Hello, I'm having difficulty determining why one class of ships did so much better than another with point defense against a precursor missile salvo.
After the AMM screen, 31 missiles in 3 groups made it through and my gauss ships of various classes took their turn. All but 1 were knocked out. All I know about these precursor missiles is that they were size 4 and traveled at 30.1 kps. The 2 classes I'm concerned about are below. The Morale/Grade/Training are maxed out for all involved ships.
4 of these ~55 year old ships in the below class killed 13 missiles with an actual hit rate of 20.6%
Applicable combat log entry: Shots 63 Missile Kills 13 Decoy Hits 0 Overkill 9 Avg CTH 18.2% Hit 20.6% Kill 20.6%
Liscome Bay I class Light Cruiser 13,229 tons 329 Crew 1,466.1 BP TCS 265 TH 1,600 EM 0
6047 km/s Armour 3-49 Shields 0-0 HTK 67 Sensors 5/0/0/0 DCR 8-6 PPV 36
Maint Life 1.63 Years MSP 554 AFR 175% IFR 2.4% 1YR 244 5YR 3,667 Max Repair 200 MSP
Commander Control Rating 1 BRG
Intended Deployment Time: 12 months Morale Check Required
Engine M400 FC.699 S2000 TR100 Nuclear Pulse (4) Power 1600 Fuel Use 69.88% Signature 400 Explosion 12%
Fuel Capacity 750,000 Litres Range 14.6 billion km (27 days at full power)
Gauss Cannon RF3/5 R20 S300 (6x3) Range 20,000km TS: 6,047 km/s Power 0-0 RM 20,000 km ROF 5
Beam FC R32 TS6200 S78 EH0 ECCM0 (1) Max Range: 32,000 km TS: 6,200 km/s ECCM-0 69 38 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sensor Active359k R1 S50 EH0 (1) GPS 10 Range 4m km MCR 359k km Resolution 1
Sensor Active18m5k R100 S50 EH0 ECCM0 (1) GPS 1000 Range 18.5m km Resolution 100
Sensor TH17 S50 EH0 (1) Sensitivity 5 Detect Sig Strength 1000: 17.7m km
And 6 of these 2-3 year old ships in the below class killed 7 missiles with an actual hit rate of 6.3%
Applicable combat log entry: Shots 112 Missile Kills 7 Decoy Hits 0 Overkill 95 Avg CTH 31.8% Hit 6.3% Kill 6.3%
On average, these ships have commanders with better tactical bonuses than the above ships.
Ticonderoga II class Cruiser 16,504 tons 442 Crew 2,759.6 BP TCS 330 TH 3,038 EM 0
9202 km/s Armour 5-57 Shields 0-0 HTK 84 Sensors 6/0/0/0 DCR 12-7 PPV 54
Maint Life 1.61 Years MSP 1,254 AFR 182% IFR 2.5% 1YR 562 5YR 8,437 Max Repair 506.3 MSP
Commander Control Rating 2 BRG AUX
Intended Deployment Time: 12 months Morale Check Required
Engine M1012 FC.519 S3000 TR100 Ion (3) Power 3037.5 Fuel Use 51.87% Signature 1012.5 Explosion 13%
Fuel Capacity 1,105,000 Litres Range 23.2 billion km (29 days at full power)
Gauss Cannon RF4/5 R30 S300 (9x4) Range 30,000km TS: 9,202 km/s Power 0-0 RM 30,000 km ROF 5
Beam FC R44.8 TS9200 S40 EH0 ECCM2 (1) Max Range: 44,800 km TS: 9,200 km/s ECCM-2 78 55 33 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sensor Active R16 19.6m800 S75 EH0 ECCM2 (1) GPS 384 Range 19.7m km Resolution 16
Sensor Active R1 703k S75 EH0 ECCM2 (1) GPS 24 Range 7.8m km MCR 703.6k km Resolution 1
Sensor TH19 S50 EH0 (1) Sensitivity 6 Detect Sig Strength 1000: 19.4m km
Electronic Warfare Jammers: Fire Control 2 Missile 3
I'm not sure why the 50 year old ships with no EW and slower tracking cannons are hitting far better than my brand new cruisers. There were 2 other classes of ships involved that also did as poorly as the second group, which were in between the above two in age/tech levels.