Author Topic: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?  (Read 2521 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bughunter (OP)

  • Bug Moderators
  • Rear Admiral
  • ***
  • Posts: 934
  • Thanked: 133 times
  • Discord Username: Bughunter
Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« on: April 17, 2020, 04:45:50 PM »
..and not Aurora 8.

Sure switching the implementation to another language and more modern platform was a big thing. But it is still the next major release of the same game. Some people who never coded and doesn't frequent the forums much probably doesn't even know what C# is.
 

Offline Agm-114

  • Pulsar 4x Dev
  • Registered
  • Chief Petty Officer
  • ***
  • Posts: 41
  • Thanked: 16 times
  • Discord Username: AGM-114#7218
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2020, 04:50:20 PM »
It's a total rewrite, so it's not the next major release.
 
The following users thanked this post: superstrijder15, Ri0Rdian

Offline Erik L

  • Administrator
  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • *****
  • Posts: 5687
  • Thanked: 414 times
  • Forum Admin
  • Discord Username: icehawke
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2020, 05:30:39 PM »
Because Aurora 2 dropped over a decade ago :)
 
The following users thanked this post: Scud

Offline Kyle

  • Captain
  • **********
  • K
  • Posts: 472
  • Thanked: 974 times
  • Quasar4x dev
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2020, 08:07:15 PM »
Same reason we say "steel beams" or "ice cubes," to specify what it's made out of!

(And I doubt something like Aurora III is ever gonna stick, but if it does.... I was first![1])

[1] Citation needed
« Last Edit: April 17, 2020, 08:11:00 PM by Kyle »
 

Offline MarcAFK

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2005
  • Thanked: 134 times
  • ...it's so simple an idiot could have devised it..
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2020, 08:16:13 PM »
What happened to windows 9?
Wheres the Iphone 9?
Why isn't Teslas next car the model 4?
Why didn't microsoft name C# C+++ ?
" Why is this godforsaken hellhole worth dying for? "
". . .  We know nothing about them, their language, their history or what they look like.  But we can assume this.  They stand for everything we don't stand for.  Also they told me you guys look like dorks. "
"Stop exploding, you cowards.  "
 

Offline Agm-114

  • Pulsar 4x Dev
  • Registered
  • Chief Petty Officer
  • ***
  • Posts: 41
  • Thanked: 16 times
  • Discord Username: AGM-114#7218
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2020, 08:17:54 PM »
That last one is very very cursed.
 

Offline mtm84

  • Sub-Lieutenant
  • ******
  • m
  • Posts: 131
  • Thanked: 37 times
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2020, 08:18:48 PM »
Technically it would be C+=2.

Also no windows 9 because 3rd party windows devs where extra lazy with how they did version checking.
 
The following users thanked this post: Alsadius

Offline MarcAFK

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2005
  • Thanked: 134 times
  • ...it's so simple an idiot could have devised it..
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2020, 08:21:36 PM »
They could have called it windows 09+XE NEXT
" Why is this godforsaken hellhole worth dying for? "
". . .  We know nothing about them, their language, their history or what they look like.  But we can assume this.  They stand for everything we don't stand for.  Also they told me you guys look like dorks. "
"Stop exploding, you cowards.  "
 

Offline Father Tim

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2162
  • Thanked: 532 times
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2020, 10:18:04 PM »
Because arguing over whether it's pronounced C hash, C sharp, C number, or even Captcha (?) Aurora is fun.


- - - - -


Though I must remember "C plus plus plus plus"
 

Offline Erik L

  • Administrator
  • Admiral of the Fleet
  • *****
  • Posts: 5687
  • Thanked: 414 times
  • Forum Admin
  • Discord Username: icehawke
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #9 on: April 17, 2020, 10:34:45 PM »
Because arguing over whether it's pronounced C hash, C sharp, C number, or even Captcha (?) Aurora is fun.


- - - - -


Though I must remember "C plus plus plus plus"

Everyone knows it is C Octothorpe
 
The following users thanked this post: Alsadius

Offline Froggiest1982

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • F
  • Posts: 1415
  • Thanked: 668 times
  • 2023 Supporter 2023 Supporter : Supporter of the forum in 2023
    2024 Supporter 2024 Supporter : Supporter of the forum for 2024
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter :
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #10 on: April 17, 2020, 10:36:39 PM »
Because God (Steve) has decided so.

And who are we to doubt God's word?

Offline SpikeTheHobbitMage

  • Bug Moderators
  • Commodore
  • ***
  • S
  • Posts: 670
  • Thanked: 159 times
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #11 on: April 17, 2020, 10:40:01 PM »
Technically it would be C+=2.

Also no windows 9 because 3rd party windows devs where extra lazy with how they did version checking.
If by "3rd party windows devs" you mean Microsoft themselves.  Checking for a version string starting with '9' was the official way to detect a DOS-based 32 bit Windows.

Because God (Steve) has decided so.

And who are we to doubt God's word?
Exactly.  That would be heresy.  FOR THE EMPEROR.
 

Offline Father Tim

  • Vice Admiral
  • **********
  • Posts: 2162
  • Thanked: 532 times
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #12 on: April 17, 2020, 10:48:14 PM »
Because God (Steve) has decided so.

And who are we to doubt God's word?

Thomas, if I'm remembering correctly.
 
The following users thanked this post: SpikeTheHobbitMage, smoelf, Alsadius

Offline Paul Shakur

  • Petty Officer
  • **
  • Posts: 18
  • Thanked: 10 times
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #13 on: April 18, 2020, 12:01:34 AM »
..and not Aurora 8.

Sure switching the implementation to another language and more modern platform was a big thing. But it is still the next major release of the same game. Some people who never coded and doesn't frequent the forums much probably doesn't even know what C# is.
Because creator of this software (Steve) calls it Aurora C#. If you develop program (game) you will give it a name. When you will have a child and give it a name, everyone who knows him/her will be calling it by name You given to him/her.

Why do we have to call you "Bughunter" at this forum? I think we should call you "How developer dare to name program something else than I want" (and this is sarcasm).
 

Offline Bughunter (OP)

  • Bug Moderators
  • Rear Admiral
  • ***
  • Posts: 934
  • Thanked: 133 times
  • Discord Username: Bughunter
Re: Why are we still calling it Aurora C#?
« Reply #14 on: April 18, 2020, 12:19:12 AM »

Because creator of this software (Steve) calls it Aurora C#.

That is of course the one that cannot be argued against :) But I always saw C# as kind of a development project name, like (P) marker, and expected it to drop eventually. But guess it stuck now.