Posted by: kdstubbs
« on: December 30, 2007, 12:20:32 PM »Steve,
Its more difficult to destroy a shipyard than your projecting. I would ask that you look at the experience of the USN at Pearl Harbor in 1941--granted no one was using Nuclear Weapons--however, my point is this. If the slipway has a ship in the way, then the damage was predominately absorbed by that ship, instead of the slipway. So you might want to rethink the equation to take into account ships undergoing refit, or partially constructed ships--their armor packages would absorb some of the hit points.
Not a big deal but thought you might want to consider the ships that might be in the slipways.
Kevin
Its more difficult to destroy a shipyard than your projecting. I would ask that you look at the experience of the USN at Pearl Harbor in 1941--granted no one was using Nuclear Weapons--however, my point is this. If the slipway has a ship in the way, then the damage was predominately absorbed by that ship, instead of the slipway. So you might want to rethink the equation to take into account ships undergoing refit, or partially constructed ships--their armor packages would absorb some of the hit points.
Not a big deal but thought you might want to consider the ships that might be in the slipways.
Kevin