Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Please read the rules before you post!


Topic Summary

Posted by: Paul M
« on: July 10, 2013, 04:20:03 AM »

Alex,  my feeling is that it is...but on the other hand I've had variable times even surveying asteroids, and moons.  It took several months to survey hestia for example.  This could be related to my not wonderful survey score...I think it is like 85-95 or so.  I have found it extremely variable is all I can say.  But my overall impression has been the smaller the body the faster the survey.
Posted by: alex_brunius
« on: July 10, 2013, 03:29:54 AM »

The only thing is that the time required to do the ground survey is extremely variable so you often need patience.  Or perhaps much better survey people then I have.  But I've got a serious officer shortage at the moment. 
Isn't the time required for a survey (both ground and space) directly linked to planet/moon/asteroid size?
Posted by: Paul M
« on: July 10, 2013, 03:23:18 AM »

A ground survey can always find either more minerals or different minerals or a different (higher) abundence of the minerals.

It is never a bad idea to do a ground survey.  I don't notice that the ground survey team often finds minerals that a space survey missed (so usually they find nothing) but from time to time they strike it big.  The only thing is that the time required to do the ground survey is extremely variable so you often need patience.  Or perhaps much better survey people then I have.  But I've got a serious officer shortage at the moment. 
Posted by: Saibot
« on: July 10, 2013, 03:02:46 AM »

If the ship survey turns up no minerals, that means there's no minerals, or could a ground survey possibly find some?