Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Please read the rules before you post!


Topic Summary

Posted by: Density
« on: October 22, 2021, 07:46:24 AM »

Quote from: xenoscepter on October 21, 2021, 02:21:19 PM
Quote from: nakorkren on October 21, 2021, 02:06:58 PM
How is it that all those asteroids have a colony cost of 1 when they don't have water, which I thought would make it a minimum colony cost of 2? I've never tried colonizing anything that required low G infrastructure... does low G infrastructure negate the need for hydro extent or something?

 --- I have no idea, to be honest with you. Might be a bug, might be WAI. Steve himself would need to weigh in on this as far as I know.

Given that the venusian in the first picture has a pressure factor of 50 but the body has a cc of 25, I'm guessing this race has the CC Reduction tech at 50%.
Posted by: Droll
« on: October 21, 2021, 02:49:38 PM »

53bn carrying capacity would make for a hell of a shipyard complex.
Posted by: xenoscepter
« on: October 21, 2021, 02:21:19 PM »

Quote from: nakorkren on October 21, 2021, 02:06:58 PM
How is it that all those asteroids have a colony cost of 1 when they don't have water, which I thought would make it a minimum colony cost of 2? I've never tried colonizing anything that required low G infrastructure... does low G infrastructure negate the need for hydro extent or something?

 --- I have no idea, to be honest with you. Might be a bug, might be WAI. Steve himself would need to weigh in on this as far as I know.
Posted by: nakorkren
« on: October 21, 2021, 02:06:58 PM »

How is it that all those asteroids have a colony cost of 1 when they don't have water, which I thought would make it a minimum colony cost of 2? I've never tried colonizing anything that required low G infrastructure... does low G infrastructure negate the need for hydro extent or something?
Posted by: Jorgen_CAB
« on: October 21, 2021, 02:24:36 AM »

Sometimes you are just lucky I guess... :)
Posted by: xenoscepter
« on: October 21, 2021, 01:15:34 AM »

They're packed with minerals, PACKED! 0.10 accessibility, but WHO CARES? Minerals in the tens of millions! This gonna fund expansion for the next millennium! Time to find some aliums to fight oh yeah!
Posted by: xenoscepter
« on: October 21, 2021, 01:03:53 AM »

ADDENDUM: Holy moly System #9991 is a QUATERNARY System. Four stars, one of them has even more habitable worlds and another has a Gas Giant. ohboyohboyohboy ;D
Posted by: xenoscepter
« on: October 21, 2021, 12:54:06 AM »









 --- Holy crap! All that fuel, and look at all those asteroids just ripe for the pickings! All of this just one jump away from Sol, too! Wow! :o