Aurora Electrons - Looking Inwards v0.8.10

[Arwyn]

Okay, downloaded this and took a look, and I have to say, this is one USEFUL little application.

The warnings tab is highly useful, for me, spotting unused populations is really handy.

[prunkstation (OP)]

New version v0.5.5:

🐛 Fixed a bug in warnings (ordnance and fighter production)

[alex_g]

New version v0.  5.  4:

? Highlight system on map, better map colors

Do you think you'll add a search function to it?

I added a rudimentary highlight function to the map.   For now it's a simple select dropdown that highlights, zooms and centers on a system but maybe it'll be of help. 

It's great, it helps me a lot, thanks for the fast implementation.   

I also just noticed I forgot to stabilize some jumps points thanks to the 'Gated from System' message. 


Later Edit: I just noticed that on the warning tabs, I have 50 ships in low maintenance, out of the ships displayed only 1 has below 20% (red) and about 7 have above 85% (green).  I'm guessing this is a bug.

[prunkstation (OP)]

I guess it's a matter of interpretation. To me any ship with used MSP is in the "low maintenance" category and to be directed to a spaceport at their earliest convenience.
But I'm open to differing suggestions. What would be a sensible threshold?

[Froggiest1982]

I am not a fan of these things but I must admit, your Mineral Sheet is top notch and I can really use it like every day!

Improved Aurora user experience 10/10.

something really cool would be the ability to remove systems from the list by clicking directly on them, so you could work by exclusion.



Thanks

[prunkstation (OP)]

something really cool would be the ability to remove systems from the list by clicking directly on them, so you could work by exclusion.

I'll look into it, I think there's some wiggle room there. It's going to make the system list bulkier but shouldn't be too bad.

[alex_g]

I guess it's a matter of interpretation.  To me any ship with used MSP is in the "low maintenance" category and to be directed to a spaceport at their earliest convenience.
But I'm open to differing suggestions.  What would be a sensible threshold?

70-80% of the ships in my list are survey ships and in my case they're the least of my concern as they have the 'if supply below 20%' standing order.

I'm guessing for each person the threshold is different as we each play the game in our own way, the suggestion I have would be to allow the user to select the threshold for which the warning should show.  And an extra suggestion I would have would be to filter out ship classes.

As an example, if I'd be able to apply my own filter and threshold I would probably go somewhere at 50% and exclude my survey ships so I can monitor my just my warships and my space stations. 

Don't get me wrong, the list is useful as is, thanks to it I just realized I forgot to re-instate a supply line to a space station after a refit, however, in my case, it took some time for me to notice this due to the list being mostly survey ships.

[Warer]

Dis great, Thanks.

[Rich.h]

Is it possible to have utilities like this work on an interval read basis instead of needing a saved db? For my current game the save function takes a reasonable amount of time now, that I don't use it very often. That sadly would make tools like this tricky to get the full use out of them.

[Droll]

Is it possible to have utilities like this work on an interval read basis instead of needing a saved db? For my current game the save function takes a reasonable amount of time now, that I don't use it very often. That sadly would make tools like this tricky to get the full use out of them.

Was about to post this exact thing

[prunkstation (OP)]

Is it possible to have utilities like this work on an interval read basis instead of needing a saved db? For my current game the save function takes a reasonable amount of time now, that I don't use it very often. That sadly would make tools like this tricky to get the full use out of them.

Sadly for everyone that is not possible.

[Droll]

I cri evertim 

[prunkstation (OP)]

New version v0.6.0

Download: https://github.com/rubybrowncoat/Aurora-Electrons/releases/tag/v0.6.0


Changelog

something really cool would be the ability to remove systems from the list by clicking directly on them, so you could work by exclusion.

? Removable active system chips in mineral breakdown




👌 Thinnest remaining layer on armor damaged ships




? Map filter as autocomplete

I'm guessing for each person the threshold is different as we each play the game in our own way, the suggestion I have would be to allow the user to select the threshold for which the warning should show.  And an extra suggestion I would have would be to filter out ship classes.

? Maintenance threshold configuration

[alex_g]

New version v0. 6. 0

Download: https://github. com/rubybrowncoat/Aurora-Electrons/releases/tag/v0. 6. 0


Changelog

something really cool would be the ability to remove systems from the list by clicking directly on them, so you could work by exclusion.

? Removable active system chips in mineral breakdown




👌 Thinnest remaining layer on armor damaged ships




? Map filter as autocomplete

I'm guessing for each person the threshold is different as we each play the game in our own way, the suggestion I have would be to allow the user to select the threshold for which the warning should show.   And an extra suggestion I would have would be to filter out ship classes. 

? Maintenance threshold configuration

You are both amazing and very fast at work.  Thank you!

[prunkstation (OP)]

New version v0.7.0

Download: https://github.com/rubybrowncoat/Aurora-Electrons/releases/tag/v0.7.0


Changelog

? Updated mineral potential formula




? System body survey status on the map




? Habitability breakdown