Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
41
C# Mechanics / Re: v2.6.0 Changes Discussion Thread
« Last post by alex_brunius on June 27, 2025, 04:57:24 PM »
Yeah, but why not convert them into 10 automines instead of a new facility type? Does taking twice the cargo space really matter?
In a lot of my low or mid tech games before Civilians snowball and you have the economy to use them for free shipping then cargo space can matter quite a bit. I often find myself limited if not by cargo space, then by cargo space of faster haulers than can move the installations and other stuff around quickly to where I want it.

It also depends alot on playstyle and how heavily you militarize (if you use too much SY and Production on military stuff leaving too little for Commercial ships), but certainly possible to get yourself into this position.
42
C# Mechanics / Re: v2.6.0 Changes Discussion Thread
« Last post by paolot on June 27, 2025, 04:48:35 PM »
Can XCM be scrapped? If so, how many materials could we get back at maximum?
43
C# Mechanics / Re: v2.6.0 Changes Discussion Thread
« Last post by Droll on June 27, 2025, 11:50:09 AM »
And idea for industrial NPRs and "ships" might be to limit them to having a constellation of conventional tech battlestations. Since they won't be going anywhere and will have the support of the homeworld logistically it would probably be the simplest way of giving industrial NPRs a military presence in space.

They wouldn't be a threat like you mentioned for conventional ships but at least they'll be in the way
44
C# Mechanics / Re: v2.6.0 Changes Discussion Thread
« Last post by Ghostly on June 27, 2025, 11:06:04 AM »
Not sure how I feel about a new type of installation being added just to handle captured CMCs, but it sure beats having to pay enemy civilians after you conquer their stuff! I definitely agree with making them less efficient than automines though.

It also makes me wonder whether an "aggressive nationalization" type of play could be had now, allowing your civilians to breed CMCs on eligible but undesirable bodies (duranium-only planets, for example) before making them independent, conquering them and moving their installations elsewhere. This has the same energy as building force labor camps for your main race, not something I'd do but something that allows interesting roleplay possibilities.

Also, I can't thank you enough for the ECM changes and the spinal Particles, truly amazing stuff! Something I'd like to ask is whether Sensor Jammers' interaction with ECCM remains unchanged, and whether you've given any thought to the possibility of ECM having partial effects against superior ECCM and vice versa, as discussed here. I know it's not as straightforward as making the ECM penalty multiplicative, but it might be a great addition to the game if done right.
45
C# Suggestions / Avoid refit checkbox qol
« Last post by Nostramo on June 27, 2025, 11:05:12 AM »
Hi, I would like to suggest adding an "Avoid Refit" checkbox button for the selected fleet in the fleet organization menu.

I think this will be very convenient for players who, like me, like to leave a couple of fleets in combat-ready condition to protect the capital while other fleets are being upgraded.
Such a button will save your time, and allow you not to worry about carefully choosing the correct name for each ship that you send for upgrade from the shipyard menu. Or a short-term leaving the planet's orbit, or whatever else to avoid refit for the cover fleets.
This is my humble suggestion on how to improve QOL when we playing this brilliant game :)
46
C# Mechanics / Re: v2.6.0 Changes Discussion Thread
« Last post by Steve Walmsley on June 27, 2025, 10:09:48 AM »
Why not just convert captured CMCs into automines?

A couple of reasons. If they were converted into automated mines, why don't civilians just use auto mines in the first place? Other civilian/commercial equipment tends to be larger and less efficient, so the same should apply to civilian mining colonies. Secondly, for game balance purposes, I didn't want to create an easy source of additional automated mines. The XMC can still be used in the same role, but is less efficient due to the transport requirements.
47
Development Discussions / Re: Naming Theme Suggestions
« Last post by Tavik Toth on June 27, 2025, 09:59:42 AM »
Names of Free Planets Alliance ships from Legend of the Galactic Heroes.
48
C# Mechanics / Re: v2.6.0 Changes Discussion Thread
« Last post by Ush213 on June 27, 2025, 09:43:10 AM »
Yeah, but why not convert them into 10 automines instead of a new facility type? Does taking twice the cargo space really matter?

Ya i see your point you could carry 20 automines to an asteroid for double the production in the same time you bring one XCM. suppose i missed that point.
Still though it would be worth capturing them for the corrundum saving no. you would have to capture 10 automines for the same output. Cargo hauling is never a bottleneck for me in my games so moving it around isnt an issue for me. 

I wonder what problem or gameplay loop Steve was doing to see the need for XCMs
49
C# Mechanics / Re: v2.6.0 Changes Discussion Thread
« Last post by Zap0 on June 27, 2025, 09:37:19 AM »
Yeah, but why not convert them into 10 automines instead of a new facility type? Does taking twice the cargo space really matter?
50
C# Mechanics / Re: v2.6.0 Changes Discussion Thread
« Last post by Ush213 on June 27, 2025, 09:36:12 AM »
Like the ECM changes.

Why not just convert captured CMCs into automines?

ECMs are 10X more productive then automines. So they would be more sought after.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk