Author Topic: Defence Bases and Other Defence Units  (Read 1757 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Xanithas (OP)

  • Chief Petty Officer
  • ***
  • X
  • Posts: 44
  • Thanked: 15 times
Defence Bases and Other Defence Units
« on: April 25, 2023, 10:06:30 PM »
Hello all,

I am advancing in my game a fair bit and have secured a good bit of territory while at war with one NPR and being attacked intermittently by the Star Swarm. I have found that static jump point defenses are starting to become necessary to cover approached into key systems I don't have full control over yet and don't want to leave a large number of warships in but wanted to know if I am on the right track.


Starting with the defense bases, I opted for two twin 25cm Laser turrets mounted with a sensor to allow it to operate even if the sensor bouys deployed at all of my jump points are disabled. I opted for the 5k size as it allows me to use my Prelate class carrier, which I already was using to cover logistics convoys, to bring the defense stations where I want to put them and carry them away for repair and maintenance (as I haven't found a better way to overhaul them, they get towed to the nearest planet with maintenance capabilities for overhaul every 10 years). My current deployment tactic is to group them in sets of 4 at all the cardinal directions surrounding the jump point at about 250km to allow for a slight overlap in fields of fire but cover the max amount of space surrounding the jump point. This can mean that ships can move into areas outside the range of at least half sometimes 3 of the stations but I fear putting them close together makes them vulnerable to fire. I am finding to counter the majority of inbound traffic they do fine, but significant numbers of small craft / single extremely large ships (25+k tonnes) push them over.

Code: [Select]
Gatekeeper class Orbital Defence Base      5,000 tons       152 Crew       2,093.4 BP       TCS 100    TH 0    EM 0
1 km/s      Armour 10-26       Shields 0-0       HTK 52      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 4      PPV 37.44
Maint Life 11.35 Years     MSP 8,761    AFR 50%    IFR 0.7%    1YR 125    5YR 1,872    Max Repair 537.56 MSP
Lieutenant Commander    Control Rating 2   BRG   AUX   
Intended Deployment Time: 120 months    Morale Check Required   

Twin Kratos Defence 25.0cm FXR Naval Grade Laser Turret (2x2)    Range 384,000km     TS: 10000 km/s     Power 32-16     RM 80,000 km    ROF 10       
Kratos Defence "Nova" Fixed Naval Laser BFC MKIII (1)     Max Range: 384,000 km   TS: 10,000 km/s     97 95 92 90 87 84 82 79 77 74
General Electric ICFR P10 (3)     Total Power Output 30    Exp 5%
General Electric ICFR P3 (1)     Total Power Output 3    Exp 5%

Lockheed-Martin "Thunderhead" SASS (1)     GPS 1800     Range 69.2m km    Resolution 10

This design is classed as a Military Vessel for maintenance purposes
This design is classed as a Warship for auto-assignment purposes

Code: [Select]
Prelate class Auxiliary Carrier      50,000 tons       481 Crew       3,212.6 BP       TCS 1,000    TH 5,000    EM 0
5000 km/s      Armour 1-120       Shields 0-0       HTK 86      Sensors 1/1/0/0      DCR 1      PPV 0
MSP 30,040    Max Repair 625 MSP
Hangar Deck Capacity 10,000 tons     Magazine 1,000    Cargo Shuttle Multiplier 15   
Lieutenant Commander    Control Rating 2   BRG   AUX   
Intended Deployment Time: 3 months    Flight Crew Berths 200   

Atlas Engines Limited 50kt CIFD HS200 P.5 EP2500.00 (2)    Power 5000    Fuel Use 1.19%    Signature 2500    Explosion 5%
Fuel Capacity 2,469,000 Litres    Range 749.5 billion km (1735 days at full power)
Refuelling Capability: 125,000 litres per hour     Complete Refuel 19 hours

FURUNO Civilian Grade Navigational Sensor MK II (1)     GPS 360     Range 30.9m km    Resolution 10
FURUNO Civilian Grade Thermal Sensor MK II (1)     Sensitivity 1.8     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  10.6m km
FURUNO Civilian Grade EMl Sensor MK II (1)     Sensitivity 1.8     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  10.6m km

This design is classed as a Commercial Vessel for maintenance purposes
This design is classed as a Carrier for auto-assignment purposes


Now the primary reason I posted here, I have recently encountered the star swarm and when their formations jump through a protected jump point they are able to overwhelm my defense stations with their numbers while suffering comparatively light losses and also with their massive speed run outside my max range with ease. To counter this I designed a deep space fighter base which I am unsure if I took the correct tack on. I choose to make the base a actual space station to allow for more swift construction and deployment, and I didn't see any value in making in in a civilian shipyard / military shipyard however if I missed something critical I am still able to change the design to be an actual "ship." The fighters onboard are designed to cover two range brackets, the Hornet, for extremely close to the jump point under the guns of the defense bases and primarily designed to exploit damage caused by the defense bastions and dragoons particle beams to score lots of critical hits on damaged ships of just hammer their target down through shear volume of fire. The Dragoon on the other hand is designed to follow beyond the range of the defense stations and attack from what I assess to be beyond the range of the enemy craft to return fire.
Code: [Select]
Bulwark class Fighter Base      60,634 tons       572 Crew       2,747.9 BP       TCS 1,213    TH 0    EM 0
1 km/s      No Armour       Shields 0-0     HTK 77      Sensors 14/14/0/0      DCR 1      PPV 0
MSP 10,028    Max Repair 120 MSP
Hangar Deck Capacity 16,000 tons     
Lieutenant Commander    Control Rating 2   BRG   PFC   
Intended Deployment Time: 3 months    Flight Crew Berths 320   
Repair Capacity: 1000 tons
Maintenance Modules: 5 module(s) capable of supporting ships of 16,000 tons

Fuel Capacity 5,000,000 Litres    Range N/A

FURUNO Station Grade Thermal Proximity Sensor (1)     Sensitivity 14     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  29.6m km
FURUNO Station Grade EM Proximity Sensor (1)     Sensitivity 14     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  29.6m km

Strike Group
6x Dragoon Fast Attack Craft   Speed: 20000 km/s    Size: 20
40x Hornet MK I Fighter   Speed: 28044 km/s    Size: 5

This design is classed as a Commercial Vessel for maintenance purposes
This design is classed as a Space Station for construction purposes
This design is classed as a Carrier for auto-assignment purposes

Code: [Select]
Hornet MK I class Fighter      250 tons       2 Crew       131.3 BP       TCS 5    TH 140    EM 0
28044 km/s      Armour 1-3       Shields 0-0       HTK 1      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 0      PPV 1.65
Maint Life 2.97 Years     MSP 55    AFR 50%    IFR 0.7%    1YR 9    5YR 139    Max Repair 70.06 MSP
Lieutenant    Control Rating 1   
Intended Deployment Time: 0.9 days    Morale Check Required   

Panavia Spacecraft FIFD HS1.9 P2.95  EP140.12 (1)    Power 140.1    Fuel Use 1028.73%    Signature 140.12    Explosion 29%
Fuel Capacity 10,000 Litres    Range 0.7 billion km (6 hours at full power)

Rheinmetall Arms RA-1 Stinger 10cm Cannon (1x2)    Range 40,000km     TS: 28,044 km/s     Power 1.5-1.5     RM 40,000 km    ROF 5       
Rheinmetall Arms  RA-1 Stinger 10cm Cannon SBFC (1)     Max Range: 57,600 km   TS: 28,000 km/s     83 65 48 31 13 0 0 0 0 0
General Electric SCAM P1.5 (1)     Total Power Output 1.5    Exp 5%

Thyssenkrupp AG Extra Small Missile Detection Sensor (1)     GPS 4     Range 4.5m km    MCR 408.7k km    Resolution 1

This design is classed as a Fighter for production, combat and planetary interaction
This design is classed as a Fighter for auto-assignment purposes

Code: [Select]
Dragoon class Fast Attack Craft      1,000 tons       26 Crew       532.1 BP       TCS 20    TH 400    EM 0
20000 km/s      Armour 2-8       Shields 0-0       HTK 8      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 0      PPV 8
Maint Life 1.62 Years     MSP 96    AFR 40%    IFR 0.6%    1YR 43    5YR 642    Max Repair 200.00 MSP
Lieutenant    Control Rating 1   
Intended Deployment Time: 15 days    Morale Check Required   

Isotta Fraschini FAC Class SIFD HS6.4 P2.5 EP400.00 (1)    Power 400.0    Fuel Use 370.58%    Signature 400.00    Explosion 25%
Fuel Capacity 73,000 Litres    Range 3.55 billion km (49 hours at full power)

CERN Naval Grade Particle Beam MK II (6) (1)    Range 240,000km     TS: 20,000 km/s     Power 15-8    ROF 10       
CERN "Chevalier" Fixed Naval Partical Beam SBFC  (1)     Max Range: 240,000 km   TS: 20,000 km/s     96 92 88 83 79 75 71 67 62 58
General Electric SCAM P8 (1)     Total Power Output 8.2    Exp 5%

Thyssenkrupp AG Extra Small Missile Detection Sensor (1)     GPS 4     Range 4.5m km    MCR 408.7k km    Resolution 1

This design is classed as a Military Vessel for maintenance purposes
This design is classed as a FAC for auto-assignment purposes

I would greatly appreciate any feedback you may have, this is my first time making static defense stations and while these seem good in theory I might be completely off the mark.
« Last Edit: April 25, 2023, 10:44:05 PM by Xanithas »
 
The following users thanked this post: Warer

Offline nuclearslurpee

  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2960
  • Thanked: 2222 times
  • Radioactive frozen beverage.
Re: Defence Bases and Other Defence Units
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2023, 10:26:45 PM »
Your approach looks generally reasonable. Personally I don't like using static defense stations as they have numerous weaknesses, but if you must use them this seems like a reasonable approach. As you see, each kind of station has different strengths and weaknesses, beam defenses for example can be evaded or swarmed, while missile bases are vulnerable at close range before they can get off enough salvos.

A couple of points:

- I would consider changing your JP defense arrangement to clusters of stations set at 60 degree rather than 90 degree angles from each other around the jump point. Even with fewer stations per cluster this will eliminate most of the holes in your fire envelope and mean fewer ships in a JP assault can evade your fire immediately.

- For the particular problem you discuss, you might consider missile-armed bases with low-resolution fire controls. Missile bases can do very well against the sort of small craft you are concerned about as you can get off many small salvos while the enemy crosses the several million km distance and pick off most of the enemy in this way. Missiles in general are quite suited for JP defense as small groups from squadron jumps will have limited PD fire while you are not limited in ability to concentrate fire, as long as your missiles arrive before the enemy formation coalesces.

- Fighter bases are probably the least effective type of defense station in a tactical sense, since there is some redundancy in tonnage by having the base and the fighters in it. The main advantage is flexibility as you can in principle easily change the loadout of a fighter base by changing its fighters. I would probably prefer to look into other options, including deploying actual warships, if I have a specific problem to solve, whereas for general purposes without a specific threat in mind a fighter base is a much stronger option as you can quickly adapt to any threat which arises.
 
The following users thanked this post: Xanithas

Offline boolybooly

  • Lieutenant
  • *******
  • Posts: 171
  • Thanked: 87 times
Re: Defence Bases and Other Defence Units
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2023, 08:35:53 AM »
I guess any way which works is a good way, especially against the swarm. Each to their own. I am replying out of sympathy because my current game involves a similar situation.

These are all interesting ideas. I like the Hornets, will have to think about that. I went missile research because I set Raiders to 0 systems so had to defend from the earliest era of the game and could not at first do so effectively using direct fire weapons alone. For more info please see my reports in the Spoilers subforum.

I am predominantly using missiles, high endurance / mid speed box launcher fighters and platforms to defend strategic JPs. Shhh the walls have ears... and possibly mandibles where these guys are concerned!

After some historic battles, including a salutory defeat and very close victory against an overwhelming force, a faster fighter-bomber box launcher design was developed to seek and destroy, accompanied by recon fighters, in a strategy of preemptive attrition.

The issue with box launched missiles is reload time. Its a one shot deal and in defence, if you dont take them all down, you lose. In attack if you are not fast enough to get away, you lose, which limits search range. The missiles are also resource hogs.

Their value though is the massive alpha strike they can potentially deliver at significantly greater range than beam weapons which makes JP coverage possible from a single location.

The rules are changing in 2.2 but for 2.1.1 I tried this mid range design as my first S&D fighter.

Code: [Select]
Mesh class Fighter-bomber      500 tons       12 Crew       118.7 BP       TCS 10    TH 129    EM 0
12936 km/s      Armour 1-5       Shields 0-0       HTK 2      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 0      PPV 2.6
Maint Life 8.37 Years     MSP 134    AFR 20%    IFR 0.3%    1YR 3    5YR 51    Max Repair 64.6 MSP
Magazine 17   
Seeker    Control Rating 1   BRG   
Intended Deployment Time: 37 months    Morale Check Required   

Nova MCF5 P129.2 (1)    Power 129.2    Fuel Use 305.63%    Signature 129.2    Explosion 17%
Fuel Capacity 39,000 Litres    Range 4.6 billion km (4 days at full power)

Hard Point (10)     Missile Size: 1.7    Hangar Reload 65 minutes    MF Reload 10 hours
Honeyguide (1)     Range 5.4m km    Resolution 1
Tyrant's Teacher Quick (10)    Speed: 57,177 km/s    End: 0.3m     Range: 1.1m km    WH: 7    Size: 1.7    TH: 419/251/125

Hive (1)     GPS 30     Range 6.5m km    Resolution 14

Payload "Tyrant's Teacher Quick" was specially designed to break through critical defensive formations by overwhelming tracking with ordnance speed and reduce formation effectiveness by targeting and rendering incompetent key elements of the formation one by one, in accordance with the strategy of attrition.

And this is a fighter class mobile orbital defence platform in which engines are sacrificed for alpha strike.

Code: [Select]
Cloud Flower class Orbital Defence Platform      500 tons       2 Crew       72.2 BP       TCS 10    TH 1    EM 0
120 km/s      Armour 4-5       Shields 0-0       HTK 1      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 0      PPV 6.5
Maint Life 26.48 Years     MSP 99    AFR 20%    IFR 0.3%    1YR 0    5YR 4    Max Repair 5 MSP
Magazine 42.5   
Seeker    Control Rating 1   
Intended Deployment Time: 421 months    Morale Check Required   

Thruster 1.2 (1)    Power 1.2    Fuel Use 13.94%    Signature 1.2    Explosion 3%
Fuel Capacity 12,000 Litres    Range 31 billion km (2988 days at full power)

Hard Point (25)     Missile Size: 1.7    Hangar Reload 65 minutes    MF Reload 10 hours
Honeyguide (5)     Range 5.4m km    Resolution 1
Tyrant's Judge III LR (25)    Speed: 44,057 km/s    End: 0.8m     Range: 2.1m km    WH: 8    Size: 1.607    TH: 337/202/101

Karna (1)     GPS 3     Range 2.7m km    MCR 244k km    Resolution 1


Though for convenience, after a hostile slipped through the sensor net before defenders could fire, key JPs were mined with heavy missile buoys which are yet to be tested in battle.

Bungelo Mine sensors base. (Named after the Pied Piper folktale. A street in Hamelin named Bungelosenstrasse ("street without drums") is believed to be the last place that the children were seen. Ever since, music or dancing is not allowed on this street.)
Code: [Select]
Missile Size: 3.425 MSP  (8.5625 Tons)     Warhead: 0    Radiation Damage: 0    Manoeuvre Rating: 10
Speed: 0 km/s     Fuel: 175     1st Stage Flight Time: 1 seconds    1st Stage Range: 0k km
2nd Stage Flight Time: 41 seconds    2nd Stage Range: 1,734.2k km
Active Sensor Strength: 0.35   EM Sensitivity Modifier: 14
Resolution: 10    Maximum Range vs 500 ton object (or larger): 2,690,642 km
Cost Per Missile: 8.4312     Development Cost: 459
Second Stage: Bungelo II x1
Second Stage Separation Range: 1,190,000 km
Bungelo II payload.
Code: [Select]
Missile Size: 3.00 MSP  (7.500 Tons)     Warhead: 16    Radiation Damage: 16    Manoeuvre Rating: 22
Speed: 42,400 km/s     Fuel: 175     Flight Time: 40.9 seconds     Range: 1,734,160 km
Cost Per Missile: 7.8712     Development Cost: 443
Chance to Hit: 1k km/s 932.8%   3k km/s 310.9%   5k km/s 186.6%   10k km/s 93.3%

Am currently experimenting with maintenance stations at planetary or deep space populations to remove the need for overhauls.

Code: [Select]
Violet Windmill class Support Base      42,457 tons       439 Crew       1,164.5 BP       TCS 849    TH 0    EM 0
1 km/s      No Armour       Shields 0-0     HTK 64      Sensors 14/14/0/0      DCR 1      PPV 0
MSP 3,017    Max Repair 100 MSP
Cargo Shuttle Multiplier 3    Tractor Beam     
Seeker    Control Rating 1   BRG   
Intended Deployment Time: 3 months   
Maintenance Modules: 8 module(s) capable of supporting ships of 20,000 tons


Observer (1)     GPS 28     Range 11.2m km    MCR 1m km    Resolution 1
Deepest Heat (1)     Sensitivity 14     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  29.6m km
Yin (1)     Sensitivity 14     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  29.6m km

This design is classed as a Commercial Vessel for maintenance purposes
This design is classed as a Space Station for construction purposes
This design is classed as a Maintenance Ship for auto-assignment purposes
« Last Edit: April 27, 2023, 08:44:45 AM by boolybooly »
 
The following users thanked this post: Xanithas

Offline Nori

  • Bug Moderators
  • Lt. Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Thanked: 42 times
  • Discord Username: Nori Silverrage
  • Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter : Support the forums with a Bronze subscription
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
Re: Defence Bases and Other Defence Units
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2023, 07:21:34 PM »
In the past I usually create a cheap "patrol" class of ship that would work well in a situation like this. I give it 2-5 years of deployment and slow, but efficient engines. I believe the last one I made was about half the speed. I would do a PD version and a anti ship version. Logistically it's a lot simpler vs static bases. Easier to retrofit, refuel, overhaul or move. I tended to keep these in service a lot longer too as their role works well for even outdated ships. If there is a actual incursion somewhere, my A team fleet comes out...
 

Offline Xanithas (OP)

  • Chief Petty Officer
  • ***
  • X
  • Posts: 44
  • Thanked: 15 times
Re: Defence Bases and Other Defence Units
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2023, 09:05:06 PM »
Thank you both for the feedback! I am not good at missiles and tend to avoid them but given the general consensus that they are the most effective I threw together a base to employ some but I am interested in feedback, especially on the missiles themselves. I know box launchers are technically the best bang for my buck when it comes to producing volumes of fire but in this instance I feel that I am looking for something more in the Rate of Fire department as I assess I wouldn't need too many missiles to turn star swarm fighter craft into dust and the jumpshock should render them nearly defenseless for a short time. Additionally I looked at boolyboolys post and designed a mine / mine layer as well. Again I would appreciate it if I could get a sanity check, especially with the missiles.

The Ballista was my take on your feedback that a missile base might be the best choice. My intention is to station these 5M from the jump point in pairs and have them fire missiles in groups of 2 at enemy craft. I went with a pretty chunky missile as I will only get a few shots before they can return fire so I figured I should make them count

Code: [Select]
Ballista class Missile Base      5,000 tons       184 Crew       807.6 BP       TCS 100    TH 0    EM 0
1 km/s      Armour 1-26       Shields 0-0       HTK 50      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 3      PPV 48
Maint Life 11.41 Years     MSP 2,672    AFR 67%    IFR 0.9%    1YR 38    5YR 565    Max Repair 110 MSP
Magazine 452   
Lieutenant Commander    Control Rating 2   BRG   AUX   
Intended Deployment Time: 120 months    Morale Check Required   


Longbow Strike Missile VLS (6)     Missile Size: 8.00    Rate of Fire 20
Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace "Archer" Longbow MFC (3)     Range 12.8m km    Resolution 1
Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace Longbow Strike Missile (54)    Speed: 90,000 km/s    End: 1.9m     Range: 10.4m km    WH: 9    Size: 8    TH: 330/198/99

Missile to hit chances are vs targets moving at 3000 km/s, 5000 km/s and 10,000 km/s

This design is classed as a Military Vessel for maintenance purposes
This design is classed as a Warship for auto-assignment purposes

This is the missile they use, the Longbow was something I cooked up a while back to make some fighter bombers and started to build the missiles before I decided to shelve the idea when the NPR I encountered had a thing for AMMs.....
Code: [Select]
Missile Size: 8.0000 MSP  (20.00000 Tons)     Warhead: 12    Radiation Damage: 12    Manoeuvre Rating: 11
Speed: 112,500 km/s     Fuel: 1,171     Flight Time: 2 minutes     Range: 13.8m km
Cost Per Missile: 25.580384     Development Cost: 799
Chance to Hit: 1k km/s 1237.5%   3k km/s 412.5%   5k km/s 247.5%   10k km/s 123.8%

Reading about your idea of a Mine was down right inspiring, I build buoys before but a mine literally never occurred to me. I threw this together and then realized I have little practical idea of how to use them. My plan is to drop them on the jump point but if I understand them correctly they will all target the same ship so its best to space them out so I will work out a pattern for them at some point.
Code: [Select]
Missile Size: 24.8138 MSP  (62.03450 Tons)     Warhead: 0    Radiation Damage: 0    Manoeuvre Rating: 10
Speed: 0 km/s     Fuel: 4,336     1st Stage Flight Time: 1 seconds    1st Stage Range: 0k km
2nd Stage Flight Time: 3 minutes    2nd Stage Range: 10.19m km
Active Sensor Strength: 0.94   EM Sensitivity Modifier: 18
Resolution: 100    Maximum Range vs 5000 ton object (or larger): 10,771,877 km
Cost Per Missile: 53.520896     Development Cost: 1156
Second Stage: Wedel Mine Submunition x4
Second Stage Separation Range: 150,000 km
Chance to Hit: 1k km/s 0%   3k km/s 0%   5k km/s 0%   10k km/s 0%


The warhead, I went with multiple sub munitions as that seemed the best idea to overwhelm point defense but I do see the merit of a massive warhead as well
Code: [Select]
Missile Size: 5.9178 MSP  (14.79450 Tons)     Warhead: 12    Radiation Damage: 12    Manoeuvre Rating: 12
Speed: 76,616 km/s     Fuel: 1,084     Flight Time: 3 minutes     Range: 13.78m km
Active Sensor Strength: 0.94   EM Sensitivity Modifier: 18
Resolution: 100    Maximum Range vs 5000 ton object (or larger): 10,771,877 km
Cost Per Missile: 16.024224     Development Cost: 632
Chance to Hit: 1k km/s 919.4%   3k km/s 306.5%   5k km/s 183.9%   10k km/s 91.9%

again the feedback is amazing and appreciated!
 

Offline Xanithas (OP)

  • Chief Petty Officer
  • ***
  • X
  • Posts: 44
  • Thanked: 15 times
Re: Defence Bases and Other Defence Units
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2023, 09:07:00 PM »
In the past I usually create a cheap "patrol" class of ship that would work well in a situation like this. I give it 2-5 years of deployment and slow, but efficient engines. I believe the last one I made was about half the speed. I would do a PD version and a anti ship version. Logistically it's a lot simpler vs static bases. Easier to retrofit, refuel, overhaul or move. I tended to keep these in service a lot longer too as their role works well for even outdated ships. If there is a actual incursion somewhere, my A team fleet comes out...

I kinda have something like this already, I used a smaller 5k sized ship with fairly quick engines to protect systems and ward off pirates and the occasional invader but I saw the distance between the jump points and the planets drew me to something more static. Do you recommend missiles for this role, my beam ships are effective but fairly expensive to be thrown away cheaply?
« Last Edit: April 27, 2023, 09:09:58 PM by Xanithas »
 

Offline Nori

  • Bug Moderators
  • Lt. Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Thanked: 42 times
  • Discord Username: Nori Silverrage
  • Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter : Support the forums with a Bronze subscription
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
Re: Defence Bases and Other Defence Units
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2023, 10:14:26 PM »
Yeah for a patrol ship like this I would do missiles. Depending on how close resupply is you might be able to do really cheap box launchers. Gauss or something for the PD ships though.

Your missile base looks pretty good except I would make a couple changes. Even if you don't think it'll get shot at, a military vessel really should have some kind of armor. I would consider 4-6 layers a minimum.
Second, 6 launchers isn't a lot, but if you are intending to have a few bases it'll probably be fine, especially with such fast missiles. One thing to consider is a slower reload rate to let you cram a few more launchers in. For a antiship missile 20 seconds is a really fast reload. With the range afforded by the missiles you should be able to place these a little further away and give yourself plenty of chances for several volleys if need be.
 
The following users thanked this post: Xanithas

Offline nuclearslurpee

  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2960
  • Thanked: 2222 times
  • Radioactive frozen beverage.
Re: Defence Bases and Other Defence Units
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2023, 11:16:14 PM »
Second, 6 launchers isn't a lot, but if you are intending to have a few bases it'll probably be fine, especially with such fast missiles. One thing to consider is a slower reload rate to let you cram a few more launchers in. For a antiship missile 20 seconds is a really fast reload. With the range afforded by the missiles you should be able to place these a little further away and give yourself plenty of chances for several volleys if need be.

For anti-small craft work, usually it is better to have fewer launchers with the maximum reload rate, as this allows you to have more total missiles (using magazines) which can be fired until all targets have some assigned ordnance in flight, provided you have sufficient range to do so. Presuming enemy craft have a closing speed of, say, 10,000 km/s, they will close 200,000 km between volleys, so a range in excess of 2 million km will allow you to fire your entire magazine load with this design.

The one challenge here is point defense, a swarm of beam-armed small craft which are in formation can put up a sufficient final fire PD screen to avoid damage. The best way to counter this is usually ECM on the missiles, since small craft usually lack ECCM and will not be able to get a workable hit rate for final fire PD. On a size 8 missile I think devoting 0.25 MSP to ECM should be easy enough to do.

If you do not have ECM capabilities, then box launchers (with enough MFCs to target only a few missiles per enemy craft) are probably safer as a single overwhelming salvo will overwhelm most small craft swarms' ad-hoc PD in this case.
 
The following users thanked this post: Xanithas

Offline boolybooly

  • Lieutenant
  • *******
  • Posts: 171
  • Thanked: 87 times
Re: Defence Bases and Other Defence Units
« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2023, 06:08:06 PM »
Looks like fun.

Just noticed the "Second Stage Separation Range" (SSSR) on your Wedel Mine base Xanithas, is the default 150,000 km. I am guessing that is not intended.

It is easily missed, which is how I finally learned to edit a save and change missile designs! [EDIT though thinking about it, the missile design dialogue does not refresh SSSR if you view the researched design and copy the text for display, I just remembered, so I may be preaching to the choir here.]

As I understand it, SSSR determines max range for mine activation, so a missile 10m km range with SSSR 150k km wastes several million kms of coverage / fuel.

I do a little sum to work out mine SSSR which is simply : missile max range - (missile flight time * max hostile speed) to decide roughly how far away a target can be on mine activation and still be hit and set SSSR to a little less than that for luck.

« Last Edit: April 29, 2023, 04:32:10 AM by boolybooly »