Author Topic: Oh, the Humanity: Designs 1.13 edition  (Read 1378 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jorgen_CAB

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • J
  • Posts: 2470
  • Thanked: 487 times
Re: Oh, the Humanity: Designs 1.13 edition
« Reply #15 on: October 13, 2021, 08:11:14 AM »
The point of them is to never be detected or if they are not be a good target as that will reveal the enemy for a low value target.
Most of my frigates are not super fast either, usually slower than most destroyers, their protection in generally not being detected or being a low value target or protected by other military assets that will be nearby anyway.
What would be your thoughts on armour rating 1 for such a ship then?

Quote
Larger ships just are that much more effective. The only drawback is slower construction and bigger thermal signature. But the efficient use of officers and bridge officers just make larger ships so much more effective. Not to mention efficiency of components. The idea is that if I always deploy a ship types in three or bigger squadrons than three in any mission I might as well combine them into one larger ship. If I need more scouts I just build dedicated scout craft and put them in a hangar on said ship as smaller sensors are way more efficient than large sensors anyway.
But I also understand that not everyone are as patient as me about how to conduct missions, for me that is part of the fun role-play aspect of the game.
I often think that if a ship has multiple FCS, then I should spread them across multiple ships instead. Each ship is a different target and thus more ships allow to distribute the offensive power. Which should be a good strategy dealing with high penetration, low ROF weapons like lances.

It is important to note when discussing ship sizes and detection that it is very rare to see sensor resolutions larger than 100 to 120 (5,000 to 6,000 tons) at least from NPR designs. Against player races a ship size of 6,000 tons may prove harder to detect but against NPRs it does not make any real difference if a ship is 6,000 or 60,000 tons - unless of course you are using cloaking devices. Usually for a larger ship class, 3,000 to 4,000 tons works well to avoid the largest NPR sensors. NPRs usually deploy a wide range of sensor resolutions so there is not too much reason to go smaller than this as you will not beat the lower-resolution sensors anyways.
Yes, I was mainly talking about thermal signature from the engines of smaller size. But you are absolutely right about sensor resolution! In my older games I frequently used 8Kt sensors, but NPRs in C# seem to be sticking to res 100/120 tops. Thanks for noting that!

Quote
It is worth noting that Gauss cannons in almost all circumstances, other than point defense and some edge cases involving SW fire controls, will have inferior performance to 10cm railguns in terms of DPS (really DPS per ton to be precise). They are really not a good weapon to use for antiship work, they can be effective but rarely if ever as effective as any other option (except mesons, which are even worse).
I found GC is a better light-weight option for small fighters in terms of tonnage, since they do not require a reactor. But I have not tried new reduced shot railguns yet, since my experience with them goes back to VB6 Aurora. Also...I am wondering what is the max researchable range for 10-12cm railgun in C# Aurora 1.13?

Armour levels depend entirely on technology level and the role of the ship.. I would never deploy a ship with only a single level of armor that has a beam weapon meant for at least some form of close combat or any military ship that is not a fighter or missile boat for that matter, that is just a personal preference.

It also make very little sense to split a ship for having multiple fire-controls... keeping it all on one ship is way more efficient even if you have several fire-controls. You get better captains and bridge officers, more efficient components and the ships are way harder to destroy. It also make sense from a backup point of view. The only real drawback is thermal signature and the fact they take longer to build.

If you make a small combat ship make it for the reason it is small, not as a main combat ship because it is effective. You keep the ship small for scouting reasons not combat reasons, for being able to deploy them on singular missions or in smaller numbers. A larger ship with onboard small scouts actually often are stealthier than a bunch of smaller ships, you don't want the ship itself to be the one that contact the enemy, you want the option to decide if you want to engage or not. A larger ship is always more efficient and resilient when you do engage, that is just pure math.

It is just fine to justify any design or ship based on role-play factors, because there can be a reason from a political point of view you deploy ship of a certain size. Similar to the split between light and heavy cruisers and bigger ships during World War II which were a product of treaties.

In terms of Railguns they are way more efficient on a fighter or FAC hull than Gauss cannons even when counting the power generators, that is also just pure math. The Gauss cannon might get better if it fires like six or more shots or, it where some time ago I did the math on that. A quick look is a 10cm Railgun with a Powerplant that fires every five seconds weigh around 190t and cost about 20 production while a similar Gauss cannon weigh 300t and cost about 50 production, both fires four shots. The smaller rail-gun can comfortably be put into a fighter hull of 500t but you would need to make the Gauss a bit smaller which reduce their effectiveness From a research perspective there really is no good argument not to invest in the lower end of Railguns for general point defence.

Gauss weapons do not work well with fighter hulls in my opinion, you are better off with a railgun for PD fighters if you use them. Gauss should always be mounted in a turret to be effective.
« Last Edit: Today at 03:12:38 AM by Jorgen_CAB »
 

Offline nuclearslurpee

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 1412
  • Thanked: 927 times
  • Radioactive frozen beverage.
Re: Oh, the Humanity: Designs 1.13 edition
« Reply #16 on: October 13, 2021, 09:11:02 AM »
I found GC is a better light-weight option for small fighters in terms of tonnage, since they do not require a reactor. But I have not tried new reduced shot railguns yet, since my experience with them goes back to VB6 Aurora. Also...I am wondering what is the max researchable range for 10-12cm railgun in C# Aurora 1.13?

I've done the math a number of times on this forum and it always comes out that a 10cm railgun is far more tonnage-efficient than a Gauss cannon for fighters until you reach endgame levels of Gauss ROF technology.

Keep in mind, a full-size Gauss cannon is 6 HS (300 tons), and any reduced-size Gauss cannon loses accuracy in proportion to its size so that damage per ton remains a constant. You might think "oh, I can put a 1 HS Gauss cannon on my small fighter but not a 3 HS railgun" but the 1 HS Gauss cannon is only 17% as accurate as the railgun.

A 10cm railgun is always 3 HS, so with the exception of very low tech levels (when you shouldn't be building fighters anyways as they are woefully ineffective) railgun + power plant is always lighter than an equivalent-DPS Gauss cannon until very high tech levels. Gauss cannons really do not break even until ROF 8 tech - in theory ROF 6 tech would work but by the time you are that high in the tech tree you can also build a R3 reactor very small and cheaply so Gauss is still not quite good enough.

It turns out that the 150 ton size of a 10cm railgun is about optimal for fighters as you can build up to the full 500 tons and get a very comfortable design which is the most efficient. With fighters, always keep in mind that bigger is usually better as the size efficiency of various components is most pronounced for smaller sizes. For example, a 500-ton fighter will get better use out of a given BFC than two 250-ton fighters would get out of two BFCs which are half the size each.

I believe the maximum railgun range modifier is 90,000, which gives 90,000 km range for 10cm and 180,000 km range for 12cm at max tech. This is quite short (compared to lasers easily exceeding 1.4m km at max tech) but still longer-ranged than Gauss which I believe caps out at 60,000 km.
 

Online L0ckAndL0ad (OP)

  • Lieutenant
  • *******
  • L
  • Posts: 158
  • Thanked: 33 times
Re: Oh, the Humanity: Designs 1.13 edition
« Reply #17 on: October 14, 2021, 03:26:41 AM »
Like I've already said, I first got into Gauss Cannon fighters when playing VB6 Aurora. With low % GCs, I was able to make a fighter that was smaller and faster than the railgun one, and also utilized crew grade and pilot's skills, thus improving the degraded hit-chance and making it better than it was on paper. It was cheaper, smaller, faster and more reliable (because no reactor needed). Yeah, the reduced GC's performance obviously could not compete with railgun 1:1, but it was "good enough" for me, granted the crew grade and skilled pilots were there. I really wanted the smallest possible fighter, to fill as many of them on a carrier.

Also, against missiles, the faster fighter has better chances dealing with them due to tracking speed, but of course it is a matter of how much the difference is. And don't forget about Research investment. In my current playthrough, I researched lasers, GCs and missiles almost exclusively until late 2090s. Railguns is another tech you need to research, if you don't use them for anything else.

Sadly, there's a bug in 1.13 Aurora where commander's bonuses don't apply on craft without a bridge, so you can't utilize the GC fighter potential fully as I envision it.

I did look into reduced size railguns and they seem to be awesome. They become less space efficient with reduced shots, but still, it's a good option to have.
 

Online L0ckAndL0ad (OP)

  • Lieutenant
  • *******
  • L
  • Posts: 158
  • Thanked: 33 times
Re: Oh, the Humanity: Designs 1.13 edition
« Reply #18 on: Yesterday at 01:38:38 PM »
2nd Generation major combat vessels

Surigao is the result of previous drafts I made public here but never built. 4 ships of the class were constructed so far, although the initial designs had 500t of hangar space for scouts and size 6 missile cells. Recent combat made me question the potency of size 6 missiles against heavily armored ships, which resulted in size 20 wh 65 missiles, which should allow for occasional internal shock damage, even if they fail to penetrate the armor.

This probably would be the last of the laser weapon armed designs, as I see clearly that str 18 particle lance is far superior choice when you want to kill heavily armored ships. My current enemy uses them on pretty much every ship - DD, CA, BC. I think I'm gonna do the same when I research all the needed tech.

Troop Capacity was probably a bad idea because my experience with boarding so far wasn't that positive. Oh, and the construction of carriers made me shift all the scouting craft there.

Code: [Select]
Surigao class Battleship      35 190 tons       829 Crew       8 298 BP       TCS 704    TH 4 400    EM 3 570
6251 km/s      Armour 18-95       Shields 119-476       HTK 193      Sensors 36/18/0/0      DCR 37      PPV 196
Maint Life 2.54 Years     MSP 7 105    AFR 583%    IFR 8.1%    1YR 1 533    5YR 22 996    Max Repair 550 MSP
Troop Capacity 250 tons     Boarding Capable    Magazine 440   
Captain    Control Rating 4   BRG   AUX   ENG   CIC   
Intended Deployment Time: 12 months    Morale Check Required   

Internal Fusion Drive  EP1100.00 (EP110/FC0.4) (4)    Power 4400    Fuel Use 22.70%    Signature 1100    Explosion 11%
Fuel Capacity 1 710 000 Litres    Range 38.5 billion km (71 days at full power)
Epsilon S119 / R476 Shields (1)     Recharge Time 476 seconds (0.3 per second)

400mm SXR Laser (10)    Range 384 000km     TS: 6 251 km/s     Power 42-6     RM 60 000 km    ROF 35       
Gunnery FCS R384-T6 (2)     Max Range: 384 000 km   TS: 6 250 km/s     97 95 92 90 87 84 82 79 77 74
Magnetic Confinement Fusion Reactor R6 (10)     Total Power Output 61.1    Exp 5%

MSL-20B Missile Cell (22)     Missile Size: 20    Hangar Reload 223 minutes    MF Reload 37 hours
Mk 6 Missile FCS (11)     Range 59.6m km    Resolution 100
ASM-200 Demiurge Anti-Ship Missile (22)    Speed: 40 200 km/s    End: 2.2m     Range: 5.4m km    WH: 65    Size: 20    TH: 214/128/64

ASR-6LR 6K Search Radar (1)     GPS 8640     Range 100.2m km    Resolution 120
EM Sensor EM1.0-18.0 (1)     Sensitivity 18     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  33.5m km
Thermal Sensor TH2-36 (1)     Sensitivity 36     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  47.4m km

ECCM-4 (1)         ECM 40

Command, Control, Intelligence and Jump capability version of Surigao class battleship allows to put everything you may need on a flagship into a single hull, enabling it to lead other battleships in JP assaults. 2 ships built so far. Requires a dedicated shipyard and cannot be built on the same yard as the main line Surigao, unfortunately.

Code: [Select]
Surigao C2IJ class Battleship      35 194 tons       891 Crew       8 115.1 BP       TCS 704    TH 4 400    EM 3 570
6251 km/s    JR 6-750      Armour 18-95       Shields 119-476       HTK 180      Sensors 36/14/0/0      DCR 48      PPV 70
Maint Life 2.36 Years     MSP 6 735    AFR 354%    IFR 4.9%    1YR 1 650    5YR 24 756    Max Repair 1181.5 MSP
Troop Capacity 250 tons     Boarding Capable    Magazine 120   
Captain    Control Rating 5   BRG   AUX   ENG   CIC   FLG   
Intended Deployment Time: 12 months    Morale Check Required   

J35K (E10-6-750) Military Jump Drive     Max Ship Size 35250 tons    Distance 750k km     Squadron Size 6

Internal Fusion Drive  EP1100.00 (EP110/FC0.4) (4)    Power 4400    Fuel Use 22.70%    Signature 1100    Explosion 11%
Fuel Capacity 1 710 000 Litres    Range 38.5 billion km (71 days at full power)
Epsilon S119 / R476 Shields (1)     Recharge Time 476 seconds (0.3 per second)

400mm SXR Laser (4)    Range 384 000km     TS: 6 251 km/s     Power 42-6     RM 60 000 km    ROF 35       
Gunnery FCS R384-T6 (1)     Max Range: 384 000 km   TS: 6 250 km/s     97 95 92 90 87 84 82 79 77 74
Magnetic Confinement Fusion Reactor R6 (4)     Total Power Output 24.4    Exp 5%

MSL-20B Missile Cell (6)     Missile Size: 20    Hangar Reload 223 minutes    MF Reload 37 hours
Mk 6 Missile FCS (3)     Range 59.6m km    Resolution 100
ASM-200 Demiurge Anti-Ship Missile (6)    Speed: 40 200 km/s    End: 2.2m     Range: 5.4m km    WH: 65    Size: 20    TH: 214/128/64

ASR-6LR 6K Search Radar (1)     GPS 8640     Range 100.2m km    Resolution 120
Thermal Sensor TH2-36 (1)     Sensitivity 36     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  47.4m km
ELINT Module (1)     Sensitivity 14     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  29.6m km

ECCM-4 (1)         ECM 40

Coral Sea is the carrier I was able to build as quickly as possible. The size of the naval yards and the presence of Jump Drive were limiting factors. The preferable 100k+ ton carriers would have to come later, and the JD capability is something I think is crucial and will stay no matter what. Everything else, even CIWS and passive sensors that I usually put on carriers, were gotten rid of in favor of more hangar space, supplies and fuel.

The ship has enough ammo and fuel for 3 full strikes, for a total of 4, if we include the armament that LACs have on board when they embark. Strike wing consists of 30x 350t LACs (carrying 1x ASM-200 Demiurge each), 6x railgun fighters (not that tactically relevant in current conditions), 6x Early Warning craft, 2x JP scouts and 3x rescue shuttles.  4 carriers were built so far.

Code: [Select]
Coral Sea class Carrier      60 000 tons       1 189 Crew       9 254.7 BP       TCS 1 200    TH 7 200    EM 0
6000 km/s    JR 3-50      Armour 1-136       Shields 0-0       HTK 310      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 75      PPV 0
Maint Life 2.48 Years     MSP 7 957    AFR 524%    IFR 7.3%    1YR 1 796    5YR 26 944    Max Repair 1381.9 MSP
Hangar Deck Capacity 17 000 tons     Troop Capacity 250 tons     Magazine 2 208   
Captain    Control Rating 4   BRG   AUX   ENG   PFC   
Intended Deployment Time: 24 months    Flight Crew Berths 340    Morale Check Required   

J60K (E10-3-50) Military Jump Drive     Max Ship Size 60000 tons    Distance 50k km     Squadron Size 3

Internal Fusion Drive  EP1200.00 (EP120/FC0.4) (6)    Power 7200    Fuel Use 28.22%    Signature 1200    Explosion 12%
Fuel Capacity 6 150 000 Litres    Range 65.4 billion km (126 days at full power)

ASM-200 Demiurge Anti-Ship Missile (110)    Speed: 40 200 km/s    End: 2.2m     Range: 5.4m km    WH: 65    Size: 20    TH: 214/128/64

ECM 40

Strike Group
6x F-2A Retribution Fighter   Speed: 25040 km/s    Size: 9.58
6x E-1 Watcher Early Warning Craft   Speed: 14418 km/s    Size: 9.99
3x H-1 Sotiris Rescue Shuttle   Speed: 12073 km/s    Size: 2.48
2x SJ-2 Torchbearer Jump Scout   Speed: 12073 km/s    Size: 2.48
30x A-2A Absolution Light Attack Craft   Speed: 17171 km/s    Size: 6.99

Dragon class was something I always wanted to build, but wasn't brave enough to do so. I've built 9 of them so far, and the reality is that fiddling with their FCS assignments is MUCH harder than it is for ordinary, reloadable missile launcher designs. The idea was that I could use size 1 light attack missiles (currently with wh 2) against fighters and ships if there's a need to do so. Which is a good idea, considering that my current enemy does NOT have missile capabilities whatsoever.

But this design would make you a lot of trouble when dealing against fighters... removing/adding missile cells to target different small targets for each ship is too time consuming. So I'd rather switch to some other missile design very soon.

Code: [Select]
Dragon class Destroyer      9 000 tons       180 Crew       1 832.3 BP       TCS 180    TH 1 200    EM 1 170
6666 km/s      Armour 3-38       Shields 39-325       HTK 54      Sensors 9/9/0/0      DCR 14      PPV 62.26
Maint Life 3.80 Years     MSP 1 508    AFR 162%    IFR 2.2%    1YR 164    5YR 2 458    Max Repair 300 MSP
Magazine 310   
Captain    Control Rating 3   BRG   AUX   CIC   
Intended Deployment Time: 24 months    Morale Check Required   

Internal Fusion Drive  EP600.00 (EP120/FC0.4) (2)    Power 1200    Fuel Use 39.91%    Signature 600    Explosion 12%
Fuel Capacity 475 000 Litres    Range 23.8 billion km (41 days at full power)
Epsilon S39 / R325 Shields (1)     Recharge Time 325 seconds (0.1 per second)

Mk 45 Gauss Cannon (4x5)    Range 50 000km     TS: 25000 km/s     Power 0-0     RM 50 000 km    ROF 5       
Gunnery FCS R67-T25 (1)     Max Range: 67 200 km   TS: 25 000 km/s     85 70 55 40 26 11 0 0 0 0

MSL-1B Missile Cell (150)     Missile Size: 1    Hangar Reload 50 minutes    MF Reload 8 hours
MSL-20B Missile Cell (8)     Missile Size: 20    Hangar Reload 223 minutes    MF Reload 37 hours
Mk 6 Missile FCS (4)     Range 59.6m km    Resolution 100
MD-6 Missile FCS (3)     Range 20.3m km    Resolution 1
AMM-11 Iris Interceptor Missile (50)    Speed: 64 800 km/s    End: 0.5m     Range: 1.8m km    WH: 1    Size: 1    TH: 669/401/200
ASM-10 Tulip Light Attack Missile (100)    Speed: 29 600 km/s    End: 11.3m     Range: 20.1m km    WH: 2    Size: 1    TH: 276/165/82
ASM-200 Demiurge Anti-Ship Missile (8)    Speed: 40 200 km/s    End: 2.2m     Range: 5.4m km    WH: 65    Size: 20    TH: 214/128/64

ASR-6 6K Search Radar (1)     GPS 2160     Range 50.1m km    Resolution 120
MDR-6M Missile Defense Radar (1)     GPS 72     Range 20.3m km    MCR 1.8m km    Resolution 1
Thermal Sensor TH0.5-9.0 (1)     Sensitivity 9     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  23.7m km
EM Sensor EM0.5-9.0 (1)     Sensitivity 9     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  23.7m km

Compact ECCM-3 (2)         ECM 40

Initially, Kotlin was a pure RP design which I came up with after re-reading one of my favorite sci-fi books, where a group of such frigates makes a daring attack against superior foe near Jupiter. It had small PD cannons and size 6 missile cells. As I later begun experimenting with bigger missiles, and my enemy has no missile capability of his own yet, two new size 20 cells were installed instead and more speed and supplies were provided.

8 ships constructed so far. I see them being useful in the future, but I kinda hate having so many different ship designs and would rather install a big beam weapon with SW BFC on destroyers instead in the future.

Code: [Select]
Kotlin class Frigate      6 000 tons       178 Crew       1 545.4 BP       TCS 120    TH 1 200    EM 1 170
10000 km/s      Armour 2-29       Shields 39-325       HTK 44      Sensors 9/9/0/0      DCR 2      PPV 22
Maint Life 3.09 Years     MSP 1 287    AFR 115%    IFR 1.6%    1YR 202    5YR 3 037    Max Repair 300 MSP
Magazine 40   
Captain    Control Rating 3   BRG   AUX   CIC   
Intended Deployment Time: 12 months    Morale Check Required   

Internal Fusion Drive  EP600.00 (EP120/FC0.4) (2)    Power 1200    Fuel Use 39.91%    Signature 600    Explosion 12%
Fuel Capacity 270 000 Litres    Range 20.3 billion km (23 days at full power)
Epsilon S39 / R325 Shields (1)     Recharge Time 325 seconds (0.1 per second)

500mm SXR Spinal Laser (1)    Range 384 000km     TS: 10 000 km/s     Power 65-6     RM 60 000 km    ROF 55       
Gunnery FCS R384-T10 (SW) (1)     Max Range: 384 000 km   TS: 10 000 km/s     97 95 92 90 87 84 82 79 77 74
Magnetic Confinement Fusion Reactor R6 (1)     Total Power Output 6.1    Exp 5%

MSL-20B Missile Cell (2)     Missile Size: 20    Hangar Reload 223 minutes    MF Reload 37 hours
Mk 6 Missile FCS (2)     Range 59.6m km    Resolution 100
ASM-200 Demiurge Anti-Ship Missile (2)    Speed: 40 200 km/s    End: 2.2m     Range: 5.4m km    WH: 65    Size: 20    TH: 214/128/64

ASR-6 6K Search Radar (1)     GPS 2160     Range 50.1m km    Resolution 120
Thermal Sensor TH0.5-9.0 (1)     Sensitivity 9     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  23.7m km
EM Sensor EM0.5-9.0 (1)     Sensitivity 9     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  23.7m km

Compact ECCM-3 (1)         ECM 40
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 01:48:45 PM by L0ckAndL0ad »
 

Online L0ckAndL0ad (OP)

  • Lieutenant
  • *******
  • L
  • Posts: 158
  • Thanked: 33 times
Re: Oh, the Humanity: Designs 1.13 edition
« Reply #19 on: Yesterday at 02:21:29 PM »
2nd Generation small craft and ammo

My usual go-to is Size 4 or 6 ASM. This time I tried using ECM and it's doing great so far. It fits okay at current tech level, but also fitting ECCM feels not worth it.

Since the damage against heavily armored targets is not that great, I'm trying to switch to Size 20 ASMs.. They should provide internal shock damage capability but would require bigger volleys to deal with heavy PD/AMMs. Thankfully, my current enemy does not use AMMs yet, only GC PD.

Code: [Select]
ASM-62 Spike Anti-Ship Missile
Missile Size: 6.0000 MSP  (15.00000 Tons)     Warhead: 12    Radiation Damage: 12    Manoeuvre Rating: 15
Speed: 40 467 km/s     Fuel: 1 305     Flight Time: 21 minutes     Range: 50.07m km
ECM Modifier: 40%     
Cost Per Missile: 11.61032     Development Cost: 1 161
Chance to Hit: 1k km/s 607.0%   3k km/s 202.3%   5k km/s 121.4%   10k km/s 60.7%

Materials Required
Corbomite  2
Tritanium  3
Gallicite  6.61032
Fuel:  1305

Code: [Select]
ASM-200 Demiurge Anti-Ship Missile
Missile Size: 20.00 MSP  (50.000 Tons)     Warhead: 65    Radiation Damage: 65    Manoeuvre Rating: 16
Speed: 40 200 km/s     Fuel: 1 450     Flight Time: 2 minutes     Range: 5.42m km
ECM Modifier: 40%     ECCM Modifier: 40%
Cost Per Missile: 42.568     Development Cost: 4 257
Chance to Hit: 1k km/s 643.2%   3k km/s 214.4%   5k km/s 128.6%   10k km/s 64.3%

Materials Required
Corbomite  4
Tritanium  16.26
Gallicite  22.308
Fuel:  1450

I came back from GC fighters to Railgun ones. I compared both closely and Railguns are far superior, of course. I do see a need to make the engine smaller to be able to fit more fighters on carriers. Lower speed would hurt, but I feel like I need more numbers to be able to rotate individual sorties more efficiently. It's there mostly for a small chance that I may encounter missiles or enemy fighters/FACs at some point, so I do not worry much about it.

Code: [Select]
F-2A Retribution class Fighter      480 tons       24 Crew       206.4 BP       TCS 10    TH 240    EM 0
25040 km/s      Armour 1-5       Shields 0-0       HTK 3      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 0      PPV 3
Maint Life 0 Years     MSP 0    AFR 95%    IFR 1.3%    1YR 42    5YR 627    Max Repair 120 MSP
Lieutenant Commander    Control Rating 1   
Intended Deployment Time: 6 days    Morale Check Required   

Internal Fusion Drive  EP240.00 (1)    Power 240    Fuel Use 985.90%    Signature 240    Explosion 30%
Fuel Capacity 34 000 Litres    Range 1.3 billion km (14 hours at full power)

10cm Railgun V50/C3 (1x4)    Range 50 000km     TS: 25 040 km/s     Power 3-3     RM 50 000 km    ROF 5       
Beam Fire Control R58-TS25000 (SW) (1)     Max Range: 57 600 km   TS: 25 000 km/s     83 65 48 31 13 0 0 0 0 0
Magnetic Confinement Fusion Reactor R3 (1)     Total Power Output 3    Exp 5%

Active Search Sensor AS4-R1 (1)     GPS 4     Range 4.5m km    MCR 408.7k km    Resolution 1

Absolution is basically a torpedo bomber. It's slow for its tech level, but can carry a big missile. A bigger craft of 500t will probably be unable to carry two such missiles at good speed, so making this LAC small and slow allows for larger volley size. Turnaround time is important, but delivering payload is what matters the most. As the enemy has no missiles, the ASM is short ranged, but the MFCS and radar allows longer range engagement if another missile would be introduced. Small craft ECM is included, which is also nice.

Code: [Select]
A-2A Absolution class Light Attack Craft      350 tons       7 Crew       106.3 BP       TCS 7    TH 120    EM 0
17171 km/s      Armour 1-4       Shields 0-0       HTK 3      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 0      PPV 3
Maint Life 0 Years     MSP 0    AFR 69%    IFR 1.0%    1YR 12    5YR 175    Max Repair 60 MSP
Magazine 20   
Lieutenant Commander    Control Rating 1   
Intended Deployment Time: 6 days    Morale Check Required   

Internal Fusion Drive  EP120.00 (1)    Power 120    Fuel Use 1394.27%    Signature 120    Explosion 30%
Fuel Capacity 35 000 Litres    Range 1.29 billion km (20 hours at full power)

MSL-20B Missile Cell (1)     Missile Size: 20    Hangar Reload 223 minutes    MF Reload 37 hours
Missile Fire Control FC48-R150 (1)     Range 48.3m km    Resolution 150
ASM-200 Demiurge Anti-Ship Missile (1)    Speed: 40 200 km/s    End: 2.2m     Range: 5.4m km    WH: 65    Size: 20    TH: 214/128/64

Active Search Sensor AS34-R150 (1)     GPS 1080     Range 34.1m km    Resolution 150

ECM 10

Early Warning Craft needs no introduction. Long range, decent endurance and great sensor coverage is all there is to wish for.

Code: [Select]
E-1 Watcher class Early Warning Craft      500 tons       15 Crew       191.3 BP       TCS 10    TH 144    EM 0
14418 km/s      Armour 1-5       Shields 0-0       HTK 6      Sensors 0/18/0/0      DCR 0      PPV 0
Maint Life 4.48 Years     MSP 73    AFR 20%    IFR 0.3%    1YR 6    5YR 88    Max Repair 72 MSP
Lieutenant Commander    Control Rating 1   
Intended Deployment Time: 1 months    Morale Check Required   

Internal Fusion Drive  EP144.00 (1)    Power 144    Fuel Use 274.92%    Signature 144    Explosion 18%
Fuel Capacity 76 000 Litres    Range 10 billion km (7 days at full power)

ASR-6LR 6K Search Radar (1)     GPS 8640     Range 100.2m km    Resolution 120
EM Sensor EM1.0-18.0 (1)     Sensitivity 18     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  33.5m km

ECM 10

I wish I could make this thing unmanned. It's great to have, but it will pop like a balloon if anything would touch it, while an actual warship may survive and escape. It is very small and can fit in a pocket, though!

Code: [Select]
SJ-2 Torchbearer class Jump Scout      125 tons       4 Crew       32.3 BP       TCS 2    TH 30    EM 0
12073 km/s    JR 1-50      Armour 1-2       Shields 0-0       HTK 2      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 0      PPV 0
Maint Life 0 Years     MSP 0    AFR 24%    IFR 0.3%    1YR 1    5YR 18    Max Repair 15 MSP
Lieutenant Commander    Control Rating 1   
Intended Deployment Time: 3 days    Morale Check Required   

J500 (E10-1-50) Military Jump Drive     Max Ship Size 500 tons    Distance 50k km     Squadron Size 1

Internal Fusion Drive  EP30.00 (1)    Power 30    Fuel Use 348.57%    Signature 30    Explosion 15%
Fuel Capacity 8 000 Litres    Range 3.3 billion km (3 days at full power)

Active Search Sensor AS24-R150 (1)     GPS 540     Range 24.1m km    Resolution 150

The last two designs are for rescuing life pods. H-1 Sotiris is carrier-borne and does not have its own maintenance capability, but H-2 Ranger is intended to be stationed at colonies to be dispatched when needed if life pods are fairly close by.

Code: [Select]
H-1 Sotiris class Rescue Shuttle      125 tons       2 Crew       24 BP       TCS 2    TH 30    EM 0
12073 km/s      Armour 1-2       Shields 0-0       HTK 2      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 0      PPV 0
Maint Life 0 Years     MSP 0    AFR 24%    IFR 0.3%    1YR 1    5YR 16    Max Repair 15 MSP
Cryogenic Berths 200   
Lieutenant Commander    Control Rating 1   
Intended Deployment Time: 1 months    Morale Check Required   

Internal Fusion Drive  EP30.00 (1)    Power 30    Fuel Use 348.57%    Signature 30    Explosion 15%
Fuel Capacity 13 000 Litres    Range 5.4 billion km (5 days at full power)
Code: [Select]
H-2 Ranger class Rescue Shuttle      500 tons       9 Crew       110.2 BP       TCS 10    TH 144    EM 0
14418 km/s      Armour 1-5       Shields 0-0       HTK 7      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 0      PPV 0
Maint Life 5.55 Years     MSP 73    AFR 20%    IFR 0.3%    1YR 4    5YR 60    Max Repair 72 MSP
Cryogenic Berths 200   
Lieutenant Commander    Control Rating 1   
Intended Deployment Time: 3 months    Morale Check Required   

Internal Fusion Drive  EP144.00 (1)    Power 144    Fuel Use 274.92%    Signature 144    Explosion 18%
Fuel Capacity 175 000 Litres    Range 22.9 billion km (18 days at full power)

ECM 10
 

Online L0ckAndL0ad (OP)

  • Lieutenant
  • *******
  • L
  • Posts: 158
  • Thanked: 33 times
Re: Oh, the Humanity: Designs 1.13 edition
« Reply #20 on: Yesterday at 02:55:23 PM »
Oh, I forgot to mention the Fleet Auxiliaries. All these box launchers missile cells need rearmament. Initially, I wanted to make a civilian carrier that would also be able to make small repairs to armor. But so far, I came up with this mobile ordnance transfer hub.

Supplies and Fuel are of secondary priority here, but it has a bit of both. Main function is to rearm missiles near the frontline. 1800 km/s is not much, but this is a "mobile base", not a "ship". Or, at least, a "tender". I've constructed 2 of these so far.

Code: [Select]
Ananke class Resupply Base      200 000 tons       768 Crew       6 595.6 BP       TCS 4 000    TH 7 200    EM 0
1800 km/s    JR 2-25(C)      Armour 1-304       Shields 0-0       HTK 162      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 11      PPV 0
MSP 15 020    Max Repair 2400 MSP
Magazine 5 000    Cryogenic Berths 1 000    Cargo Shuttle Multiplier 2   
Commander    Control Rating 2   BRG   AUX   
Intended Deployment Time: 3 months   
Ordnance Transfer Hub - Capable of transferring ordnance to multiple ships simultaneously

JC200K E10 Commercial Jump Drive     Max Ship Size 200500 tons    Distance 25k km     Squadron Size 2

Commercial Internal Fusion Drive  EP600.0 (12)    Power 7200    Fuel Use 2.89%    Signature 600    Explosion 5%
Fuel Capacity 5 200 000 Litres    Range 162.1 billion km (1042 days at full power)
Refuelling Capability: 125 000 litres per hour     Complete Refuel 41 hours

CIWS-250 (4x10)    Range 1000 km     TS: 25 000 km/s     ROF 5       
This design is classed as a Commercial Vessel for maintenance purposes
This design is classed as a Colony Ship for auto-assignment purposes

The more I use these, the more I realize that it's easier to put both fuel and MSP on the same ship and call it a day. Speed also matters quite a lot, even for a non-frontline vessel. On patrol, this ship can travel with the combat fleet so that its fuel tanks and supply would be full when the call for warships comes in...

Code: [Select]
Reliant class Replenishment Oiler      30 000 tons       264 Crew       1 355 BP       TCS 600    TH 3 000    EM 0
5000 km/s    JR 1-25(C)      Armour 1-86       Shields 0-0       HTK 68      Sensors 18/18/0/0      DCR 11      PPV 0
MSP 7 528    Max Repair 150 MSP
Cryogenic Berths 200    Cargo Shuttle Multiplier 2   
Commander    Control Rating 1   BRG   
Intended Deployment Time: 3 months   

JC30K E10 Commercial Jump Drive     Max Ship Size 30000 tons    Distance 25k km     Squadron Size 1

Commercial Internal Fusion Drive  EP600.0 (5)    Power 3000    Fuel Use 2.89%    Signature 600    Explosion 5%
Fuel Capacity 6 671 000 Litres    Range 1 386.5 billion km (3209 days at full power)
Refuelling Capability: 125 000 litres per hour     Complete Refuel 53 hours

CIWS-250 (2x10)    Range 1000 km     TS: 25 000 km/s     ROF 5       
Long Range Navigation Radar (1)     GPS 5400     Range 76.3m km    Resolution 150
EM Sensor EM1.0-18.0 (1)     Sensitivity 18     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  33.5m km
Thermal Sensor TH1.0-18.0 (1)     Sensitivity 18     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  33.5m km

This design is classed as a Commercial Vessel for maintenance purposes
This design is classed as a Colony Ship for auto-assignment purposes

I also need a dedicated collier to ferry the ammo to Ananke in the field, but I'm still behind in actually producing enough ammo for it to matter, so it'll come later and will be based on Reliant class :D
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 03:02:14 PM by L0ckAndL0ad »