Author Topic: Which mining combo is better: autos and mass drivers or orbitals and freighters?  (Read 422 times)

db48x and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Iestwyn (OP)

  • Warrant Officer, Class 1
  • *****
  • I
  • Posts: 92
  • Thanked: 8 times
When I played Aurora ages ago, I set up unmanned mining bases by shipping automatic mines and mass drivers to the body and shooting them at the biggest base in the system. Looking at the C# AARs, it looks like most people are towing large orbital mining platforms to the body and using freighters to ship the materials where they're needed. In fact, I'm not seeing reference to mass drivers in any of the threads.

Are there advantages/disadvantages to either tactic? Do people even use mass drivers anymore?

Thanks in advance!
 

Offline nuclearslurpee

  • Warrant Officer, Class 2
  • ****
  • Posts: 64
  • Thanked: 38 times
  • Radioactive frozen beverage.
Behold!

Code: [Select]
Obsidian class Orbital Mining Platform      150,000 tons       1,225 Crew       3,621.7 BP       TCS 3,000    TH 300    EM 0
100 km/s      Armour 1-251       Shields 0-0       HTK 195      Sensors 6/6/0/0      DCR 1      PPV 0
MSP 15    Max Repair 120 MSP
Cargo 25,000    Cargo Shuttle Multiplier 2   
Lieutenant Commander    Control Rating 1   BRG   
Intended Deployment Time: 3 months   
Orbital Miner: 23 modules producing 276 tons per mineral per annum

Fokin Drive Systems NPE-100 Skywalker (3)    Power 300    Fuel Use 8.94%    Signature 100    Explosion 5%
Fuel Capacity 1,184,000 Litres    Range 15.9 billion km (1838 days at full power)

Arslangiin-Damdinsuryn AD-6100K Mark 6 Waveform Detector (1)     Sensitivity 6     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  19.4m km
Angulo-Guindo AG-6M T6 Series Infrared Scanner (1)     Sensitivity 6     Detect Sig Strength 1000:  19.4m km

This design is classed as a Commercial Vessel for maintenance purposes

Designed to be completely self-sufficient for an almost indefinite length of time, the Obsidian-class orbital mining platform comes equipped with a 25,000-ton cargo bay expressly for the purpose of lugging around a Mass Driver as it lumbers from asteroid to asteroid mining up minerals for my empire.

Is this optimal? Probably not, but it was fun to build and now you know that at least one person uses mass drivers.  ;D

More seriously I suspect there's a few reasons that most people use the platform/tug/freighter setup instead:
  • Large orbital platforms without engines can be build as space stations using planetside construction, which notably means you don't need a shipyard big enough to build a 150,000-ton monster ship. Personally I don't see this as a big hindrance since 150,000 tons of commercial shipyard is the same as 15,000 tons of naval shipyard and nobody would call the latter excessive.
  • Using tugs means you don't have to put engines on your mining platform, which once you've built the platform it's good forever assuming all you put on it were OM modules. The tug is the only thing that needs replacing as tech advances and you only need a couple of tugs to manage your mining platforms since they are park-and-forget installations.
  • Freighters over mass drivers makes sense since most asteroids only have one freighter-load of minerals anyways (depending how big your freighters are), so if you have to make one trip either way why not ship the minerals instead of the mass driver not to mention having to spend money building the things? Of course, mass drivers give you the minerals as soon as you mine them, which can be very useful if you're experiencing a crunch

That said, my setup is perfectly fine, as the only issues are needing a "big" shipyard (eh) and "wasting" tonnage on engines and cargo handling, but the logistics are a lot simpler with only one ship instead of three (please ignore the fact that I then promptly complicate things by having my tugs fly around the galaxy towing sensor platforms into place...ah, simplicity...  :P )

EDIT: I do also use the AM + Mass Driver setup early in the game, mostly to mine comets. It works in the early game, but AMs are more expensive than both regular mines and OM modules (240 corundium versus 120 for the others) so it's better once you get going to conserve AMs for use on worlds where conventional colonies are too expensive but the body is too big for orbital mining. In those cases you can either use AMs or use normal Mines plus habitat modules if you're scraping the bottom of your corundium barrels or just want to build more big space stations.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2020, 08:25:56 PM by nuclearslurpee »
 
The following users thanked this post: Iestwyn

Offline froggiest1982

  • Commodore
  • **********
  • f
  • Posts: 744
  • Thanked: 251 times
I always use a combination of both as it depends on the situation.

There are systems where u need a unique centre to stockpile minerals and so you will use Mass Drivers to ship them there to pick them up later.

On the other hand, sometimes you need to exploit only tgat particular mineral at that location and so Orbital solutions are the way to go.
 
The following users thanked this post: Iestwyn

Offline misanthropope

  • Sub-Lieutenant
  • ******
  • m
  • Posts: 123
  • Thanked: 32 times
automines are so expensive, it's worth going pretty far out of your way to minimize your construction of the things.  in the same vein, CF are expensive and should really only be built for, and used for, critical tasks like building more research facilities.  a lot of commercial SY capacity can be had for cheap, so using that to build orbital miners and terraforming just seems like the winning option, to me. 

theres going to be the occasional rich venusian hellworld you have to pass over, but a little conquest and/ or excavation will net you a decent number of automines to go back and exploit those.
 
The following users thanked this post: Iestwyn

Offline Iestwyn (OP)

  • Warrant Officer, Class 1
  • *****
  • I
  • Posts: 92
  • Thanked: 8 times
Makes a lot of sense. Thanks guys!
 

Offline Malorn

  • Warrant Officer, Class 1
  • *****
  • M
  • Posts: 84
  • Thanked: 16 times
Uhhh... both?

You park orbitals over a comet/asteroid to mine it, and build the space station with one cargo bay to hold a single mass driver. It drops off the mass driver, which ships out the ore, then picks it back up when it's done to be moved by tugs to a new location. Upside is ease of management and not using any freighters at all. Downside is that it can be blown to hell easily by hostile aliens.
 
The following users thanked this post: Iestwyn

Offline Iestwyn (OP)

  • Warrant Officer, Class 1
  • *****
  • I
  • Posts: 92
  • Thanked: 8 times
Uhhh... both?

You park orbitals over a comet/asteroid to mine it, and build the space station with one cargo bay to hold a single mass driver. It drops off the mass driver, which ships out the ore, then picks it back up when it's done to be moved by tugs to a new location. Upside is ease of management and not using any freighters at all. Downside is that it can be blown to hell easily by hostile aliens.

Yeah, that's the same design that Mr Slurpee posted. A little cumbersome, but it looks like it would work.
 

Offline Michael Sandy

  • Commodore
  • **********
  • M
  • Posts: 741
  • Thanked: 75 times
Put at least 1 engine on all your mining stations so they can make use of commercial jump engined jump tender/tugs.
 
The following users thanked this post: Iestwyn

Offline Iestwyn (OP)

  • Warrant Officer, Class 1
  • *****
  • I
  • Posts: 92
  • Thanked: 8 times
Put at least 1 engine on all your mining stations so they can make use of commercial jump engined jump tender/tugs.

I've been able to move space stations with commercial tugs before, no engines included.
 

Offline TheTalkingMeowth

  • Lieutenant
  • *******
  • T
  • Posts: 177
  • Thanked: 69 times
Put at least 1 engine on all your mining stations so they can make use of commercial jump engined jump tender/tugs.
I'm pretty sure engineless ships can transit via a (commercial) tender just fine.
 
The following users thanked this post: Iestwyn

 

Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74