Author Topic: Corporate Federation - Comments  (Read 25205 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kurt (OP)

  • Gold Supporter
  • Vice Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thanked: 3389 times
  • 2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #45 on: August 20, 2018, 07:22:27 AM »
Glad to see you're able to start building meson PDCs to start taking some of the pressure off your ordinance factories - even though they're too slow like you said enough quantity can substitute for quality.  Then the freed-up production can go towards more Bludgeons, heh heh heh...

How's the mineral situation?  Are you experiencing any bottlenecks, considering how much you've had to turtle on Earth and just churn out missiles and ordinance factories?

The mineral situation is okay for now, but long-term the Republic is going to be behind the curve in moving its mining facilities off of Earth before the final depletion of the resources there.  As for the mesons, there really isn't any excuse for not building them right away, except that I didn't really think that Earth was going to pull through, and just didn't think of it.  In game terms, the chaos of the bombardment has caused much confusion in the upper command staff of the Republic, leading to a nearly constantly changing strategy that is only now settling down and firming up. 

Kurt
 

Offline Garfunkel

  • Registered
  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2797
  • Thanked: 1056 times
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #46 on: August 20, 2018, 03:28:10 PM »
Sol is clear!

Oh wait, four more battleships...

Incoming!
 

Offline Garfunkel

  • Registered
  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2797
  • Thanked: 1056 times
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #47 on: August 27, 2018, 03:09:04 PM »
It seems that the tide has turned!
 

Offline Neophyte

  • Gold Supporter
  • Warrant Officer, Class 2
  • *****
  • Posts: 65
  • Thanked: 25 times
  • Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #48 on: August 27, 2018, 03:59:12 PM »
Yeah, the perfidious aliens' days are numbered!  Probably a LOT of numbers, to be fair, but still!
 

Offline TMaekler

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1112
  • Thanked: 298 times
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #49 on: August 28, 2018, 09:40:13 AM »
Have never played with an NPR yet - except once. They plastered everything with jump gates and explored systems like crazy. Is there an overview of experiences with NPRs? Do they research quickly? I mostly refrained from using NPRs because I like a more "slow" research and "slow" buildup over centuries rather then rushing everything with 100+ research centers.
 

Offline TMaekler

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1112
  • Thanked: 298 times
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #50 on: August 30, 2018, 09:18:38 AM »
Quote
Bludgeon III LRASM
Speed: 31,200 km/s
Range: 395.6 mkm’s
Warhead: 20
Armor: 1
ECM: 2
Any particular reason for such an unusual warhead size?
 

Offline Kurt (OP)

  • Gold Supporter
  • Vice Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thanked: 3389 times
  • 2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #51 on: August 30, 2018, 01:22:11 PM »
Quote
Bludgeon III LRASM
Speed: 31,200 km/s
Range: 395.6 mkm’s
Warhead: 20
Armor: 1
ECM: 2
Any particular reason for such an unusual warhead size?

Unusual how?  Having said that, the reason is that it was the largest warhead I could fit on the missile and still have the range, ECM, armor, and sensors that I felt I could cram into the basic frame. 
 

Offline Rich.h

  • Captain
  • **********
  • R
  • Posts: 555
  • Thanked: 55 times
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #52 on: August 30, 2018, 02:26:21 PM »
Quote
Bludgeon III LRASM
Speed: 31,200 km/s
Range: 395.6 mkm’s
Warhead: 20
Armor: 1
ECM: 2
Any particular reason for such an unusual warhead size?

Unusual how?  Having said that, the reason is that it was the largest warhead I could fit on the missile and still have the range, ECM, armor, and sensors that I felt I could cram into the basic frame.

I would say the unusual damage comment is due to how missiles normally work. Due to their damage pattern missiles are most efficient when they have a square number for warhead amount. A strength 20 warhead will pierce the same amount of armour layers as a strength 16 warhead.
 

Offline TMaekler

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1112
  • Thanked: 298 times
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #53 on: August 31, 2018, 02:56:23 AM »
That is, what I meant. Thanks for the explanation.
 

Offline Kurt (OP)

  • Gold Supporter
  • Vice Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thanked: 3389 times
  • 2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #54 on: August 31, 2018, 10:33:00 AM »
That is, what I meant. Thanks for the explanation.

I understand now.  I usually design missiles by determining the speed I'll need, then adding the other things I think the missile needs, then finally putting the remaining space into the warhead.  If the warhead isn't big enough, then I rebalance the design (usually by reducing my soaring expectations) and come up with a warhead that will work.  I knew there were break-points for warhead strength based on the way the armor worked, but I usually don't let that affect my designs too much. 

Kurt
 

Offline Neophyte

  • Gold Supporter
  • Warrant Officer, Class 2
  • *****
  • Posts: 65
  • Thanked: 25 times
  • Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #55 on: September 01, 2018, 09:03:52 PM »
Looks like the Federation got caught in a little bit of a time loop! ;)
 

Offline Garfunkel

  • Registered
  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2797
  • Thanked: 1056 times
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #56 on: September 02, 2018, 10:03:20 AM »
Amusingly enough, there is a strong chance that my current game will develop to resemble this one. I only have minimal Fleet built and the enemy - right next door to Sol - seems to out-number, out-tech and out-mass me significantly. Following Kurt's example though, I've built loads and loads of PDCs to defend Earth, so we'll see.
 

Offline Kurt (OP)

  • Gold Supporter
  • Vice Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thanked: 3389 times
  • 2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #57 on: September 02, 2018, 10:11:00 AM »
Looks like the Federation got caught in a little bit of a time loop! ;)

Groundhog Day?  Maybe?

Ummmm...Oops?

Kurt
 

Offline Panopticon

  • Gold Supporter
  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • P
  • Posts: 883
  • Thanked: 37 times
  • Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #58 on: September 02, 2018, 11:33:59 PM »
That last ship exploding maybe an example of shock damage in action? or a lucky pair of missile hitting the same armor columns and a magazine maybe?
 

Offline Kurt (OP)

  • Gold Supporter
  • Vice Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thanked: 3389 times
  • 2021 Supporter 2021 Supporter : Donate for 2021
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter : Support the forums with a Gold subscription
    2022 Supporter 2022 Supporter : Donate for 2022
    2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Donate for 2023
Re: Corporate Federation - Comments
« Reply #59 on: September 03, 2018, 09:07:35 AM »
That last ship exploding maybe an example of shock damage in action? or a lucky pair of missile hitting the same armor columns and a magazine maybe?

That's certainly possible.  I can't remember if there were internal explosions listed for this battle.  This very thing has happened several times, confusing me, until I noticed the internal explosions.  Eventually I realized that all of the Dregluk ships I killed early on had already fired all of their missiles and thus had empty magazines, thus no internal explosions.  Several times Mammoth class BB's, which I know to have thick armor and to be very difficult to kill, have blown up after much fewer hits than it should take.  When I looked at the log I realized that in every case there was a massive internal explosion, or even several explosions.

Kurt