Posted by: waresky
« on: January 29, 2021, 09:46:01 AM »Ty for great effort and work. #C are AMAZING. Now am realy not "ViceAdmiral"...but..Cadet.
See ya..
And a warm hug from Italy.
Ciao!!!
See ya..
And a warm hug from Italy.
Ciao!!!
Yaaay, it is not flagged anymore, i can play
Yaaay, it is not flagged anymore, i can play
Name: Aurora1120.rar
Size: 4433764 bytes (4329 KiB)
SHA256: C068F21569BA2B73D63D742471EA17CBBFDD1BA279F1E25313FEC8C718C60E86
Hello, together.You need to change your system settings for the game to work correctly, the game takes the settings from Windows, the game doesn't tell Windows to change them.
Is it possible that we don't need to change the , and . ?
I have reinstalled the Game and doesn't change the , and . in the Region Settings on Windows.
But i am from Germany
I have tried to run 1. 12 patch but its very sluggish! Also the 1. 11 coloured events are not colored any more. Strange indeed!Event colours are only saved for that particular campaign. If you start a new one you have to set them again.
I have tried to run 1. 12 patch but its very sluggish! Also the 1. 11 coloured events are not colored any more. Strange indeed!Event colours are only saved for that particular campaign. If you start a new one you have to set them again.
I have tried to run 1. 12 patch but its very sluggish! Also the 1. 11 coloured events are not colored any more. Strange indeed!
The storage location doesn't affect any modifications made to the file during transit, and only protects the file vs the post to the extent that different passwords are (or should be) needed to affect both areas, although I'd guess there is an admin account somewhere that can affect the whole shabang.We should certainly not disregard the possibility that someone actually managed to get into the forum database and add something spicy to the aurora executable sometime after Steve uploaded it. I too am in favor of an MD5 (well, strictly if we want to be secure we should use something other than MD5 since thats been cracked, so a careful hacker could cover their tracks fairly easily compared to a SHA hash or something).
The file is stored completely separate from the forum software and files.
Speaking of passwords are any of them aurora123?
No, but that is the combination to my luggageQuoteOn a more serious note have you considered adding TLS/SSL for the forums?From the host, a dedicated certificate runs $100 a year with a $25 setup fee. See the Donations thread on why that probably won't happen
That would ensure that communication between the browser and the server is secure and that messages between them cannot be tampered with during transit.
The file path for the 1.12 patch is also on pentarch.org so I think it would also add security during file downloads.
The storage location doesn't affect any modifications made to the file during transit, and only protects the file vs the post to the extent that different passwords are (or should be) needed to affect both areas, although I'd guess there is an admin account somewhere that can affect the whole shabang.We should certainly not disregard the possibility that someone actually managed to get into the forum database and add something spicy to the aurora executable sometime after Steve uploaded it. I too am in favor of an MD5 (well, strictly if we want to be secure we should use something other than MD5 since thats been cracked, so a careful hacker could cover their tracks fairly easily compared to a SHA hash or something).
The file is stored completely separate from the forum software and files.
Speaking of passwords are any of them aurora123?
On a more serious note have you considered adding TLS/SSL for the forums?From the host, a dedicated certificate runs $100 a year with a $25 setup fee. See the Donations thread on why that probably won't happen
That would ensure that communication between the browser and the server is secure and that messages between them cannot be tampered with during transit.
The file path for the 1.12 patch is also on pentarch.org so I think it would also add security during file downloads.
Reasonable paranoia aside, I think this is pretty safe.For what it's worth the SHA of 1.12.0 I downloaded a few days ago matches the one in your post.
The storage location doesn't affect any modifications made to the file during transit, and only protects the file vs the post to the extent that different passwords are (or should be) needed to affect both areas, although I'd guess there is an admin account somewhere that can affect the whole shabang.We should certainly not disregard the possibility that someone actually managed to get into the forum database and add something spicy to the aurora executable sometime after Steve uploaded it. I too am in favor of an MD5 (well, strictly if we want to be secure we should use something other than MD5 since thats been cracked, so a careful hacker could cover their tracks fairly easily compared to a SHA hash or something).
The file is stored completely separate from the forum software and files.
We should certainly not disregard the possibility that someone actually managed to get into the forum database and add something spicy to the aurora executable sometime after Steve uploaded it. I too am in favor of an MD5 (well, strictly if we want to be secure we should use something other than MD5 since thats been cracked, so a careful hacker could cover their tracks fairly easily compared to a SHA hash or something).