Posted by: vorpal+5
« on: December 27, 2020, 12:51:12 PM »ok got it, the 2 is now very clear in the weapon specs. Thanks a lot!
Posted by: clement
« on: December 27, 2020, 09:10:03 AM »Every weapon that uses power has two values, 10-2, which show the amount of power the weapon needs to fire and the maximum amount of power it can draw from the reactors each 5 second tick.
Your carronades each need 10 power to fire, due to their tech level. Each carronade can draw up to 2 units of power power 5 second tick, due to their capacitor level. Your reactor creates 10 power per tick.
As it is right now, your weapons will draw a total of 4 power each Rich, leaving 6 to be wasted. Your weapons will be able to fire every 5 ticks which matches with the ROF 25 of the weapon which is it's Rate of Fire in seconds.
As dr125 pointed out, you could reduce the size of your reactor to output 4 energy and maintain the full fire rate for the weapons. This would increase the ship's speed due to a lower mass. Or, you could give it a second size 4 reactor for redundancy in case one gets knocked out.
Your carronades each need 10 power to fire, due to their tech level. Each carronade can draw up to 2 units of power power 5 second tick, due to their capacitor level. Your reactor creates 10 power per tick.
As it is right now, your weapons will draw a total of 4 power each Rich, leaving 6 to be wasted. Your weapons will be able to fire every 5 ticks which matches with the ROF 25 of the weapon which is it's Rate of Fire in seconds.
As dr125 pointed out, you could reduce the size of your reactor to output 4 energy and maintain the full fire rate for the weapons. This would increase the ship's speed due to a lower mass. Or, you could give it a second size 4 reactor for redundancy in case one gets knocked out.
Posted by: xenoscepter
« on: December 27, 2020, 08:43:59 AM »P4? Power 4
I'm not sure I understand and I fear I'm discovering something major. Are you saying that my 10 power reactor only recharge 2 power per 5 sec increment ??
That is exactly what he is saying. The "10" part tells you how much power the each of those weapons need to fire. The "2" part is how much they draw apiece. So anything more than 4 Power output is effectively wasted. The "10" is useful to let you know which weapons have priority, as in C# weapons are charged in order of most power needed to fire to least power needed to fire.
Posted by: vorpal+5
« on: December 27, 2020, 08:34:32 AM »P4? Power 4
I'm not sure I understand and I fear I'm discovering something major. Are you saying that my 10 power reactor only recharge 2 power per 5 sec increment ??
I'm not sure I understand and I fear I'm discovering something major. Are you saying that my 10 power reactor only recharge 2 power per 5 sec increment ??
Posted by: dr125
« on: December 27, 2020, 07:16:53 AM »
2 carronades, they can only fire alternatively given the reactor, I'm also ok with that.
PS: what is the meaning of "2" in 10-2 for the power usage of the carronade?
As above, that is your capacitor, 10 is the total to power, hence it needs 25 seconds to recharge (2 power recharge each 5 seconds). Speaking of which, you could get away with a P4 reactor, anything more than that is wasted per 5 seconds. Maybe more armor or 2 P4 reactors for redundancy?
Posted by: vorpal+5
« on: December 27, 2020, 07:14:20 AM »yes it is, but how it is relevant here, as capacitor alters ROF in any case? Just for reference?
Posted by: xenoscepter
« on: December 27, 2020, 06:37:42 AM »~snip~
PS: what is the meaning of "2" in 10-2 for the power usage of the carronade?
- I think that's your Capacitor tech... not 100% on that though, so don't quote me.
Posted by: vorpal+5
« on: December 27, 2020, 04:53:15 AM »This is a light combattant. Imp Nuclear Technology, should be faster hopefully than most enemy ships of equivalent propulsion level, at worse as it is tasked to be with missile ships, they might have blown an engine or two before contact is made with the enemy.
Low range, guzzle fuel like there is no tomorrow, I know that and I'm ok with that.
Armor seems decent but necessary for the approach phase.
2 carronades, they can only fire alternatively given the reactor, I'm also ok with that.
What do you think? Is it bound to fail because Carronades are too niche? I don't have Spinal lasers, if that's the question!
PS: what is the meaning of "2" in 10-2 for the power usage of the carronade?
Low range, guzzle fuel like there is no tomorrow, I know that and I'm ok with that.
Armor seems decent but necessary for the approach phase.
2 carronades, they can only fire alternatively given the reactor, I'm also ok with that.
What do you think? Is it bound to fail because Carronades are too niche? I don't have Spinal lasers, if that's the question!
Code: [Select]
Zhukov class Gunboat 3 000 tons 83 Crew 318.4 BP TCS 60 TH 224 EM 0
3734 km/s Armour 5-18 Shields 0-0 HTK 21 Sensors 0/0/0/0 DCR 1 PPV 12
Maint Life 3.28 Years MSP 146 AFR 72% IFR 1.0% 1YR 20 5YR 307 Max Repair 56.00 MSP
Commander Control Rating 1 BRG
Intended Deployment Time: 3 months Morale Check Required
Improved Nuclear Thermal Engine EP112.00 (2) Power 224.0 Fuel Use 324.10% Signature 112.00 Explosion 17%
Fuel Capacity 170 000 Litres Range 3.1 billion km (9 days at full power)
20 cm C2 Plasma Carronade (2) Range 40 000km TS: 3 734 km/s Power 10-2 RM 10 000 km ROF 25
Beam Fire Control R40-TS4000 (1) Max Range: 40 000 km TS: 4 000 km/s 75 50 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Improved Pressurised Water Reactor R10 (1) Total Power Output 10.2 Exp 5%
This design is classed as a Military Vessel for maintenance purposes
PS: what is the meaning of "2" in 10-2 for the power usage of the carronade?
Posted by: Migi
« on: November 13, 2020, 07:57:26 AM »Also the HQ is a static, because I lacked instant research pointsA static HQ will cost slightly more (in research and cost) than an equivalent infantry HQ.
On a light vehicle it will cost about twice as much.
For small HQ's that's probably not a problem but if you want a 500,000 ton HQ as a container for your divisions that's the difference between an HQ and having access to heavy AA twice over.
Mechanically I would say that HQ's should always be built with avoid combat, but if you are RPing things you might not want that for front line HQ's.
Posted by: Droll
« on: November 09, 2020, 07:22:48 PM »I kinda wish we were allowed to customize officer rank ratios since at this level you are going to have problem with having enough of certain ranks.
What do you mean you don't have 500 military academies?
You know if it weren't for the commandant system that would be a reasonable expectation.
Except the amount of time it takes the commander menu to open when you have a total 3000 officers across all branches
Posted by: Ektor
« on: November 09, 2020, 06:55:49 PM »I kinda wish we were allowed to customize officer rank ratios since at this level you are going to have problem with having enough of certain ranks.
What do you mean you don't have 500 military academies?
Posted by: MotoEverett
« on: November 09, 2020, 02:37:18 PM »That is what sm is for, adding officers, you can just delete excess naval, admin, and scientists
Posted by: Droll
« on: November 09, 2020, 02:30:20 PM »But one day I'll go down to fire teams and lance corporals in my ground OOB and up to Field Marshalls commanding Army Groups, and it shall be glorious!
I kinda wish we were allowed to customize officer rank ratios since at this level you are going to have problem with having enough of certain ranks.
Posted by: Garfunkel
« on: November 09, 2020, 01:20:30 PM »Yeah, I was going to go down that rabbit hole myself but since my main campaign is with 10 Earth powers plus a fluctuating number of alien powers, and with the limited support there currently is for complex OOBs, I decided not to go overboard. 
But one day I'll go down to fire teams and lance corporals in my ground OOB and up to Field Marshalls commanding Army Groups, and it shall be glorious!
But one day I'll go down to fire teams and lance corporals in my ground OOB and up to Field Marshalls commanding Army Groups, and it shall be glorious!
Posted by: Droll
« on: November 09, 2020, 12:42:19 PM »Make 2 different HQs and 2 layers of formations to begin with. It's what I'm doing in my 1890-campaign to maintain my sanity with 10 nations.
The basic building block is the battalion and each battalion is built to do one thing out of three:
1. Attack
2. Defence
3. Support
These also match with the positions (FA, -, SP) Aurora allows for ground combat.
Attack (Cavalry) battalion has LVH HQ and a whole bunch of LVHs armed with CAP and LAV.
Defence (Infantry) battalion has STA HQ and a whole bunch of INF armed with PW & CAP & LB plus some STA with MAV.
Support (Artillery) battalion has STA HQ and loads of STA with MB.
Then I make a Regiment that's only a big STA HQ - but eventually, I will put HB or LrB on it as well so it can fire from Rear position.
Now the Regiment will have 4 battalions under its command: 1x Attack, 1x Defence, 2x Support. Once I have HB in the Regiment itself, I'll take the second Support battalion away.
This way each regiment is a self-contained fighting unit and you can just add more regiments as needed for an invasion. Attack battalions are on Frontline Attack, Defence battalions are on Frontline Defence, Support battalions are on Support and the Regiment itself is on Rear. This way all units maximize their usefulness vis-a-vis fortifications, breakthroughs, evasion, and supporting bombardment fire.
Once your empire grows, you could switch from battalions to regiments as your basic building block to avoid micromanagement hell.
On the other hand you can be like me and willfully go insane and build a full command hierarchy down to company level. Commander bonus are supposed (eventually not right now IIRC) to stack and propagate down the hierarchy so I've decided to practice big OOBs.
Or you can go beyond insane and into lunacy by modelling your hierarchy down to individual squads being led by sergeants.
For reference my OOB generalized looks something like this:
Division
4 - 6 brigades
3 regiments per brigade
3 battalions per regiment
4 companies + 3000 tons of auxiliary formations (I do have some "double" sized companies though)
This is one of the reason why I have supported and made suggestions on the suggestion board in order to allow for the creation of OOB templates in order to make it so that I only have to form a division type once, then I could just train it. As it stands it can take hours to set up a deep hierarchy.
