Posted by: TMaekler
« on: February 10, 2016, 03:20:44 PM »Ok, thanks. Good to know 
Posted by: metalax
« on: February 10, 2016, 12:10:39 PM »You would use less fuel per increment, but you would cover a correspondingly shorter distance, so the maximum range of the ship will remain unchanged.
To use your example, you would travel at half the speed and consume half the fuel, but would cover half the distance. The end result would be that you simply doubled the time for your ship to make the journey, consuming the same total fuel.
The actual benefit of reducing your ship's speed is that you reduce the thermal signature of your ship, rendering it harder to detect by thermal scanners.
To use your example, you would travel at half the speed and consume half the fuel, but would cover half the distance. The end result would be that you simply doubled the time for your ship to make the journey, consuming the same total fuel.
The actual benefit of reducing your ship's speed is that you reduce the thermal signature of your ship, rendering it harder to detect by thermal scanners.
Posted by: TMaekler
« on: February 10, 2016, 12:00:19 PM »Hello there,
there are quite some options to design engines with a huge difference in fuel consumption. But I was wondering how fuel consumption changes if I have lets say a ship which can travel at 5.000 km/s and I set it to travel at max 2.500 km/s. How does the consumption of fuel change in that moment? Can I travel farther or would the maximum range not change?
there are quite some options to design engines with a huge difference in fuel consumption. But I was wondering how fuel consumption changes if I have lets say a ship which can travel at 5.000 km/s and I set it to travel at max 2.500 km/s. How does the consumption of fuel change in that moment? Can I travel farther or would the maximum range not change?
