Author Topic: missile questions + others  (Read 4299 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hawkeye

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1059
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • 2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Supporter of the forum in 2023
    2024 Supporter 2024 Supporter : Supporter of the forum for 2024
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter :
Ralph Hoenig, Germany
 

Offline metalax (OP)

  • Commander
  • *********
  • m
  • Posts: 356
  • Thanked: 4 times
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #16 on: January 20, 2010, 06:40:15 AM »
So if I've got this right you need to have replacement battalions present for any repairs to be made to a unit, yes? And it consumes the replacement battalion (or part of) in the process? I also assume when it talks of location it means anywhere on the same colony not just in the same PDC?
 

Offline Father Tim

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2162
  • Thanked: 532 times
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #17 on: January 20, 2010, 06:24:17 PM »
Not quite.  'Damaged' ground units will be slowly brought back up to full strength over time.  Slo-o-o-owly.  As in about the same time it takes to build one from scratch (though it doesn't require GFTF to do so - ground units will acutally 'repair' themselves even on an airless rock deep in enemy territory and completely cut-off from resupply.  (A minor bug that Steve may fix one day, but is such a rare occurence that it isn't really worth the programming time to address.))

Replacement Battalions (a la WWII U.S. Army) rapidly speed things up, such that units actively fighting a ground war will stay in pretty good shape.  Somewhere around 50 times faster than recovering on their own.

Of course, unless you're fighting on your homeworld, it may be better to spend trooplift on bringing in more combat battalions than on replacements for the existing ground troops.  Just another one of Aurora's ten thousand little choices and efficiency calculations.
 

Offline sloanjh

  • Global Moderator
  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • *****
  • Posts: 2805
  • Thanked: 113 times
  • 2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Supporter of the forum in 2023
    2024 Supporter 2024 Supporter : Supporter of the forum for 2024
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter :
    2020 Supporter 2020 Supporter :
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #18 on: January 20, 2010, 07:40:42 PM »
Quote from: "Father Tim"
ground units will acutally 'repair' themselves even on an airless rock deep in enemy territory and completely cut-off from resupply.  

Hey!!  Those 10-man, stealthed, long ranged, jump-capable infiltration fighters are REALLY good at what they do!!  So good that you can't even see them from SM view :-)  And there are so many of them too!

John
 

Offline Rathos

  • Warrant Officer, Class 1
  • *****
  • R
  • Posts: 92
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2010, 01:08:05 PM »
Quote from: "sloanjh"
Quote from: "Father Tim"
ground units will acutally 'repair' themselves even on an airless rock deep in enemy territory and completely cut-off from resupply.  

Hey!!  Those 10-man, stealthed, long ranged, jump-capable infiltration fighters are REALLY good at what they do!!  So good that you can't even see them from SM view :mrgreen:
 

Offline waresky

  • Registered
  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1487
  • Thanked: 9 times
  • Alpine Mountaineer..ohh Yeah!
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #20 on: January 21, 2010, 01:18:08 PM »
Quote from: "Rathos"
Quote from: "sloanjh"
Quote from: "Father Tim"
ground units will acutally 'repair' themselves even on an airless rock deep in enemy territory and completely cut-off from resupply.  

Hey!!  Those 10-man, stealthed, long ranged, jump-capable infiltration fighters are REALLY good at what they do!!  So good that you can't even see them from SM view :mrgreen:


Rathos..
ive been missed something: Combat Drop for ur Company middle the battle..or Cargo handling for speed up load unload in COLONY landscape.
 

Offline Rathos

  • Warrant Officer, Class 1
  • *****
  • R
  • Posts: 92
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #21 on: January 21, 2010, 01:20:42 PM »
Haha, it was a joke =P

Code: [Select]
Ark Royal class Stealth Troop Transport    1800 tons     116 Crew     1708.5 BP      TCS 0.18  TH 3.75  EM 0
10416 km/s    JR 3-50     Armour 1-13     Shields 0-0     Sensors 75/1/0/0     Damage Control Rating 3     PPV 0
Annual Failure Rate: 8%    IFR: 0.1%    Maintenance Capacity 1780 MSP    Max Repair 1305 MSP
Troop Capacity: 1 Company    Drop Capacity: 1 Company    Cargo Handling Multiplier 40    

J2500(3-50) Military Jump Drive     Max Ship Size 2500 tons    Distance 50k km     Squadron Size 3
Photonic Drive E0.5 ARM-10 (1)    Power 375    Fuel Use 5%    Signature 3.75    Armour 10    Exp 1%    Hyper Capable
Fuel Capacity 50,000 Litres    Range 999.9 billion km   (1111 days at full power)

Thermal Sensor TH1-75 (1)     Sensitivity 75     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  75m km
Cloaking Device: Class cross-section reduced to 0.5% of normal

ECM 50

This design is classed as a military vessel for maintenance purposes

All better now =)
 

Offline waresky

  • Registered
  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1487
  • Thanked: 9 times
  • Alpine Mountaineer..ohh Yeah!
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #22 on: January 21, 2010, 02:31:55 PM »
eheh u,rathos and Atomik are becoming Aurora's Addict:)) same as me and many others.
ur welcome.
 

Offline metalax (OP)

  • Commander
  • *********
  • m
  • Posts: 356
  • Thanked: 4 times
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #23 on: January 21, 2010, 03:07:10 PM »
Some more questions.

From what I've gathered reading the forum, engineers benefit from the Xenology bonus when working on recovering installations. Do they gain bonuses from being attached to HQ units who also have Xenology bonuses in a similar way to benefits from ground combat bonuses?

How do you change the racial training level?

Is it possible for a geosurvey team to find that there are no deposits on a body? So far every body that I've put a team on has found at least one deposit, even if it is very small(1000 Duranium being the smallest find so far).
 

Offline metalax (OP)

  • Commander
  • *********
  • m
  • Posts: 356
  • Thanked: 4 times
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #24 on: January 23, 2010, 08:30:07 PM »
Where can you see the armour on a turret after it has been designed?

Do you need more than one ECM on a ship? I know you need one ECCM per firecontrol.
 

Offline Kurt

  • Gold Supporter
  • Vice Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1894
  • Thanked: 3893 times
  • 2024 Supporter 2024 Supporter : Supporter of the forum for 2024
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Supporter of the forum in 2023
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter :
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #25 on: January 24, 2010, 12:40:49 AM »
Quote from: "metalax"
Where can you see the armour on a turret after it has been designed?

Do you need more than one ECM on a ship? I know you need one ECCM per firecontrol.

As far as I know you can't see the turret armor anywhere.  I don't think turret armor has been updated since Steve introduced the new armor system, so that may explain it.

You only need one ECM, although I suppose you could mount more for redundancy  purposes.

Kurt
 

Offline Brian Neumann

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1214
  • Thanked: 3 times
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #26 on: January 24, 2010, 05:09:29 AM »
Personally I tend to mount one compact ecm on smaller ships (under 150hs).  A full size ecm on anything larger, and by the time that the ship is 250hs or more it probably has a backup of a compact system as well.

Brian
 

Offline VariousArtist

  • Chief Petty Officer
  • ***
  • V
  • Posts: 39
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #27 on: February 03, 2010, 11:31:48 AM »
The info about the AMM had been very helpful.
Whats about offensive missiles? A few size6-designs have been mentioned and a active sensor suit. So far Ive never used active sensors on missles, so what do you use as good early and mid-game design? And whats about electronic warfare capability?

thx
 

Offline Brian Neumann

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1214
  • Thanked: 3 times
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #28 on: February 03, 2010, 03:10:44 PM »
Quote from: "VariousArtist"
The info about the AMM had been very helpful.
Whats about offensive missiles? A few size6-designs have been mentioned and a active sensor suit. So far Ive never used active sensors on missles, so what do you use as good early and mid-game design? And whats about electronic warfare capability?

thx
The active sensors, or passive sensors on a missile allow the missile to home in on a target if they can be detected by the missile's own sensor capability.  This most often happens if the original target was destroyed, when the follow on waves reach the spot where it was destroyed they will be looking for an alternate target.  If they see some they will randomly pick one as a target and attack it.  Having a small sensor package on larger missiles is a good way to avoid loosing a bunch of expensive missiles due to overkilling the target.

Missile ECM will make hitting the missiles much harder.  the net difference between (ECM-ECCM)x10 is the percent reduction in the beam weapons to hit chance, and the missile weapons fire control range.  

Armour works as the chance that a hit actually destroying the missile is the damage the weapon does to the missile/(sum of missile armour and the damage).  This means that a one point warhead on a pd missile will have a 50% chance to kill a missile it hits that has 1 point of armour.  As missile interception chances at lower tech level's are around 25%, this can make a big difference in how many counter missiles are required to stop an incomming salvo.  It also works the same way against beam weapons/gauss cannon.  One point of armour will make light railguns and gauss cannon much less effective as pd weapons.  heavier railguns and lasers will still work reasonably well (a 10cm laser does 3 points of damage so has a 75% chance to kill what it hits against 1 point of armour).

For small missiles it is a difficult question as to whether any sensors/defences are practical.  For larger missiles having some space set aside can be very effective.  It all depends on your design strategy.  The only thing that better tech does not help is the effectivness of armour.  This is just a constant based on how many MSP you put into it.

Brian
 

Offline Father Tim

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2162
  • Thanked: 532 times
Re: missile questions + others
« Reply #29 on: February 03, 2010, 04:32:39 PM »
I believe that any missile with a warhead of at least 1 point* will destroy any missile it hits, regardless of armour.  Also, technology does improve missile armour, in that the various levels of armour tech reduce the amount of MSP needed to install 1 point of armour on a missile.


*It used to be that any missile would destroy any missile, which led to people building 0-point warhead antimissiles, which various members of this board disagreed with.  Personally I'm fine with it, but I'm in the minority and Steve upped the requirement to 'at least 1 point of warhead strength'.