I made a suggestion, and tried to answer people's questions about a component that I feel would fit well into the game as it stands at the moment. Now, you're saying it's a bad suggestion because it doesn't fit with your opinion of how the game should be played? Or did I misunderstand?
No, I think he is concerned that would not be balanced. When designing ships you should be faced with a series of choices that usually involve a trade-off between two or more competing factors. If that decision is obvious because one option is far better than the other, then it isn't a real choice, which is weak game design.
When adding anything new to Aurora, it should provide one of these trade-off choices and not simply be a replacement for an existing option, unless there is evidence the existing option is unbalanced (i.e weak original design). Because of this, people on the forums are often looking for a reasoned argument as to why the new choice represents either a new trade-off or improved game design. This has led to many very lively but well-informed debates conducted with mutual respect for other people's opinions.
In fact, I often seek competing opinions to my own just to make sure that my own view stands up to scrutiny. This forum is invaluable for Aurora in that regard. This is also true in my day job where I would only hire someone if I firmly believed they would stand up to me when they disagreed.
So when someone disagrees with you on here, they are not attacking you personally. They are just not convinced by the evidence you produced to back up your idea.