Posted by: sloanjh
« on: October 08, 2018, 07:35:38 AM »I've always found it annoying to have to stuff in a bunch of low cost/volume systems just to get up to a target size.
John
John
Quoteremove the requirement for the jump ship to be as large as the jump drive capacity
I love the convenience that'd give but I think it would cheapen gate builders a lot. are those still a thing in c# aurora?
remove the requirement for the jump ship to be as large as the jump drive capacity
I've been wondering whether to remove the requirement for the jump ship to be as large as the jump drive capacity. It would lead to smaller jump tenders and more tactical flexibility. However, it would also make large jump ships less critical than they are now.
Opens to comments on whether this would be a good idea or not.
Sure. As long as "small" is still large enough to move the jump ship itself. . . thus making the commercial jump drive entirely extraneous.I guess you could have the commercial jump drive in order to be able to tender larger commercial vessels rather than having a massive military jump engine that would be expensive