Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Please read the rules before you post!


Topic Summary

Posted by: SpikeTheHobbitMage
« on: May 14, 2020, 09:01:43 AM »

I am asking because I don't know, but would dust kicked up by orbital bombardment stay up for an appreciable time in a vacuum? I guess it could be re-suspended if an atmosphere is created but more probably would form some sort of accretion if left in vacuum for a few months.

Perhaps some budding astronomer could provide an answer.
It shouldn't.  Without air to hold it up the dust should be purely ballistic.  Anything that doesn't achieve orbit* or escape velocity should fall within a couple of hours at most, depending on local gravity.  A super-bolide like what killed the dinosaurs hitting a high gravity world like Earth can put up enough material that it takes a couple of weeks to clear, but an orbital bombardment shouldn't be anywhere near that scale.

That said, while I haven't tried it, I don't think that Aurora takes any of that into account.

*Orbit on airless worlds tends to mean 'high enough to clear obstacles'.
Posted by: IanD
« on: May 14, 2020, 08:45:15 AM »

I am asking because I don't know, but would dust kicked up by orbital bombardment stay up for an appreciable time in a vacuum? I guess it could be re-suspended if an atmosphere is created but more probably would form some sort of accretion if left in vacuum for a few months.

Perhaps some budding astronomer could provide an answer.