Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
C# Tutorials / Re: Such a long time since I was involved in combat
« Last post by legemaine on Today at 02:12:07 PM »
Hi JacenHan, thanks for this. You were right - that's what I had forgotten.

Playing Aurora is NOT like riding a bicycle - you certainly can't just pick up where you left off. But it probably wouldn't be as engrossing if you could

Regards
2
C# Suggestions / Re: Suggestions Thread for v2.4.0
« Last post by AlStar on Today at 01:23:00 PM »
With the current behavior or with a new toggle switch, in either case the solution is "RTFM" and, since if we're being honest here the "FM" is not very readable maybe some better or more accessible documentation would be useful. That said, either way, it is a lesson a player learns once and then (usually) remembers for the next time.
You bring up good points - I've never fooled around with multi-race or cohabitating with NPR starts, so didn't consider that.

Maybe just a warning in the log, then? "Ship XXX was fired upon by NEUTRAL alien race! We are currently holding fire as per rules of engagement." (or somesuch.)

I've been enjoying his AAR, but haven't read it in the last week or so; if he managed to get shot by filthy neutrals, then he's just another in the pile - I was actually reacting to a recent Reddit post.
3
C# Suggestions / Re: Suggestions Thread for v2.4.0
« Last post by nuclearslurpee on Today at 12:26:13 PM »
Given by the number of posts that I've seen pop up, both on this forum and on Reddit, over the years; I think it might make sense to have any NPR that's currently marked as Neutral to automatically be set to Hostile when they open fire on your ships or kill a ground unit.

This should help curb at least one of the causes of the common message of "why can't I shoot back?"

I like the principle, but I think there's a lot of annoying "edge" cases where this wouldn't work.

Generally there are plenty of roleplay circumstances where you would want relations to remain nominally neutral after firing or being fired upon, which could range from warning shots fired at a scout or survey ship infringing your territory up to a conflict limited to only one or several systems but not a full-scale galactic war. In this case, automatically setting races to Hostile status can lead to some undesired expansion of the conflict, such as:
  • STOs in "non-involved" systems may fire on the now hostile ships.
  • Ground forces on shared bodies in non-involved systems will engage each other.
  • Mines (of the explosive variety) may trigger unexpectedly.
  • Specific to NPRs, but in "warning shot" situations additional unintended fire in other locations, for example from fire controls set to fire at will (e.g., "Oops, there goes the alien diplo ship"), will worsen relations and make it much harder to restore neutrality after firing said warning shots.
Note that shared bodies are particularly relevant in games with multiple player races, but also can be relevant in games with NPRs - particularly in cases with mixed player race and NPR starts in Sol, which is not an uncommon setup.

At the very least, it needs to be a toggled behavior which isn't something we have a lot of in the Aurora UI, and would likely cause just as many issues for the kinds of players who are likely to run into the above scenarios (e.g., NATO vs Soviet, "I shot at their survey ship, why are the Soviets invading Poland?" situations).

With the current behavior or with a new toggle switch, in either case the solution is "RTFM" and, since if we're being honest here the "FM" is not very readable maybe some better or more accessible documentation would be useful. That said, either way, it is a lesson a player learns once and then (usually) remembers for the next time.

P.S. Is this by any chance a suggestion motivated by recent events in the Blue Emu AAR @ Pdox forums? If so, I'd hesitate to draw a lot of conclusions from that experience, as Blue Emu is a great authAAR but really doesn't read the documentation very well and this is far from the first fairly basic error in understanding he's made in that AAR.
4
C# Suggestions / Re: Suggestions Thread for v2.4.0
« Last post by AlStar on Today at 10:33:11 AM »
Given by the number of posts that I've seen pop up, both on this forum and on Reddit, over the years; I think it might make sense to have any NPR that's currently marked as Neutral to automatically be set to Hostile when they open fire on your ships or kill a ground unit.

This should help curb at least one of the causes of the common message of "why can't I shoot back?"
5
The Academy / Re: Survey Ship Fleet Organization
« Last post by Garfunkel on Today at 05:29:35 AM »
Would definitely not start a flamewar over your suggestion. I explore a lot because that the part of the game i enjoy, well not the surveyship micromanagement but the discover new system and mine them. I dont find much fun in the war mechanism against the AI, so usually I completely turn off the AI, meaning I never use warships.  I simply like to explore and extract resources build colonies, expand population, etc. I just the way i like to play, and that require a lot of surveyeing because i never meet any ressistence and use a lot of resources very fastly.
Oh, I see, my apologies for assuming how you want to play. Your best bet is to probably follow the example of other players who build large, extremely long duration survey ships that can largely operate on their own.
6
General Discussion / Re: Removing commanders
« Last post by vorpal+5 on Today at 03:13:44 AM »
Perhaps a checkbox before the ship name would make you jump to the commander?
7
General Discussion / Re: Removing commanders
« Last post by Kiero on Today at 02:17:35 AM »
On the bottom right you can search for commanders by their skills.
So you can limit your search to LCDR's and pick an ability for that specific position on a ship.

But yes searching for commanders should be audited  ;D
8
C# Tutorials / Re: Such a long time since I was involved in combat
« Last post by JacenHan on Today at 12:52:44 AM »
Did you enter the "Ship Combat" tab and set targets + open fire for the ship? STOs will automatically attack nearby enemies, but ships will not.
9
C# Tutorials / Such a long time since I was involved in combat
« Last post by legemaine on Today at 12:15:33 AM »
Hi all, I can't remember how many years ago I last actually had a ship fire at something, and it seems that I've forgotten stuff.

I've just had a lone spoiler attack my commercial fleet based at Earth, where I had a Monitor ship and an STO based. At first nothing fired back (spoiler was in orbit so in range of everything) - but then I manually toggled enemy to hostile (who knew - it was killing ships!) and the STO engaged, but the Monitor not. What might I have forgotten to do in order to get the Monitor to fire? I attach the monitor specs, but I don't think I forgot any of the basics (weapon, FC, PP)

Denethor class Monitor      2,618 tons       106 Crew       404.6 BP       TCS 52    TH 15    EM 0
286 km/s      Armour 3-16       Shields 0-0       HTK 26      Sensors 0/0/0/0      DCR 2-7      PPV 17
Maint Life 7.12 Years     MSP 193    AFR 27%    IFR 0.4%    1YR 7    5YR 100    Max Repair 50 MSP
Commander    Control Rating 1   BRG   
Intended Deployment Time: 48 months    Morale Check Required   

Rolls Royce Hobbit II M-NPE-125T15 (1)    Power 15    Fuel Use 87.69%    Signature 15    Explosion 7%
Fuel Capacity 100,000 Litres    Range 7.8 billion km (316 days at full power)

Lockheed Kinetics Firestreak 20cm HCG V40/C3 (2x4)    Range 128,000km     TS: 2,000 km/s     Power 12-3     RM 40,000 km    ROF 20       
Lockheed Kinetics Pepperpot 10cm CDCG V40/C3 (1x4)    Range 40,000km     TS: 2,000 km/s     Power 3-3     RM 40,000 km    ROF 5       
GE Narrowbeam BFC-AM R64-TS6000 (1)     Max Range: 64,000 km   TS: 6,000 km/s    ECCM-0     84 69 53 38 22 6 0 0 0 0
Marconi Spark BFC-LR R128-TS2000 (1)     Max Range: 128,000 km   TS: 2,000 km/s    ECCM-0     46 42 38 34 30 27 23 19 15 11
Hitachi Power PBR R5 (2)     Total Power Output 10    Exp 5%

GE Broadbeam  AS18-R100 (1)     GPS 1000     Range 18.5m km    Resolution 100
Ferranti  AS41-R100 (1)     GPS 5000     Range 41.4m km    Resolution 100

This design is classed as a Military Vessel for maintenance purposes
This design is classed as a Warship for auto-assignment purposes
10
General Discussion / Re: Removing commanders
« Last post by vorpal+5 on Yesterday at 11:44:51 PM »
And how do I know who is commanding what?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk