Posted by: UnLimiTeD
« on: September 06, 2010, 07:07:11 PM »I never stop learning.
Posted by: Steve Walmsley
« on: September 06, 2010, 05:47:14 PM »Quote from: "UnLimiTeD"
Man, I wish crew grade would influence engineeringIt does. The chance of system failure is reduced by the crew grade.
Steve
Posted by: UnLimiTeD
« on: September 04, 2010, 04:19:00 PM »Which stack in addition if I remember right.
Having a 50% gauss, and a 20% crew bonus, seems to result in 70%.
And having -50% by eccm results in never hitting ^^.
Man, I wish crew grade would influence engineering
Having a 50% gauss, and a 20% crew bonus, seems to result in 70%.
And having -50% by eccm results in never hitting ^^.
Man, I wish crew grade would influence engineering
Posted by: Vanigo
« on: September 04, 2010, 02:29:00 PM »Quote from: "zkline"
Hi,You're correct on the first, but TF training is what impacts crew response time. Grade points affect the chance to hit with weapons, mostly.
Those more experienced than I can correct me if I'm wrong, but I suspect the failure rate is related to the clock, not the grade points.
Grade points impact crew response time.
Posted by: Caplin
« on: September 04, 2010, 12:30:10 PM »Hi,
Those more experienced than I can correct me if I'm wrong, but I suspect the failure rate is related to the clock, not the grade points.
Grade points impact crew response time.
Those more experienced than I can correct me if I'm wrong, but I suspect the failure rate is related to the clock, not the grade points.
Grade points impact crew response time.
Posted by: martinuzz
« on: September 04, 2010, 04:05:11 AM »I noticed in the individual ship screen, that a ship, of which the design has a 57% annual failure rate, has a 0% annual failure rate.
It has a 2000 grade point crew.
Is it because of the crew that it's AFR is that good, or is it because it has no years on it's maintenance clock?
It has a 2000 grade point crew.
Is it because of the crew that it's AFR is that good, or is it because it has no years on it's maintenance clock?
