Author Topic: Is Conventional start innately harder?  (Read 3415 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline serger

  • Commodore
  • **********
  • Posts: 639
  • Thanked: 120 times
  • You Posted! You Posted! : Earned for posting at least 1 time.
    Have something to say! Have something to say! : Earned for posting at least 10 times.
    Talkative! Talkative! : Earned for posting at least 100 times.
Re: Is Conventional start innately harder?
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2020, 06:47:39 AM »
Hopefully in the real universe, aliens will have the same courtesy  ::) :D
Well, they have, obviously.
~10 billion years (twice the Sol system age) from the start of spawning Population I (high metallicity) star systems - and "where everybody is"?..
 

Offline skoormit

  • Rear Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 843
  • Thanked: 339 times
  • You Posted! You Posted! : Earned for posting at least 1 time.
    Have something to say! Have something to say! : Earned for posting at least 10 times.
    Talkative! Talkative! : Earned for posting at least 100 times.
Re: Is Conventional start innately harder?
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2020, 07:27:29 AM »
Hopefully in the real universe, aliens will have the same courtesy  ::) :D
Well, they have, obviously.
~10 billion years (twice the Sol system age) from the start of spawning Population I (high metallicity) star systems - and "where everybody is"?..

They are already here.
 

Offline vorpal+5 (OP)

  • Commodore
  • **********
  • Posts: 673
  • Thanked: 148 times
  • You Posted! You Posted! : Earned for posting at least 1 time.
    Have something to say! Have something to say! : Earned for posting at least 10 times.
    Talkative! Talkative! : Earned for posting at least 100 times.
Re: Is Conventional start innately harder?
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2020, 07:51:43 AM »
That's certainly the most intriguing incident to date...
 

Offline SpikeTheHobbitMage

  • Bug Moderators
  • Commodore
  • ***
  • S
  • Posts: 670
  • Thanked: 159 times
  • You Posted! You Posted! : Earned for posting at least 1 time.
    Have something to say! Have something to say! : Earned for posting at least 10 times.
    Talkative! Talkative! : Earned for posting at least 100 times.
Re: Is Conventional start innately harder?
« Reply #18 on: May 27, 2020, 07:53:19 PM »
Hopefully in the real universe, aliens will have the same courtesy  ::) :D
Well, they have, obviously.
~10 billion years (twice the Sol system age) from the start of spawning Population I (high metallicity) star systems - and "where everybody is"?..

They are already here.
That one has already been debunked.  Telephoto video can easily make even a stationary object look arbitrarily faster than the plane filming it.
 

Offline Gabethebaldandbold

  • last member of the noob swarm
  • Lt. Commander
  • ********
  • Posts: 242
  • Thanked: 30 times
  • You Posted! You Posted! : Earned for posting at least 1 time.
    Have something to say! Have something to say! : Earned for posting at least 10 times.
    Talkative! Talkative! : Earned for posting at least 100 times.
Re: Is Conventional start innately harder?
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2020, 12:23:56 PM »
our aliens are Non-TN, they will never leave their own planets.
To beam, or not to beam.   That is the question
the answer is you beam. and you better beam hard.
 

Offline SpikeTheHobbitMage

  • Bug Moderators
  • Commodore
  • ***
  • S
  • Posts: 670
  • Thanked: 159 times
  • You Posted! You Posted! : Earned for posting at least 1 time.
    Have something to say! Have something to say! : Earned for posting at least 10 times.
    Talkative! Talkative! : Earned for posting at least 100 times.
Re: Is Conventional start innately harder?
« Reply #20 on: May 29, 2020, 02:05:36 PM »
our aliens are Non-TN, they will never leave their own planets.
If they are anything like humans then that is probably for the best.
 
The following users thanked this post: vorpal+5