Posted by: Micro102
« on: February 10, 2010, 10:36:57 PM »Ah, now i get it, thx.
Hmmm, thinking it over, focusing on the times instead of the points was probably the wrong idea. (and i thought i was smart spamming 10 research to be done in 5 years )
So, putting all research labs into one project is the best way to go?
Now hold on, if you have 2 50 year research projects, and add an extra lab to one of them, it could go down by like, 10 years, add another and then it goes down by 9, then 8 then 7 then 6 until it only goes down by a couple of months whenever you add a new research lab.
So wouldn't it be better, if you only had 4 labs, to put one on each of them, removing 10 years form each, leading to 20 years shorter, instead of putting 2 of them on 1 research project, and only removing a total of 19 years?
From watching the way the research points work, I've come to think that the best way to research is to assign a project to every scientist you have, even if you have 30 of them, and then give the extra labs to the ones with the longest research time. This could lead to several extremely long research periods, but in the end it is faster then pouring everything into a couple of researches at a time.
Can someone confirm this?