decided to make my first post! I discovered Aurora over at Wargamer.com in the forums and have been drooling over all the dialogue in the ship design forum and am ready to take the plunge. I have noticed that the game needs a 1024 x 1024 resolution in order to display properly. My laptop is wide-screen and runs at 1366 x 768 res. I know that some of the buttons will not be visible but I must ask; is the game at least playable using hot-keys instead of mouse clicks? I have seen the recommendations for several programs that re-size windows and will try them if I have to much of an issue. I am a huge fan of 4X style space faring games, and this one seems to really scratch my itch. I play GalCiv2 and Sins of a Solar Empire and enjoy them both but neither really does it for me. I love the graphics of Sins, and the real-time game play. But the lack of variety between the ships of the different races is a real buzz kill for me. GalCiv2 is great in the way it lets you design your own ships and decide what engines, weapons, and defenses suit your play style and needs. Unfortunately the graphics are a bit dated, and while there is the ability to customize your fleet, it's just not enough to keep me intrigued.
And then I found Aurora, and my newest addiction! (I say this not even having played it yet, but I can't get it out of my mind
) The level of customization that is available, required even, is incredible. Every time I see this game mentioned, the words deep, complex, engrossing, and addictive are always mentioned. There are a few who prefer a more click-fest approach to 4X gaming, but I am not one of them. So, now that my rant is over, I will provide my specs with the request that anyone who cares to please let me know if I have a chance of getting full functionality out of Aurora.
2x Pentium Dual-Core @ 2.20Ghz each
250 GB Hard Drive
3 GB RAM
1366 x 768 resolution display
Sakai
-
Hello all! After lurking a bit and checking out the community I have decided to make my first post! I discovered Aurora over at Wargamer.com in the forums and have been drooling over all the dialogue in the ship design forum and am ready to take the plunge. I have noticed that the game needs a 1024 x 1024 resolution in order to display properly. My laptop is wide-screen and runs at 1366 x 768 res. I know that some of the buttons will not be visible but I must ask; is the game at least playable using hot-keys instead of mouse clicks? I have seen the recommendations for several programs that re-size windows and will try them if I have to much of an issue. I am a huge fan of 4X style space faring games, and this one seems to really scratch my itch. I play GalCiv2 and Sins of a Solar Empire and enjoy them both but neither really does it for me. I love the graphics of Sins, and the real-time game play. But the lack of variety between the ships of the different races is a real buzz kill for me. GalCiv2 is great in the way it lets you design your own ships and decide what engines, weapons, and defenses suit your play style and needs. Unfortunately the graphics are a bit dated, and while there is the ability to customize your fleet, it's just not enough to keep me intrigued.
And then I found Aurora, and my newest addiction! (I say this not even having played it yet, but I can't get it out of my mind
) The level of customization that is available, required even, is incredible. Every time I see this game mentioned, the words deep, complex, engrossing, and addictive are always mentioned. There are a few who prefer a more click-fest approach to 4X gaming, but I am not one of them. So, now that my rant is over, I will provide my specs with the request that anyone who cares to please let me know if I have a chance of getting full functionality out of Aurora.
2x Pentium Dual-Core @ 2.20Ghz each
250 GB Hard Drive
3 GB RAM
1366 x 768 resolution display
Sakai
Aurora needs a minimum 1280x1024 resolution, although as you mentioned there are a few options for playing it on lower resolution. There is a FAQ for display issues that may be able to help you: viewtopic.php?f=100&t=2033 (http://aurora.pentarch.org/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=2033). Aurora doesn't have any system requirements apart from the resolution so your RAM, hard drive and processor will all be fine.
As regards hotkeys for using off-screen buttons, it is a little hit and miss I'm afraid. I haven't added the Alt-x option to buttons as a matter of course so most buttons don't have them. If your graphics card can handle it, your best bet is probably a cheap monitor that you can connect to the laptop.
Steve
-
Linux user here... I am really curious about this game and it looks like tons of fun but... can I run it through Wine and get away with not having Windows? How well does Aurora get along with the like?
I can get it to install through wine but I run into err:module:import_dll Library MSVBVM60.DLL (which is needed by L"Z:\\home\\sausage\\.wine\\drive_c\\Program Files\\Aurora\\Aurora.exe") not found
err:module:LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for L"Z:\\home\\sausage\\.wine\\drive_c\\Program Files\\Aurora\\Aurora.exe" failed, status c0000135
I'm currently looking into it, i'll edit with updates if applicable.
EDIT: ooo its the streak of error 91's, you have to love it when programs look for files in the wrong spot. god I hate linux sometimes.
REDIT: ok... it works when right clicking Aurora.exe and opening with Wine Application Loader, but if you use the terminal it doesn't work...
REREDIT: This might be just because i'm using 4.91 not 5.14, but I get a type mismatch every time I increment the time (Error in ShowMinerals) The game doesn't crash but it probably doesn't like it (I don't really know the extent of the error as I just started playing like 2 days ago, havent even gotten through the tutorials yet.)
REREREDIT: I opened every other page, and the only error I got was from opening the technology report, it was also a type mismatch. Every page showed up fine, text was fine, pretty much everything in the game is perfect on my linux except for the type mismatch error. I'll patch it to 5.14 tomorrow and see how it fares.
-
Linux user here... I am really curious about this game and it looks like tons of fun but... can I run it through Wine and get away with not having Windows? How well does Aurora get along with the like?
I can get it to install through wine but I run into err:module:import_dll Library MSVBVM60.DLL (which is needed by L"Z:\\home\\sausage\\.wine\\drive_c\\Program Files\\Aurora\\Aurora.exe") not found
err:module:LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for L"Z:\\home\\sausage\\.wine\\drive_c\\Program Files\\Aurora\\Aurora.exe" failed, status c0000135
I'm currently looking into it, i'll edit with updates if applicable.
EDIT: ooo its the streak of error 91's, you have to love it when programs look for files in the wrong spot. god I hate linux sometimes.
REDIT: ok... it works when right clicking Aurora.exe and opening with Wine Application Loader, but if you use the terminal it doesn't work...
REREDIT: This might be just because i'm using 4.91 not 5.14, but I get a type mismatch every time I increment the time (Error in ShowMinerals) The game doesn't crash but it probably doesn't like it (I don't really know the extent of the error as I just started playing like 2 days ago, havent even gotten through the tutorials yet.)
REREREDIT: I opened every other page, and the only error I got was from opening the technology report, it was also a type mismatch. Every page showed up fine, text was fine, pretty much everything in the game is perfect on my linux except for the type mismatch error. I'll patch it to 5.14 tomorrow and see how it fares.
Unfortunately I don't know anything about Linux so I can't help very much. The type mismatches are odd though. I haven't had them reported from any windows user so I assume they must be Linux-specific. However, the error is likely caused by a function not receiving the data type it expected so I don't understand why the operating system would affect that. This may be a very dumb question but can linux affect the data types within an executable file?
Steve
-
This may be a very dumb question but can linux affect the data types within an executable file?
hmmm. not a dumb question at all. It's not linux that would do it but wine itself. I do not believe that it edits the file at all, unless it's trying to draw information from my video card which I don't think it is while accessing ShowMinerals.
I'm downloading 5.14 now, i'll edit with results.
EDIT: no change, still error 13 type mismatch in ShowMinerals. Can I ask where it is showing the minerals on the system map so I can see if they are displayed?
-
This may be a very dumb question but can linux affect the data types within an executable file?
hmmm. not a dumb question at all. It's not linux that would do it but wine itself. I do not believe that it edits the file at all, unless it's trying to draw information from my video card which I don't think it is while accessing ShowMinerals.
I'm downloading 5.14 now, i'll edit with results.
EDIT: no change, still error 13 type mismatch in ShowMinerals. Can I ask where it is showing the minerals on the system map so I can see if they are displayed?
There are two functions in Aurora called ShowMinerals. One on the System View (F9) window that shows the minerals for a specific system body. The other is for the system map (F3) and shows the system minerals in a treeview control on the sidebar.
Steve
-
There are two functions in Aurora called ShowMinerals. One on the System View (F9) window that shows the minerals for a specific system body. The other is for the system map (F3) and shows the system minerals in a treeview control on the sidebar.
System view won't open: Error 713 MSSTDFMT.DLL not installed. I can fix that in a little bit
the minerals in the sidebar show up just fine.
EDIT: bah. putting MSSTDFMT.DLL in the system folder didnt change anything
-
There are two functions in Aurora called ShowMinerals. One on the System View (F9) window that shows the minerals for a specific system body. The other is for the system map (F3) and shows the system minerals in a treeview control on the sidebar.
System view won't open: Error 713 MSSTDFMT.DLL not installed. I can fix that in a little bit
the minerals in the sidebar show up just fine.
EDIT: bah. putting MSSTDFMT.DLL in the system folder didnt change anything
This thread covers the missing DLL viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1715 (http://aurora.pentarch.org/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1715) if you are using Win7. Steve's installer/compiler doesn't seem to include it when he creates a new exe.
-
This thread covers the missing DLL viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1715 if you are using Win7. Steve's installer/compiler doesn't seem to include it when he creates a new exe.
Yes, but that's for Win7, we are talking about linux here.
-
I run Aurora through wine and yes, just grab a copy of the .DLL file and stick it in your .wine\drive_c\Program Files\Aurora directory.
And yes, Aurora runs perfectly under wine except for the Type 13 mismatch error in Show_Minerals. Which means the the (F9) 'System Information' window is non-functional, and the game is essentially unplayable. If I knew more about wine or VB6 I'd write up a proper bug report.
Incidentally, the (F9) 'System Information' window works fine if you have no mineral surveys done (as Show_Minerals is not called) - which is only the case when setting up a new game.
P.S.: Running Aurora under wine is covered (at least somewhat) in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1965 (http://aurora.pentarch.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1965)
-
I run Aurora through wine and yes, just grab a copy of the .DLL file and stick it in your .wine\drive_c\Program Files\Aurora directory.
And yes, Aurora runs perfectly under wine except for the Type 13 mismatch error in Show_Minerals. Which means the the (F9) 'System Information' window is non-functional, and the game is essentially unplayable. If I knew more about wine or VB6 I'd write up a proper bug report.
Incidentally, the (F9) 'System Information' window works fine if you have no mineral surveys done (as Show_Minerals is not called) - which is only the case when setting up a new game.
P.S.: Running Aurora under wine is covered (at least somewhat) in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1965 (http://aurora.pentarch.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1965)
I have looked at this in more detail and the only time the ShowMinerals function runs on the F9 window is if you try to manually change the mineral amounts for a particular planet. Can I just confirm again that this bug appears on the F9 System View window and not the F3 System Map window? In any event, I have added a menu option to the main menu for your to disable the ShowMinerals function so the bug can't happen. This means you won't be able to see the mineral amounts for a particular planet in the specify minerals section when you choose the Specify Minerals option but you will still be able to set new amounts (using some other mineral view for the same planet as your guide)
Steve
-
I thoroughly tested every window in v4.91, and encountered the Type 13 mismatch in Show_Minerals in the (F9) 'System Information' window in existing games, and after clicking the 'All SB surveyed' button in a new game. Also in the 'Geological Survey Results' window (whether by the 'Geo Status' button on the (F2) Population & Production screen, or the button on the F3 'System Map' window).
Opening the (F3) 'System Map' throws an "Error in Show Minerals: Run-time Error '13' - Type mismatch" if the option to show mineral survey results is checked.
Strangely, the (Ctrl-F7) 'Technology Report' window generates "Error in PopulateActive: Run-time Error '13' - Type Mismatch" as well.
-
I thoroughly tested every window in v4.91, and encountered the Type 13 mismatch in Show_Minerals in the (F9) 'System Information' window in existing games, and after clicking the 'All SB surveyed' button in a new game. Also in the 'Geological Survey Results' window (whether by the 'Geo Status' button on the (F2) Population & Production screen, or the button on the F3 'System Map' window).
Opening the (F3) 'System Map' throws an "Error in Show Minerals: Run-time Error '13' - Type mismatch" if the option to show mineral survey results is checked.
Strangely, the (Ctrl-F7) 'Technology Report' window generates "Error in PopulateActive: Run-time Error '13' - Type Mismatch" as well.
I have been through the functions involved and I can't find anything that is both common across those functions and doesn't occur anywhere else. I have been doing some searches on the net and it seems that Wine does have problems with type mismatch errors in VB6 programs that run perfectly well in Windows. I haven't been able to pin down the cause of the problem yet though.
Steve
-
Hi, my desktop is 1680x1050 but the windows are still not displaying all the way. I can see the bottoms of the windows just fine (though sometimes I have to move the taskbar to the side of the screen), but the windows just stop after a certain point. For example, here is the bottom left of the Class Design window, which the tutorial says should have some buttons:
(http://i45.tinypic.com/14w7fdk.png)
In other windows, the bottom widgets look clipped on the bottom kind of like the Material Required text area in the picture. It can't be enlarged by dragging it, either.
-
Hi, my desktop is 1680x1050 but the windows are still not displaying all the way. I can see the bottoms of the windows just fine (though sometimes I have to move the taskbar to the side of the screen), but the windows just stop after a certain point. For example, here is the bottom left of the Class Design window, which the tutorial says should have some buttons:
Are you using large fonts?
Steve
-
Looking at the settings, it looks like it is using Trebuchet MS size 10 for the title bars and Tahoma size 8 for everything else. Is that too big for Aurora? Alternatively, is there a way to change the fonts used by Aurora without changing the fonts used by default for all applications?
-
Looking at the settings, it looks like it is using Trebuchet MS size 10 for the title bars and Tahoma size 8 for everything else. Is that too big for Aurora? Alternatively, is there a way to change the fonts used by Aurora without changing the fonts used by default for all applications?
Large fonts in windows means the actual text takes up more room. It doesn't change the font size. Not sure which version of windows you are using but it will be somewhere in your display settings. 96 dpi is the normal setting. There must be something out of the ordinary as 1600x1050 should be fine.
Steve
-
Well, I reduced the window title font down to size 8, and everything else to size 7, and although it looks less clipped there are still no buttons at the bottom of that window. I notice there is a setting for "large fonts" in the general part of that settings display, but it is not enabled. I am running Windows XP (although I think I am still on SP 2 rather than SP 3, if that matters) and I have not changed the default OS fonts, except once (after which I reset it to default). Also, it seems that nothing I do in that display window actually changes the size of the fonts in Aurora that are not in the title bar - all of the text in the main window is still the same size. If there's some other esoteric MS thing I have to do to change it, I don't know what it might be.
-
If you are running xp then you have an option to enable resolutions that the monitor does not support.
Right click on the background wallpaper. Select Properties. Select Advanced, Select Monitor. There should be a check box saying enable resolutions not supported... Click on this and then enable. Go back to the properties and where the resolution is you should see a bunch more options now. click on the one for 1280x1024 and then apply.
What will happen is that the screen is now scrollable with moving the mouse to the edge of your screen moving what is displayed so you can see things that would not normally be available on your size monitor.
Brian
-
Brian, my screen size is already bigger than 1280x1024, and the problem is not that the window doesn't fit on the monitor but that the window itself is not actually displaying all of its widgets, possibly because whatever font it is using is too big. I suppose I can go look for the option to make it even bigger when I'm on it again, but I don't think that will help.
-
Is it drawing the window at the bottom of the screen? so that the missing part would scroll of the edge of the screen if it was drawn in? and does it take up the whole screen (does it look like it wouldnt fit on the screen if it added the bottom of the window)?
If the first answer is yes and the second is no, have you tried the reset window locations in Aurora? and then restart Aurora?
Matt
-
Ok, so the controls that Brian was talking about are not there - they might be a service pack 3 thing.
I reset the window positions, and now I see that, including the title bar, the window as generated is exactly as high as the screen, though I can move the title bar up past the top of the screen to see the place where the rest of the window should be, which is what I've been doing anyway. Are you sure there's no way to change the font that the game uses?
-
on a 1080 high screen the windows definately should not be the full height of the screen, in the section where you can set large fonts, theres also a selection for custom font sizes, which allows you to go smaller, down to about 75% of normal I think, It requires a reboot, and I've never done this myself, so I cant guarantee it wont cause other issues.
Matt
-
Well, the section I found does not require a reboot, and it changes the font sizes of all the fonts in most applications (down to size 6), but not in Aurora. Probably the game is overriding the system fonts with its own font, which is why I think there should be another way to change it somehow.