Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Please read the rules before you post!


Topic Summary

Posted by: Jorgen_CAB
« on: February 03, 2021, 02:20:58 PM »

Quote from: froggiest1982 on February 03, 2021, 02:09:36 PM
Quote from: Jorgen_CAB on February 03, 2021, 02:01:47 PM
Quote from: froggiest1982 on February 03, 2021, 01:47:51 PM
Quote from: Jorgen_CAB on February 03, 2021, 08:32:39 AM
Quote from: TMaekler on February 03, 2021, 08:30:45 AM
Yeah, Steve should look at his code and see if everything works as planned and maybe give us a more specific explanation as to what stacks and what does and should not.

It is easy to check if it stack or not... if it do we should just submit a bug for it.

For example Troopp transports don't currently need Cargo Bays to load/unload troops even if they should, so that is a bug.

I think not really. Oh well let me explain. If you read here

http://aurora2.pentarch.org/index.php?topic=8495.msg105591#msg105591

When Steve says at the end of the post: "This will affect troop transport in a different way and that will be covered in a separate post." let us think that there should be a similar mechanic or it could also be possible that Cargo Bays would have been used for troop transport but who knows?

Why?

Well because that later post did non happen or I haven't seen it so if it is the latter I apologize in advance.

It is entirely possible that he forgot or just not got there yet with coding.

I have already submitted it as a bug so let's see... I'm very sure it is suppose to require Cargo Bays to load/unload troops as that make zero sense otherwise as ships can't land on planets if they are bigger than 500t. It might suppose to work differently and that he never got round to code the difference, but it surely is not suppose to work as it currently does.

Right now putting a Cargo Bay with a multiplier of "1" does nothing while a multiplier of 2 halves the time to unload troops. So it clearly is weird right now.

Oh don't get me wrong, I absolutely agree with you. I was just highlighting that there was "something" in his mind that was suppose to happen there that obviously did not. If cargo bays should have just worked with Troop Transport he would have included in the post but he said "in a different way" so I wonder what this different way is.

At the moment they don't matter at all, which is different so....

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Agreed!
Posted by: Froggiest1982
« on: February 03, 2021, 02:09:36 PM »

Quote from: Jorgen_CAB on February 03, 2021, 02:01:47 PM
Quote from: froggiest1982 on February 03, 2021, 01:47:51 PM
Quote from: Jorgen_CAB on February 03, 2021, 08:32:39 AM
Quote from: TMaekler on February 03, 2021, 08:30:45 AM
Yeah, Steve should look at his code and see if everything works as planned and maybe give us a more specific explanation as to what stacks and what does and should not.

It is easy to check if it stack or not... if it do we should just submit a bug for it.

For example Troopp transports don't currently need Cargo Bays to load/unload troops even if they should, so that is a bug.

I think not really. Oh well let me explain. If you read here

http://aurora2.pentarch.org/index.php?topic=8495.msg105591#msg105591

When Steve says at the end of the post: "This will affect troop transport in a different way and that will be covered in a separate post." let us think that there should be a similar mechanic or it could also be possible that Cargo Bays would have been used for troop transport but who knows?

Why?

Well because that later post did non happen or I haven't seen it so if it is the latter I apologize in advance.

It is entirely possible that he forgot or just not got there yet with coding.

I have already submitted it as a bug so let's see... I'm very sure it is suppose to require Cargo Bays to load/unload troops as that make zero sense otherwise as ships can't land on planets if they are bigger than 500t. It might suppose to work differently and that he never got round to code the difference, but it surely is not suppose to work as it currently does.

Right now putting a Cargo Bay with a multiplier of "1" does nothing while a multiplier of 2 halves the time to unload troops. So it clearly is weird right now.

Oh don't get me wrong, I absolutely agree with you. I was just highlighting that there was "something" in his mind that was suppose to happen there that obviously did not. If cargo bays should have just worked with Troop Transport he would have included in the post but he said "in a different way" so I wonder what this different way is.

At the moment they don't matter at all, which is different so....

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Posted by: Jorgen_CAB
« on: February 03, 2021, 02:01:47 PM »

Quote from: froggiest1982 on February 03, 2021, 01:47:51 PM
Quote from: Jorgen_CAB on February 03, 2021, 08:32:39 AM
Quote from: TMaekler on February 03, 2021, 08:30:45 AM
Yeah, Steve should look at his code and see if everything works as planned and maybe give us a more specific explanation as to what stacks and what does and should not.

It is easy to check if it stack or not... if it do we should just submit a bug for it.

For example Troopp transports don't currently need Cargo Bays to load/unload troops even if they should, so that is a bug.

I think not really. Oh well let me explain. If you read here

http://aurora2.pentarch.org/index.php?topic=8495.msg105591#msg105591

When Steve says at the end of the post: "This will affect troop transport in a different way and that will be covered in a separate post." let us think that there should be a similar mechanic or it could also be possible that Cargo Bays would have been used for troop transport but who knows?

Why?

Well because that later post did non happen or I haven't seen it so if it is the latter I apologize in advance.

It is entirely possible that he forgot or just not got there yet with coding.

I have already submitted it as a bug so let's see... I'm very sure it is suppose to require Cargo Bays to load/unload troops as that make zero sense otherwise as ships can't land on planets if they are bigger than 500t. It might suppose to work differently and that he never got round to code the difference, but it surely is not suppose to work as it currently does.

Right now putting a Cargo Bay with a multiplier of "1" does nothing while a multiplier of 2 halves the time to unload troops. So it clearly is weird right now.
Posted by: Froggiest1982
« on: February 03, 2021, 01:47:51 PM »

Quote from: Jorgen_CAB on February 03, 2021, 08:32:39 AM
Quote from: TMaekler on February 03, 2021, 08:30:45 AM
Yeah, Steve should look at his code and see if everything works as planned and maybe give us a more specific explanation as to what stacks and what does and should not.

It is easy to check if it stack or not... if it do we should just submit a bug for it.

For example Troopp transports don't currently need Cargo Bays to load/unload troops even if they should, so that is a bug.

I think not really. Oh well let me explain. If you read here

http://aurora2.pentarch.org/index.php?topic=8495.msg105591#msg105591

When Steve says at the end of the post: "This will affect troop transport in a different way and that will be covered in a separate post." let us think that there should be a similar mechanic or it could also be possible that Cargo Bays would have been used for troop transport but who knows?

Why?

Well because that later post did non happen or I haven't seen it so if it is the latter I apologize in advance.

It is entirely possible that he forgot or just not got there yet with coding.
Posted by: brondi00
« on: February 03, 2021, 09:59:35 AM »

Your conclusion jives with my experience.  Just to throw in my two cents.

Early game I'll just have a 25k cargo ship.  Then later I'll add a 125k version for longer runs and less time sensitive things.

The smaller one is faster and loads/unloads faster and the big one is a barge.  Slow, cheap, but moving lots of stuff at once. 

It's worked well for me
Posted by: Jorgen_CAB
« on: February 03, 2021, 09:18:08 AM »

I just did some clinical test of this so we can all be sure how it works and it seem to work exactly as Steve said and intended.

Cargo Stations and Spaceports do NOT stack...

Cargo Bays stack, they even stack with the Cargo Stations and Spaceports. So a single Cargo Bay loading at a colony with a Cargo Station will load and unload twice as fast.

One effect is that ships with smaller cargo hold will be significantly more effective in terms of loading/unloading cargo while larger ships are cheaper and cost slightly less fuel to haul the same mass. Such as these two ships...

Code: [Select]
Adelaide class Cargo Ship      51,840 tons       227 Crew       803.6 BP       TCS 1,037    TH 2,500    EM 0
2411 km/s      Armour 1-123       Shields 0-0       HTK 61      Sensors 4/4/0/0      DCR 1      PPV 0
MSP 9    Max Repair 100.000 MSP
Cargo 25,000    Cargo Shuttle Multiplier 1   
Squire    Control Rating 1   BRG   
Intended Deployment Time: 3 months   

Commercial Ion Drive  EP500.00 (5)    Power 2500.0    Fuel Use 1.92%    Signature 500.00    Explosion 4%
Fuel Capacity 250,000 Litres    Range 45.2 billion km (217 days at full power)

EM Sensor EM0.4-4.4 (1)     Sensitivity 4.4     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  16.6m km
Thermal Sensor TH0.4-4.4 (1)     Sensitivity 4.4     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  16.6m km

This design is classed as a Commercial Vessel for maintenance purposes

Code: [Select]
Australia class Cargo Ship      257,247 tons       1,077 Crew       3,535.1 BP       TCS 5,145    TH 12,500    EM 0
2429 km/s      Armour 1-360       Shields 0-0       HTK 296      Sensors 4/4/0/0      DCR 1      PPV 0
MSP 8    Max Repair 200 MSP
Cargo 125,000    Cargo Shuttle Multiplier 5   
Squire    Control Rating 1   BRG   
Intended Deployment Time: 3 months   

Commercial Ion Drive  EP500.00 (25)    Power 12500.0    Fuel Use 1.92%    Signature 500.00    Explosion 4%
Fuel Capacity 1,250,000 Litres    Range 45.5 billion km (217 days at full power)

EM Sensor EM0.4-4.4 (1)     Sensitivity 4.4     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  16.6m km
Thermal Sensor TH0.4-4.4 (1)     Sensitivity 4.4     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  16.6m km

This design is classed as a Commercial Vessel for maintenance purposes
Five of the first ships will load roughly 40% faster than the second larger ship if a station is present. The reason is that each of the four smaller ships get assistance individually. But in general loading and unloading is still fast enough that I think the total cost involved for producing the ships is more important. In this case 3553 versus 4018 BP. You probably could throw in a few extra Cargo Shuttle bays in the larger ship to make the difference in loading marginal and still get a cheaper version of the larger one.

Important to note however is that adding cargo shuttle bays have a diminishing return and the speed reduction will often impact the rate at which you deliver goods, so be careful. If you make short trips, say deliver goods in Sol at the start of the game then loading times will be more important, when a round trip are more like a 6-12 months then speed is way more important. More speed also means that any installation you deliver will be inactive for less time.

Use large cargo ships for long runs and small cargo ships for shorter runs, that makes best use of either type. This also seem to fit very good with how I build my cargo ships... I usually have them in cargo sizes of 5000, 10.000, 25.000 and 125.000. I have 5000t mineral haulers that have no Cargo Bays at all, they rely solely on Cargo Stations and Spaceport and is only used to deliver minerals to colonies. I use 10.000t cargo ships with jump drives to support starting colonies with infrastructures, these are as fast as I can make them and I also have a matching colony ship type as well. 25.000t cargo ship are my mid size freighters that deliver most stuff at shorter distances one or two system max then the large 125kt cargo hold ships as the main work horse for long distance hauling.
Posted by: Jorgen_CAB
« on: February 03, 2021, 08:32:39 AM »

Quote from: TMaekler on February 03, 2021, 08:30:45 AM
Yeah, Steve should look at his code and see if everything works as planned and maybe give us a more specific explanation as to what stacks and what does and should not.

It is easy to check if it stack or not... if it do we should just submit a bug for it.

For example Troopp transports don't currently need Cargo Bays to load/unload troops even if they should, so that is a bug.
Posted by: TMaekler
« on: February 03, 2021, 08:30:45 AM »

Yeah, Steve should look at his code and see if everything works as planned and maybe give us a more specific explanation as to what stacks and what does and should not.
Posted by: Jorgen_CAB
« on: February 03, 2021, 05:48:07 AM »

Quote from: xenoscepter on February 03, 2021, 05:43:20 AM
Cargo Shuttle Stations and Cargo Shuttle Bays DO stack, Spaceports AFAIK do not. These are useful for loading and unloading MSP, as the Cargo Shuttles stack with the Maintenance Facilities.

According to Steve that I referenced above then Cargo Stations don't stack, if they do it probably is a bug. I have not checked if they do.
Posted by: xenoscepter
« on: February 03, 2021, 05:43:20 AM »

Cargo Shuttle Stations and Cargo Shuttle Bays DO stack, Spaceports AFAIK do not. These are useful for loading and unloading MSP, as the Cargo Shuttles stack with the Maintenance Facilities.
Posted by: TMaekler
« on: February 03, 2021, 12:11:02 AM »

Quote from: nuclearslurpee on February 02, 2021, 07:34:28 PM
Per the wiki Spaceports do in fact "stack" in that multiple do reduce logistics operation rates. As this is the C# wiki page I would like to assume it is correct but there is no source post linked. However I do note that the wiki has the correct BP cost from the DB, and glancing through the changes thread indicates that the Spaceport changed quite a bit during development into its final form; on the other hand the "stacking" mechanic was from VB6 so I wouldn't be surprised if that was copied over and never fixed.
If I am reading Steves post correct using a Spaceport AND a Cargo Shuttle Bay means: no stacking effect.
On the other hand using TWO Cargo Shuttle Bays OR TWO Spaceports means: YES, they stack.

Basically if you have a spaceport on the planet AND one Cargo Shuttle Bay on a ship it would be the same loading and unloading time as if there was only a spaceport OR only a Cargo Shuttle Bay on the ship.

But I would need to go in game to verify.
Posted by: nuclearslurpee
« on: February 02, 2021, 07:34:28 PM »

Quote from: Jorgen_CAB on February 02, 2021, 05:30:18 PM
One thing is that Spaceports no longer stack, they simply count as a single cargo bay but can service any number of ships simultaneously. http://aurora2.pentarch.org/index.php?topic=8495.msg105591#msg105591

Per the wiki Spaceports do in fact "stack" in that multiple do reduce logistics operation rates. As this is the C# wiki page I would like to assume it is correct but there is no source post linked. However I do note that the wiki has the correct BP cost from the DB, and glancing through the changes thread indicates that the Spaceport changed quite a bit during development into its final form; on the other hand the "stacking" mechanic was from VB6 so I wouldn't be surprised if that was copied over and never fixed.

Anyone have hard data about this?
Posted by: Jorgen_CAB
« on: February 02, 2021, 06:16:16 PM »

Quote from: TheTalkingMeowth on February 02, 2021, 05:55:01 PM
Just to be absolutely clear, a cargo shuttle station cannot refuel ships. There is a separate installation for that.

A spaceport, on the other hand, CAN refuel as well as handling cargo.

I just pointed out that I use Cargo Station on Supply and Refuel locations that don't have any population. You need a Refuelling Station to refuel ships and an Ordnance station to restock ship missile ammunition.

If you want a colony with population to act as a resupply and refuel location you should probably put a Spaceport there.
Posted by: TheTalkingMeowth
« on: February 02, 2021, 05:55:01 PM »

Quote from: Jorgen_CAB on February 02, 2021, 05:30:18 PM
One thing is that Spaceports no longer stack, they simply count as a single cargo bay but can service any number of ships simultaneously. http://aurora2.pentarch.org/index.php?topic=8495.msg105591#msg105591

I most often put a space station on my major colony of every system as this colony then can act as a supply and resupply location. Most other colonies usually just get a Cargo Station. The other reason for the Cargo Station is that it does not need any population so is good for any supply and refuel point that don't have any population.

Just to be absolutely clear, a cargo shuttle station cannot refuel ships. There is a separate installation for that.

A spaceport, on the other hand, CAN refuel as well as handling cargo.
Posted by: Jorgen_CAB
« on: February 02, 2021, 05:30:18 PM »

One thing is that Spaceports no longer stack, they simply count as a single cargo bay but can service any number of ships simultaneously. http://aurora2.pentarch.org/index.php?topic=8495.msg105591#msg105591

I most often put a space station on my major colony of every system as this colony then can act as a supply and refuel location. Most other colonies usually just get a Cargo Station. The other reason for the Cargo Station is that it does not need any population so is good for any supply and refuel point that don't have any population.