Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Bold Italicized Underline Strikethrough Search the Wikipedia knowledge base | Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
Insert Image Insert Hyperlink Insert Email Insert FTP Link | Glow Shadow Marquee | Superscript Subscript Teletype | Insert Table Insert Code Insert Quote | Insert Unordered List Insert Ordered List Horizontal Rule Spoiler Off-Topic Embed a youtube video url Embed a vimeo video url | Remove Formatting Toggle View
Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips sealed Undecided Kiss Cry

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Please read the rules before you post!


Topic Summary

Posted by: Shaitan
« on: December 11, 2012, 01:27:50 PM »

Quote from: orfeusz on December 11, 2012, 12:56:04 PM
It depends but generally YES.

They have bonus to armor and better firing rate for missile launchers.

Note that the better firing rate for missile launchers requires PDC specific missile launchers to be researched.
Posted by: orfeusz
« on: December 11, 2012, 12:56:04 PM »

It depends but generally YES.

They have bonus to armor and better firing rate for missile launchers.
Posted by: coco146
« on: December 11, 2012, 12:40:45 AM »

So PDCs armed with misiles better for defence?
Posted by: madpraxis
« on: December 10, 2012, 05:40:25 PM »

Ok, are you building orbital defense stations or are you building PDC's? Because you seem to be swapping those two terms around like they mean the same thing.
Something in orbit wouldn't have any limitations on it's weapons.
Something in a PDC does, unless you are building it on a zero atmosphere body, since the more atmosphere you have, the more interference you get.
A orbital defense station would be a engine-less (at least in my mind) space station with lots of pew pew's on it.
A PDC is a large armoured base dug into the ground of whatever body it is built (or assembled) on.
Posted by: Conscript Gary
« on: December 10, 2012, 03:01:34 PM »

Correct, beam weapons and atmospheres do not get along with the exception of mesons.
I personally wouldn't bother with an anti-ship beam orbital base unless you expect to have to take out ships sitting literally on top of your world, and once you've reached that point you have other problems.
Posted by: coco146
« on: December 10, 2012, 02:06:32 PM »

Sorry I was talking about using gauss fot pd the particle beams are purely anti-ship, and as for having then on PDCs doesn't that reduce their effectiveness?
Posted by: Traveler
« on: December 10, 2012, 01:20:35 PM »

If you already have the missiles, launchers, mags and FC designed, why not include them with the beam PD on the same PDC?
Posted by: coco146
« on: December 10, 2012, 12:31:43 PM »

I am planning on building some orbital defence stations, the only weapons that were researched were particle beams and gauss cannons.  I want to build several simple stations with only a few particle beams, but should I give those stations anti-misile capabilty?  Or should that be on seperate facility?