Gothic IV Comments Thread

[Steve Walmsley (OP)]

Please add any comments for the Gothic IV campaign in this thread.

[Ghostly]

New precursors sound very exciting! Really hope you get to face some carriers too, from them or perhaps from that multi-system NPR. One part that particularly piqued my interest is where:

the Necrons adjusted their course to move around the planet

Will the AI now attempt to avoid STO defenses, or try to outrange them if it's trying to attack them? Come to think of it, it would be nice to have an intel entry for alien STO units detailing their weapon type, range and ROF, same way we do for ships.

Another thing that I thought could be a nice cosmetic addition but which will have actual gameplay relevance given the new emergence mechanics would be a list of dates on each colony summary noting when the colony was first Established, Developed (first installation added) and Populated.

[Steve Walmsley (OP)]

New precursors sound very exciting! Really hope you get to face some carriers too, from them or perhaps from that multi-system NPR. One part that particularly piqued my interest is where:

the Necrons adjusted their course to move around the planet

Will the AI now attempt to avoid STO defenses, or try to outrange them if it's trying to attack them? Come to think of it, it would be nice to have an intel entry for alien STO units detailing their weapon type, range and ROF, same way we do for ships.

There are some AI tweaks for v2.6, including consideration of alien STO locations and better use of ordnance against small targets.

[Panopticon]

The AI changes seem to have significantly raised the difficulty, the Necrons out-teched you but even so that was a pretty gripping fight. The new version can't come soon enough for me.

One note though, the Inquisition was formed after the Horus Heresy, during the Great Crusade and Heresy era intelligence was handled by ad hoc groups from virtually all human factions working at cross purposes. Which I recognize might be hard to represent, just the 40k pedant in me.

[Garfunkel]

Whoa, what a crazy start for this campaign!

[Ghostly]

This is shaping up to be a very interesting campaign! Some very exciting new additions are noticeable, enemy trigger discipline against small targets and single fire control use in particular. And missiles with active sensors and retargeting? Don't believe I've ever seen that in the current version!

However, the Necrons had destroyed their ordnance stockpile once they knew defeat was inevitable.

Maybe they could stop doing that, now that we're finally getting a use for it beyond scrapping it all? Leaving their entire missile stockpile for us certainly wouldn't do, since it's seemingly limitless, but with an entire planet's worth of ordnance even the Necrons could miss a few dozen missiles here and there...

Five seconds later, a further four Furies were destroyed, although they were able to return fire from 37,500 km and inflict over fifty strength-1 hits on the Khopesh, including fourteen that penetrated its armour. The third volley from the Khopesh killed four more Furies, before it was buried under an avalanche of lascannon fire, suffering forty-five internal hits. The Necron fleet chose that moment, with the fighters at point-blank range, to launch sixty-one anti-ship torpedoes.

Did the enemy ships conserve their ammunition until they realized the danger presented by a swarm of fighters at point-blank range? If so, this is seriously impressive, but I have to confess I don't really understand this part, as the fighters' weapon capabilities should've been known to the Necrons from all the point defense fire they've observed.

Also, I can't help but ask, given your efforts to ambush the Thokt and the Thanatos group in the end, does the AI still have no concept of lost contacts/object permanence, or did it deem the inner system safe because a few months passed between the two fights? Really hoping for the latter, but very excited for the new update either way!

[Beersatron]

I just finished reading The Flight of the Eisenstein so this is great timing!

[Inglonias]

I'm curious how long you play a given campaign for, Steve. I find that long-lived Aurora 4X let's plays are few and far between, for better or worse, and that mostly because the nature of the game means that complexity and micromanagement ramps up quickly as the number of systems and colonies grows. I saw the screenshots of the galactic maps you posted in the Changes thread showing 100+ star systems in a single game. I don't know how you do it.

[Steve Walmsley (OP)]

I'm curious how long you play a given campaign for, Steve. I find that long-lived Aurora 4X let's plays are few and far between, for better or worse, and that mostly because the nature of the game means that complexity and micromanagement ramps up quickly as the number of systems and colonies grows. I saw the screenshots of the galactic maps you posted in the Changes thread showing 100+ star systems in a single game. I don't know how you do it.

It depends how long I maintain my interest. The longest published campaign for C# was Empire of the Stars, which had 300+ systems, but I had an earlier unpublished WH40k campaign that had 500+ systems, a lot of NPRs and seven active Swarm fleets. I don't find it too difficult to keep it organized, mainly due to expanding the naval admin structure as required. Plus I automate quite a lot, with tankers picking up fuel on a loop and freighters doing the same for minerals. Survey ships are mainly automated anyway. I tend to setup maintenance facilities and supplies/fuel where I need fleets, so they don't need attention apart from an occasional check on supply stockpiles. So its down to major fleet deployments, occasionally re-deploying survey forces, assigning guard forces, managing production, etc.

[nuclearslurpee]

Great to see a new Steve campaign, and the new AI seems to make the Necrons a proper threat. I assume that they are similarly more difficult in their non-"advanced" traditional form, maybe even more so since they will be able to maintain their missile stockpiles. Very happy to see the AI learning better ways to deal with fighters and bombers, although I do wonder if they'll be able to handle more traditional bomber strikes from much longer range (40+ m km versus ~10-20 m km).

Hopefully as this campaign goes on we will see combat with a few different NPRs and most of the other spoilers as well. 

Steve, is there a setting to change the size of the spoiler ship classes? Or is it random and you've just had good luck here?

[Napier]

There is mention of keeping the shields down to withhold that intel from the spoilers. Is that just RP, or are there behavior changes from them if they get that info? i.e. changing missile salvo densities and narrower targeting concentration.

[Steve Walmsley (OP)]

There is mention of keeping the shields down to withhold that intel from the spoilers. Is that just RP, or are there behavior changes from them if they get that info? i.e. changing missile salvo densities and narrower targeting concentration.

The AI tracks information about your ships, including observed point defence performance and how much damage they took to kill in the past. They will include shield strength in that calculation when determining how many missiles to allocate to a given target.

However, in this case I was keeping shields down to deny them sensor information on the location of my ships. Active shields have a strong signature that can be tracked by EM sensors.

[Neophyte]

Does the AI share the information across all instances of that spoiler?  IE, will any future Necrons in other systems know the details about the player's ships performance gleaned from the battles in Orpheus?

[Steve Walmsley (OP)]

Does the AI share the information across all instances of that spoiler?  IE, will any future Necrons in other systems know the details about the player's ships performance gleaned from the battles in Orpheus?

The AI shares information on a racial basis. So all Necrons will know the same information, but different swarm races won't share with each other.