0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quite a few of my campaigns are Anglo-centric, so I decided to have only non-Anglo countries and avoid any unconscious bias.
Quote from: Steve Walmsley link=topic=10192. msg110662#msg110662 date=1540580739Quite a few of my campaigns are Anglo-centric, so I decided to have only non-Anglo countries and avoid any unconscious bias. I think that's a good idea. I'm thinking about doing a second player race in my own campaign, and I have to be careful not to be biased.
Quote from: MajGenRelativity link=topic=10192. msg110663#msg110663 date=1540580820Quote from: Steve Walmsley link=topic=10192. msg110662#msg110662 date=1540580739Quite a few of my campaigns are Anglo-centric, so I decided to have only non-Anglo countries and avoid any unconscious bias. I think that's a good idea. I'm thinking about doing a second player race in my own campaign, and I have to be careful not to be biased. It is super difficult to not be biased. . . no matter what you do it will bite you in the butt eventually. . . It is still super fun with multiple nations, so many fun options and combinations to test and try out.
I'm roooting for the Chinese. I just know those glow-in-the-dark, cave-dwelling, bombed-back-to-the-stone-age peasants will be able to turn things around!
If the goal was to avoid bias, why did the Chinese get blown up again?
Quote from: Happerry link=topic=10192. msg110690#msg110690 date=1540785282If the goal was to avoid bias, why did the Chinese get blown up again? Tradition. Not bias.
Woo! Go Kurita Fuchida! Dracs Japan forever!